Mailing List Archive

On Mon, 13 Nov 1995, Rob Hartill wrote:
> I think Apache is about 9 months old now...
>
> time 1.0 was born.

We've been in labor for about 3 months now.

Can we assemble a final list of things to do to get it to 1.0?

What are the outstanding, SHOWSTOPPING patches to 0.8.16?

Where are we with updated documentation? I presume this was in drtr's
area - I hope he's aware I've been making changes to the live
www.apache.org tree as needs have dictated.

The apache-users list is ready, 93 users and counting.

And we're *ALL* ready to start adding more features.

If someone can assemble a patch list, I'll call for a vote.

Brian

--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--
brian@organic.com brian@hyperreal.com http://www.[hyperreal,organic].com/

I cannot think of anything that has been mentioned, and there
isn't even an for_Apache_0.8.16 directory. Has our water broke?



> On Mon, 13 Nov 1995, Rob Hartill wrote:
> > I think Apache is about 9 months old now...
> >
> > time 1.0 was born.
>
> We've been in labor for about 3 months now.
>
> Can we assemble a final list of things to do to get it to 1.0?
>
> What are the outstanding, SHOWSTOPPING patches to 0.8.16?
>
> Where are we with updated documentation? I presume this was in drtr's
> area - I hope he's aware I've been making changes to the live
> www.apache.org tree as needs have dictated.
>
> The apache-users list is ready, 93 users and counting.
>
> And we're *ALL* ready to start adding more features.
>
> If someone can assemble a patch list, I'll call for a vote.
>
> Brian
>
> --=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--
> brian@organic.com brian@hyperreal.com http://www.[hyperreal,organic].com/

>
>
> I cannot think of anything that has been mentioned, and there
> isn't even an for_Apache_0.8.16 directory. Has our water broke?

Actually, there is a small patch from me in incoming, resulting from the
inclusion of all modules (specifically dbm auth) under SCO.

Cheers,

Ben.
>
>
>
> > On Mon, 13 Nov 1995, Rob Hartill wrote:
> > > I think Apache is about 9 months old now...
> > >
> > > time 1.0 was born.
> >
> > We've been in labor for about 3 months now.
> >
> > Can we assemble a final list of things to do to get it to 1.0?
> >
> > What are the outstanding, SHOWSTOPPING patches to 0.8.16?
> >
> > Where are we with updated documentation? I presume this was in drtr's
> > area - I hope he's aware I've been making changes to the live
> > www.apache.org tree as needs have dictated.
> >
> > The apache-users list is ready, 93 users and counting.
> >
> > And we're *ALL* ready to start adding more features.
> >
> > If someone can assemble a patch list, I'll call for a vote.
> >
> > Brian
> >
> > --=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--
> > brian@organic.com brian@hyperreal.com http://www.[hyperreal,organic].com/
>
>
>

--
Ben Laurie Phone: +44 (181) 994 6435
Freelance Consultant Fax: +44 (181) 994 6472
and Technical Director Email: ben@algroup.co.uk
A.L. Digital Ltd,
London, England.

I remember seeing the following:

The whole rash of alternative patches coming out of the // business
and associated trauma, including the patches to fix the CERT-related
patches one way or another (and they really ought to be fixed before
1.0).

A patch to clean up something in imagemap which came in too late
for the 0.8.16 vote.

A patch to eliminate core dumps when auth was specified without
any "require" lines.

The patch I sent in to keep "allow from good.com" from allowing in
people from nogood.com.

Ben's patch to the Config script.

Anything else?

rst

> I remember seeing the following:
>
> The whole rash of alternative patches coming out of the // business
> and associated trauma, including the patches to fix the CERT-related
> patches one way or another (and they really ought to be fixed before
> 1.0).
>
> A patch to clean up something in imagemap which came in too late
> for the 0.8.16 vote.
>
> A patch to eliminate core dumps when auth was specified without
> any "require" lines.
>
> The patch I sent in to keep "allow from good.com" from allowing in
> people from nogood.com.
>
> Ben's patch to the Config script.
>
> Anything else?

My patch for dbm auth to check *all* combinations of group...



*** mod_auth_dbm.c.orig Tue Oct 10 16:00:29 1995
--- mod_auth_dbm.c Mon Nov 6 15:15:02 1995
***************
*** 203,209 ****
w = getword(r->pool, &t, ' ');

if(!strcmp(w,"group") && sec->auth_dbmgrpfile) {
! char *groups,*v;

if (!(groups = get_dbm_grp(r, user, sec->auth_dbmgrpfile))) {
sprintf(errstr,"user %s not in DBM group file %s",
--- 203,209 ----
w = getword(r->pool, &t, ' ');

if(!strcmp(w,"group") && sec->auth_dbmgrpfile) {
! char *orig_groups,*groups,*v;

if (!(groups = get_dbm_grp(r, user, sec->auth_dbmgrpfile))) {
sprintf(errstr,"user %s not in DBM group file %s",
***************
*** 212,219 ****
--- 212,221 ----
note_basic_auth_failure (r);
return AUTH_REQUIRED;
}
+ orig_groups = groups;
while(t[0]) {
w = getword(r->pool, &t, ' ');
+ groups = orig_groups;
while(groups[0]) {
v = getword(r->pool, &groups,',');
if(!strcmp(v,w))