Mailing List Archive

Re: no more group file ?? (fwd)
no ack

Forwarded message:
> From ylam@wais.com Tue Oct 10 10:11:59 1995
> From: ylam@wais.com (Brian Lam yuk-fai)
> Message-Id: <9510101711.AA16406@wais.wais.com>
> Subject: Re: no more group file ??
> To: apache-bugs@hyperreal.com
> Date: Tue, 10 Oct 1995 10:11:45 -0700 (PDT)
> In-Reply-To: <199510061649.JAA13681@taz.hyperreal.com> from "Rob Hartill" at Oct 6, 95 09:49:13 am
> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
> Content-Type: text
> Content-Length: 1664
>
> Hi there,
> I find out that if I put something like :
> <limit post>
> require group my_group_file_name
> </limit>
>
> in my .htaccess file, apache-httpd.0.8.14 always respond authorization failed, although i am 100% sure i got the the correct group file and password.
> Error log said "password mismatch".
>
> If I use "reguire valid-user" then the problem goes away...
>
> My question is : apache-httpd.0.8.14 doesn't support "require group" or i have missed something stupid ??
>
> thanks !
>
>
> >
> > >
> > > Submitter: ylam@wais.com
> > > Operating system: SunOS 4.x, version:
> > > Extra Modules used:
> > > URL exhibiting problem:
> > >
> > > Symptoms:
> > > --
> > > Whenever connect to server, it response document contain no data. core file is produced. Error_log said : [Thu Oct 5 15:26:31 1995] Server configured -- resuming normal operations [Thu Oct 5 15:26:43 1995] httpd: caught SIGSEGV, dumping core [Thu Oct 5 15:28:33 1995] httpd: caught SIGSEGV, dumping core [Thu Oct 5 15:29:16 1995] httpd: caught SIGSEGV, dumping core [Thu Oct 5 15:29:27 1995] httpd: caught SIGSEGV, dumping core Document root is set up correctly. #Controls who can get stuff from this server. Authtype Basic AuthUserFile /home/ylam/brian_http/conf/.htpasswd AuthGroupFile /home/ylam/brian_http/conf/.htgroup AuthName Door <Limit GET> order deny,allow allow from all </Limit> Even with no "request" in <Limit> </Limit> the server always ask for password once connect This does not happen to old version like 0.6* or NCSA httpd
> > > --
> >
> > excuse the mess above, but that's the way I see it too.
> >
> > I think you need to say
> >
> > require valid-user
> >
> > inside the <Limit> </Limit>
> >
> > rob
> >
>
>