Mailing List Archive

Grzasko, James (RBI-UK) <James.Grzasko@reedinfo.co.uk> wrote:
> Hello!
>
>
> We are seeing the figure -21474836.-48 appearing in the %bytes field
> in our analog reports (see below for examples). We have 2 websites
> which we run analog reports on and it seems to randomly occur in the
> reports for both of them. The problem has only start happening in
> the last few months, the reports had been working fine for a number
> of years previously.
>
> 178: -21474836.-48%: 31/May/08 09:02: /ukcd/default.asp

I have no idea, but in this case, I'd certainly try to pull these 178 lines into a seperate logfile, and see if what Analog has to say when it's just analyzing those lines.

Aengus

+------------------------------------------------------------------------
| TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list:
| http://lists.meer.net/mailman/listinfo/analog-help
|
| Analog Documentation: http://analog.cx/docs/Readme.html
| List archives: http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives
| Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general
+------------------------------------------------------------------------

2008/6/25 Grzasko, James (RBI-UK) <James.Grzasko@reedinfo.co.uk>:
> Hello!
>
> We are seeing the figure -21474836.-48 appearing in the %bytes field in our
> analog reports (see below for examples). We have 2 websites which we run
> analog reports on and it seems to randomly occur in the reports for both of
> them. The problem has only start happening in the last few months, the
> reports had been working fine for a number of years previously.
>
> Any help gratefully accepted!
>
> James Grzasko
>
> Request Report
>
> reqs: %bytes: last time: file
>
> ----: ------: ---------------: ----
>
> 262: 0.05%: 30/May/08 15:16: /scaddcon/generalclearinginfo.asp
>
> 208: 0.17%: 31/May/08 19:15: /scaddcon/orderform.pdf
>
> 194: 0.04%: 31/May/08 22:58: /scaddcon/privacypolicy.asp
>
> 184: : 30/May/08 16:08: /scaddcon/clearinginfo/hsbc+bank+plc.asp
>
> 178: -21474836.-48%: 31/May/08 09:02: /ukcd/default.asp
>
> 168: 0.07%: 31/May/08 10:21: /newuser.asp
>

That is very curious. It's obviously a bug, but I can't see how it can
have happened. Is your logfile small enough to email to me
(privately)?

--
Stephen Turner
+------------------------------------------------------------------------
| TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list:
| http://lists.meer.net/mailman/listinfo/analog-help
|
| Analog Documentation: http://analog.cx/docs/Readme.html
| List archives: http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives
| Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general
+------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi Stephen

I managed to identify an offending logfile and can consistently
reproduce the error on our reports server. However I then tried running
the same report on my local PC and it worked fine (no -21474836.-48%
figures coming out). The only change to our report server was the
installation of .NET 3.5 a few months back. The reports server is Win
2003 versus Win XP on my desktop (which also has .NET 3.5). I will see
about removing .NET 3.5 from the reports server and see if this helps.

Thanks

James Grzasko
Web Developer
Reed Business Information
+44 01342 336111


-----Original Message-----
From: analog-help-bounces@lists.meer.net
[mailto:analog-help-bounces@lists.meer.net] On Behalf Of Stephen Turner
Sent: 29 June 2008 09:36
To: Support for analog web log analyzer
Subject: Re: [analog-help] -21474836.-48% in %bytes field

2008/6/25 Grzasko, James (RBI-UK) <James.Grzasko@reedinfo.co.uk>:
> Hello!
>
> We are seeing the figure -21474836.-48 appearing in the %bytes field
in our
> analog reports (see below for examples). We have 2 websites which we
run
> analog reports on and it seems to randomly occur in the reports for
both of
> them. The problem has only start happening in the last few months, the
> reports had been working fine for a number of years previously.
>
> Any help gratefully accepted!
>
> James Grzasko
>
> Request Report
>
> reqs: %bytes: last time: file
>
> ----: ------: ---------------: ----
>
> 262: 0.05%: 30/May/08 15:16: /scaddcon/generalclearinginfo.asp
>
> 208: 0.17%: 31/May/08 19:15: /scaddcon/orderform.pdf
>
> 194: 0.04%: 31/May/08 22:58: /scaddcon/privacypolicy.asp
>
> 184: : 30/May/08 16:08:
/scaddcon/clearinginfo/hsbc+bank+plc.asp
>
> 178: -21474836.-48%: 31/May/08 09:02: /ukcd/default.asp
>
> 168: 0.07%: 31/May/08 10:21: /newuser.asp
>

That is very curious. It's obviously a bug, but I can't see how it can
have happened. Is your logfile small enough to email to me
(privately)?

