DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7910>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7910
WSADuplicateSocket on starting the server
wrowe@apache.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From wrowe@apache.org 2002-04-17 23:17 -------
We have an experimental fix committed to 2.0.36-dev that will appear in the
next release. It will only affect some flavors of this problem on Windows
NT, 2K or XP (the solution will not work for 9x.)
I will likely post a test binary late tonight and advise folks to give it
a try before we incorporate in the forthcoming 2.0.36 rollout.
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7910>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7910
WSADuplicateSocket on starting the server
wrowe@apache.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From wrowe@apache.org 2002-04-17 23:17 -------
We have an experimental fix committed to 2.0.36-dev that will appear in the
next release. It will only affect some flavors of this problem on Windows
NT, 2K or XP (the solution will not work for 9x.)
I will likely post a test binary late tonight and advise folks to give it
a try before we incorporate in the forthcoming 2.0.36 rollout.