Mailing List Archive

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64893

--- Comment #2 from zsl <zhoushulin1992@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Christophe JAILLET from comment #1)
> I think that nowadays, the limit is much higher and there is no check in the
> code to test the limit given in the doc.
>
> I think that it comes from old ages as 32767 is the maximum value for an int
> on a 16 bits machine.

So, do we need to add some check code to update this 'legacy' upper bound,
since most systems are 64 bits now? Or just keep the document as it is,
considering the fact that 32767 request header fields is enough?

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64893

Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW |RESOLVED

--- Comment #3 from Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> ---
Fixed in r1883412 in trunk and r1883413 on 2.4.x.
I've removed the value in the doc. It is useless and erroneous.

Hoping my wording is not to bad :)

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org