--
Stephen Turner
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
| TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list:
| http://lists.meer.net/mailman/listinfo/analog-help
|
| Analog Documentation: http://analog.cx/docs/Readme.html
| List archives: http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives
| Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-

r===================== DISCLAIMER ======================
This message is intended only for the use of the person(s)
("Intended Recipient") to whom it is addressed. It may contain
information, which is privileged and confidential. Accordingly
any dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of this
message or any of its content by any person other than the Intended
Recipient may constitute a breach of civil or criminal law and is
strictly prohibited. If you are not the Intended Recipient, please
contact the sender as soon as possible.

Reed Business Information Limited.
Registered Office: Quadrant House, The Quadrant, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5AS, UK.
Registered in England under Company No. 151537

=======================================================


+------------------------------------------------------------------------
| TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list:
| http://lists.meer.net/mailman/listinfo/analog-help
|
| Analog Documentation: http://analog.cx/docs/Readme.html
| List archives: http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives
| Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general
+------------------------------------------------------------------------

Grzasko, James (RBI-UK) <James.Grzasko@reedinfo.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi Stephen
>
> I managed to identify an offending logfile and can consistently
> reproduce the error on our reports server. However I then tried
> running
> the same report on my local PC and it worked fine (no -21474836.-48%
> figures coming out). The only change to our report server was the
> installation of .NET 3.5 a few months back. The reports server is Win
> 2003 versus Win XP on my desktop (which also has .NET 3.5). I will see
> about removing .NET 3.5 from the reports server and see if this helps.

It might be easier to install a clean copy of Analog in a different directory on the server, and see if that works - it won't even require a reboot of the server :-).


Aengus

+------------------------------------------------------------------------
| TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list:
| http://lists.meer.net/mailman/listinfo/analog-help
|
| Analog Documentation: http://analog.cx/docs/Readme.html
| List archives: http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives
| Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general
+------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analog is not built on the .NET Framework so this should have no bearing on what Analog does. (Unless you installed the SDK with dev/debug tools which I assume you wouldn't do on a server.)

--

Jeremy Wadsack
Seven Simple Machines

-----Original Message-----
From: analog-help-bounces@lists.meer.net [mailto:analog-help-bounces@lists.meer.net] On Behalf Of Aengus
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 10:18 AM
To: Support for analog web log analyzer
Subject: Re: [analog-help] -21474836.-48% in %bytes field

Grzasko, James (RBI-UK) <James.Grzasko@reedinfo.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi Stephen
>
> I managed to identify an offending logfile and can consistently
> reproduce the error on our reports server. However I then tried
> running
> the same report on my local PC and it worked fine (no -21474836.-48%
> figures coming out). The only change to our report server was the
> installation of .NET 3.5 a few months back. The reports server is Win
> 2003 versus Win XP on my desktop (which also has .NET 3.5). I will see
> about removing .NET 3.5 from the reports server and see if this helps.

It might be easier to install a clean copy of Analog in a different directory on the server, and see if that works - it won't even require a reboot of the server :-).


Aengus

+------------------------------------------------------------------------
| TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list:
| http://lists.meer.net/mailman/listinfo/analog-help
|
| Analog Documentation: http://analog.cx/docs/Readme.html
| List archives: http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives
| Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general
+------------------------------------------------------------------------

+------------------------------------------------------------------------
| TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list:
| http://lists.meer.net/mailman/listinfo/analog-help
|
| Analog Documentation: http://analog.cx/docs/Readme.html
| List archives: http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives
| Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general
+------------------------------------------------------------------------

Aengus <analog07@eircom.net> wrote:

> Grzasko, James (RBI-UK) <James.Grzasko@reedinfo.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> Hi Stephen
>> I managed to identify an offending logfile and can consistently
>> reproduce the error on our reports server. However I then tried
>> running
>> the same report on my local PC and it worked fine (no -21474836.-48%
>> figures coming out). The only change to our report server was the
>> installation of .NET 3.5 a few months back. The reports server is Win
>> 2003 versus Win XP on my desktop (which also has .NET 3.5). I will see
>> about removing .NET 3.5 from the reports server and see if this helps.
>
> It might be easier to install a clean copy of Analog in a different
> directory on the server, and see if that works - it won't even require a
> reboot of the server :-). Aengus

I got strange results (big values, sometimes negative) using Analog
compiled under gcc 3, gcc 2.95 solved my problems.

Przemek
+------------------------------------------------------------------------
| TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list:
| http://lists.meer.net/mailman/listinfo/analog-help
|
| Analog Documentation: http://analog.cx/docs/Readme.html
| List archives: http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives
| Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general
+------------------------------------------------------------------------