dgaudet 98/05/08 12:06:09
Modified: . STATUS
Log:
sorry ken, I changed my mind... radically.
Revision Changes Path
1.388 +10 -0 apache-1.3/STATUS
Index: STATUS
===================================================================
RCS file: /export/home/cvs/apache-1.3/STATUS,v
retrieving revision 1.387
retrieving revision 1.388
diff -u -r1.387 -r1.388
--- STATUS 1998/05/08 16:31:09 1.387
+++ STATUS 1998/05/08 19:06:08 1.388
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
A device checker patch had been sent to the list a while ago.
PATCH: <199805081628.MAA12929@devsys.jaguNET.com>
Status: Jim +1
+ Dean: -0 I really don't like the API change.
WIN32 1.3 FINAL RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS:
@@ -137,6 +138,15 @@
STATUS:
o Scrap it now that modules can use ap_add_version_component
Jim +1 (make sure this is clear :) ), Brian +1, Ken +1
+ Dean: -1, and I am also vetoing the new AddVersionComponent
+ directive. My reason is: if a module is "significant" then
+ it will ap_add_version_component(); if a patch is
+ "significant" then it can modify SERVER_SUBVERSION. There are
+ no other *code* changes possible that the admin should be
+ noting. If folks really want to play the customized server
+ version game they can recompile, or build a module to do it.
+ If we put it in the default server we'll end up seeing lots of
+ funny (read: annoying) false things start to appear.
* Paul would like to see a 'gdbm' option because he uses
it a lot.
Modified: . STATUS
Log:
sorry ken, I changed my mind... radically.
Revision Changes Path
1.388 +10 -0 apache-1.3/STATUS
Index: STATUS
===================================================================
RCS file: /export/home/cvs/apache-1.3/STATUS,v
retrieving revision 1.387
retrieving revision 1.388
diff -u -r1.387 -r1.388
--- STATUS 1998/05/08 16:31:09 1.387
+++ STATUS 1998/05/08 19:06:08 1.388
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
A device checker patch had been sent to the list a while ago.
PATCH: <199805081628.MAA12929@devsys.jaguNET.com>
Status: Jim +1
+ Dean: -0 I really don't like the API change.
WIN32 1.3 FINAL RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS:
@@ -137,6 +138,15 @@
STATUS:
o Scrap it now that modules can use ap_add_version_component
Jim +1 (make sure this is clear :) ), Brian +1, Ken +1
+ Dean: -1, and I am also vetoing the new AddVersionComponent
+ directive. My reason is: if a module is "significant" then
+ it will ap_add_version_component(); if a patch is
+ "significant" then it can modify SERVER_SUBVERSION. There are
+ no other *code* changes possible that the admin should be
+ noting. If folks really want to play the customized server
+ version game they can recompile, or build a module to do it.
+ If we put it in the default server we'll end up seeing lots of
+ funny (read: annoying) false things start to appear.
* Paul would like to see a 'gdbm' option because he uses
it a lot.