https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66480
--- Comment #1 from Eric Covener <covener@gmail.com> ---
I tried to add a contrast between the two directives here from what I could see
in the code/comments
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1907762
In trunk only, SSLUserName impacts how +fakebasicauth work. But in 2.4.x.
Similar to changing the timing of the mod_auth_basic directive, it seems like
it could have an adverse affect. It probably needs to be duplicated
(SSLFakeBasicUsername) to be improved safely. Alternatively, "AuthFakeBasic
expression [early]"
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org
--- Comment #1 from Eric Covener <covener@gmail.com> ---
I tried to add a contrast between the two directives here from what I could see
in the code/comments
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1907762
In trunk only, SSLUserName impacts how +fakebasicauth work. But in 2.4.x.
Similar to changing the timing of the mod_auth_basic directive, it seems like
it could have an adverse affect. It probably needs to be duplicated
(SSLFakeBasicUsername) to be improved safely. Alternatively, "AuthFakeBasic
expression [early]"
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org