>
> > > if ((r->finfo.st_mode == 0 || (r->path_info && *r->path_info)) {
> >
> > Well, I inherited the "r->finfo.st_mode == 0", and I must say that I haven't
> > entirely decided what it means. So if it is that you doubt, feel free.
> > Otherwise I see nothing wrong.
>
> It doesn't compile. The () pairing is rong.
Sabotage!
Actually, this is most odd. The extra bracket (the first one) is NOT PRESENT
in the original patch (on my machine). The line reads:
if (r->finfo.st_mode == 0 || (r->path_info && *r->path_info)) {
in the original. How on Earth did that extra bracket get there? Obviously
it was not present when I generated the patch, I compiled and tested it!
And it certainly isn't there now. But it is there in the patches dir.
Did someone helpfully "correct" it?
> > Ben Laurie Phone: +44 (181) 994 6435
>
> Ay.
--
Ben Laurie Phone: +44 (181) 994 6435
Freelance Consultant Fax: +44 (181) 994 6472
and Technical Director Email: ben@algroup.co.uk
A.L. Digital Ltd,
London, England.