Hi Jonathan,
With regard to the point 2, issuing scholarships early, how early is a
question. Most countries, if not all, only allows one to apply no more than
3 months prior to their intended date of travel, so notifying recipients 6
months in advance is not going to help them in anyways.
We need to learn the reason provided by visa processing agency for the
rejection, which can help others decide what to submit and what to expect.
I think in this thread also I have missed that if anyone mentioned the
official reason provided to them. I see points made about
invitation/sponsorship letter sent from US for Canada visa here but
uncertain whether that was officially the reason for rejection.
Regards,
Dhaval Vyas
On 4 Jul 2017 16:45, "Jonathan Cardy" <werespielchequers@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Levin,
>
> Of your three points:
>
> 1 Is good, but I can remember one winning bid where there was a very
> strong reassurance at the bid stage which then didn't really work out well
> during the organisation stage. I'm not going to name the bid, but I will
> say that people ask questions and not every answer is 100% delivered. If
> questions have not been asked recently we need to start asking them again (
> I don't know if this was looked at during Montreal, I look at lots of
> Wikimania bids and often ask about visas, I don't remember looking at the
> Montreal bid).
>
> 2 Is a problem, some of the people who are going to have most difficulty
> getting visas are people who can only afford to come if they get a
> scholarship. Moving the whole scholarship process forward so we know who is
> going to come earlier would lose spontaneity of the event for others though
> it would help some get visas. But there are two things we could do. Firstly
> we could offer scholarships now to next year's Wikimania to scholarship
> recipients who couldn't get visas to Montreal (and do that each year - this
> is not a new problem or an easy one). Secondly we could move the
> scholarship process forward for people coming from countries where visas
> are likely to be slow to get for the next Wikimania. That could mean two
> rounds of scholarship applications, one for one group of countries and a
> few months later for people from other countries. Not perfect but practical
> and probably helpful.
>
> 3 I'm pretty sure there has been analysis, at least to the level of number
> of non attendees due to visa failure per Wikimania. For Privacy reasons we
> need to be very careful with any more detailed data, but that number should
> be known and each Wikimania team should be aiming to be low on that list.
>
>
> Regards
>
> Jonathan
>
>
> On 4 Jul 2017, at 13:13, Levon Azizian <levonazizian@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> Regarding mentioned, I have some suggestions on mitigation risks for the
> future what could be done.
>
> 1. Visa support should be an important component for hosting community.
> Thus, during the bidding process of new location of Wikimania (or other
> huge event), each proposal of location should be considered not only from
> the prospective of visa-friendly policy, but on preliminary negotiations
> between local chapter (community) and local authorities (MFA or whatever).
> Thus, if let's say community of New Zealand get some positive negotiation's
> result from MFA of NZ on participant's visa support, it should be
> considered as a plus for this bid.
> 2. After the bid was chosen, local team should provide to local
> authorities the list of all participants who will participate at event and
> make sure that central authorities will transfer the lists to embassies and
> this lists will make a sense when decision on visa is made by embassy.
> Maybe it is not the most interesting thing, but hosting communities should
> take care on ability of their guests to visit the country,
> 3. Analysis of history of visa applications of Wiki(m/p)edians. As I
> understand, we never did such analysis and it could be useful as for passed
> event, and for future events as well.
>
> Regards,
> Levon Azizian
> Wikimedia Ukraine
>
> 2017-07-04 15:02 GMT+03:00 Harry Mitchell <hjmwiki@gmail.com>:
>
>> It strikes me that it would be helpful to focus on how we can improve the
>> visa process for attendees from (predominantly) African and Asian countries
>> rather than trying to find a utopia that has a very relaxed visa policy
>> *and* a palatable government *and* political stability *and* modern
>> infrastructure/transport links *and* is not excessively expensive for most
>> people to get to. It's certainly not helpful t pounce on people for making
>> good-faith suggestions, even if you think the suggestion is ludicrous.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikimania-l mailing list
>> Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimania-l mailing list
> Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimania-l mailing list
> Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l
>
>
With regard to the point 2, issuing scholarships early, how early is a
question. Most countries, if not all, only allows one to apply no more than
3 months prior to their intended date of travel, so notifying recipients 6
months in advance is not going to help them in anyways.
