DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7838>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7838
Apache leaves shared memory segments and dies after unclean shutdown
------- Additional Comments From stas-apache@zend.com 2002-04-09 09:29 -------
I guess the solution may be to add shmctl(new_m->shmid, IPC_RMID, NULL) just
after shmat, like all other shmem-using tools do. Thus pre-removing shared
memory segment and making it be released as soon as all processes detach from
it. Am I missing something important here?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7838>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7838
Apache leaves shared memory segments and dies after unclean shutdown
------- Additional Comments From stas-apache@zend.com 2002-04-09 09:29 -------
I guess the solution may be to add shmctl(new_m->shmid, IPC_RMID, NULL) just
after shmat, like all other shmem-using tools do. Thus pre-removing shared
memory segment and making it be released as soon as all processes detach from
it. Am I missing something important here?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org