DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9185>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9185
Downloaded files always corrupt on CYGWIN
------- Additional Comments From jwoolley@apache.org 2002-05-17 02:49 -------
We *could* do that, but how would you implement it? Well, okay, better
question. Which part are you saying is ugly? The 1.3 part? Okay, I'll agree
with that. But that's not autoconf. For the 2.0 part, why is that ugly? All
we're saying is that apr_file_open should respect the APR_BINARY flag if the
platform cares about it (in which case O_BINARY would be defined in fcntl.h).
The APR change seems totally right to me.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9185>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9185
Downloaded files always corrupt on CYGWIN
------- Additional Comments From jwoolley@apache.org 2002-05-17 02:49 -------
We *could* do that, but how would you implement it? Well, okay, better
question. Which part are you saying is ugly? The 1.3 part? Okay, I'll agree
with that. But that's not autoconf. For the 2.0 part, why is that ugly? All
we're saying is that apr_file_open should respect the APR_BINARY flag if the
platform cares about it (in which case O_BINARY would be defined in fcntl.h).
The APR change seems totally right to me.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org