We need to learn the reason provided by visa processing agency for the
rejection, which can help others decide what to submit and what to expect.
I think in this thread also I have missed that if anyone mentioned the
official reason provided to them. I see points made about
invitation/sponsorship letter sent from US for Canada visa here but
uncertain whether that was officially the reason for rejection.
Regards,
Dhaval Vyas
On 4 Jul 2017 16:45, "Jonathan Cardy" <werespielchequers@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Levin,
>
> Of your three points:
>
> 1 Is good, but I can remember one winning bid where there was a very
> strong reassurance at the bid stage which then didn't really work out well
> during the organisation stage. I'm not going to name the bid, but I will
> say that people ask questions and not every answer is 100% delivered. If
> questions have not been asked recently we need to start asking them again (
> I don't know if this was looked at during Montreal, I look at lots of
> Wikimania bids and often ask about visas, I don't remember looking at the
> Montreal bid).
>
> 2 Is a problem, some of the people who are going to have most difficulty
> getting visas are people who can only afford to come if they get a
> scholarship. Moving the whole scholarship process forward so we know who is
> going to come earlier would lose spontaneity of the event for others though
> it would help some get visas. But there are two things we could do. Firstly
> we could offer scholarships now to next year's Wikimania to scholarship
> recipients who couldn't get visas to Montreal (and do that each year - this
> is not a new problem or an easy one). Secondly we could move the
> scholarship process forward for people coming from countries where visas
> are likely to be slow to get for the next Wikimania. That could mean two
> rounds of scholarship applications, one for one group of countries and a
> few months later for people from other countries. Not perfect but practical
> and probably helpful.
>
> 3 I'm pretty sure there has been analysis, at least to the level of number
> of non attendees due to visa failure per Wikimania. For Privacy reasons we
> need to be very careful with any more detailed data, but that number should
> be known and each Wikimania team should be aiming to be low on that list.
>
>
> Regards
>
> Jonathan
>
>
> On 4 Jul 2017, at 13:13, Levon Azizian <levonazizian@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> Regarding mentioned, I have some suggestions on mitigation risks for the
> future what could be done.
>
> 1. Visa support should be an important component for hosting community.
> Thus, during the bidding process of new location of Wikimania (or other
> huge event), each proposal of location should be considered not only from
> the prospective of visa-friendly policy, but on preliminary negotiations
> between local chapter (community) and local authorities (MFA or whatever).
> Thus, if let's say community of New Zealand get some positive negotiation's
> result from MFA of NZ on participant's visa support, it should be
> considered as a plus for this bid.
> 2. After the bid was chosen, local team should provide to local
> authorities the list of all participants who will participate at event and
> make sure that central authorities will transfer the lists to embassies and
> this lists will make a sense when decision on visa is made by embassy.
> Maybe it is not the most interesting thing, but hosting communities should
> take care on ability of their guests to visit the country,
> 3. Analysis of history of visa applications of Wiki(m/p)edians. As I
> understand, we never did such analysis and it could be useful as for passed
> event, and for future events as well.
>
> Regards,
> Levon Azizian
> Wikimedia Ukraine
>
> 2017-07-04 15:02 GMT+03:00 Harry Mitchell <hjmwiki@gmail.com>:
>
>> It strikes me that it would be helpful to focus on how we can improve the
>> visa process for attendees from (predominantly) African and Asian countries
>> rather than trying to find a utopia that has a very relaxed visa policy
>> *and* a palatable government *and* political stability *and* modern
>> infrastructure/transport links *and* is not excessively expensive for most
>> people to get to. It's certainly not helpful t pounce on people for making
>> good-faith suggestions, even if you think the suggestion is ludicrous.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikimania-l mailing list
>> Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimania-l mailing list
> Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimania-l mailing list
> Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l
>
>