Mailing List Archive

[Wikimedia-l] Re: Sharing more details about the Equity Fund
Thank you Lisa, Janeen, Tony and the Equity Fund Committee for working on
this pilot project.

Some of the major barriers preventing more people from joining our movement
are barriers of power and privilege. In many parts of the world, that
correlates with histories of racial discrimination and inequality. The
Board of the Wikimedia Foundation supported this idea as a way for us as a
Movement, not only an organisation, to directly address these obstacles and
hopefully bring new partners and newcomers into our movement.

As a Wikipedian I know that having good reliable sources is crucial. As a
Ukrainian Wikipedia volunteer I know that sometimes these good reliable
sources are just manuscripts collecting dust in some drawers, as people who
do research do not always get the support they need, so they do not
publish. And thus we editors cannot use those sources. And I am positive my
experience is not unique. I imagine that in some countries and communities
this can be even harder because of the obstacles mentioned above.

I hope that through this pilot program, Wikimedia can support work to
improve access to knowledge where the need is great. And I am sure we
(collectively) will learn a lot while trying something new, and that would
influence how we pursue these issues in the future. I would like to think
that our efforts would not be futile and that we could change things and
(at some point) all people would be able to share in the sum of all
knowledge, not just privileged ones.


Best regards,
antanana / Nataliia Tymkiv
Acting Chair, Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees

*NOTICE: You may have received this message outside of your normal working
hours/days, as I usually can work more as a volunteer during weekend. You
should not feel obligated to answer it during your days off. Thank you in
advance!*



On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 8:15 PM Lisa Gruwell <lgruwell@wikimedia.org> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> I’m excited to share more information about the Wikimedia Foundation’s
> Knowledge Equity Fund.
>
> The Equity Fund is a pilot initiative that came out of the commitment the
> Foundation’s leadership team made in June 2020 [1] in the wake of global
> protests against racial injustice. Our goal was to create a grant-making
> fund with an explicit focus on addressing barriers to free knowledge
> experienced by Black, indigenous and communities of color around the world.
>
> This is a $4.5 million USD fund to address racial inequities that impact
> the work of free knowledge. It was created to provide focused grants to
> organizations that are advancing knowledge equity, one of two key pillars
> of our 2030 strategic direction of becoming the essential infrastructure of
> free knowledge. Specifically, the fund is meant to support organizations
> working to address the racial injustices and barriers that prevent
> participation in free knowledge.
>
> We allocated funds for the Equity Fund at the end of the Foundation’s
> fiscal year last June. [2] It took more time than we expected to share our
> plans for this pilot program, as we’ve been navigating the operational
> and logistical issues of creating a new type of fund. Over the past
> several months since the Equity Fund was first announced, Foundation staff
> and volunteers have been meeting to discuss the goals and the details of
> the Equity Fund, and we finally have more to share.
>
> The Equity Fund will be used to support local and international
> organizations that don’t currently qualify for grants funding from the
> Foundation, such as external organizations that can help advance our
> mission and are not working directly on wikiprojects. We recognize that the
> work of knowledge equity is work that we as a movement cannot do alone. Our
> projects can only do so much when, for example, academic and mass media
> representation of marginalized communities remains insufficient, which in
> turn limits citations and primary sources for us to build from. Through
> Equity Fund investments, we wish to create an ecosystem of partners,
> collaborators, and grantees working on knowledge equity that will benefit
> the movement. This could include journalism projects to increase content
> about underrepresented regions of the world, or scholarship and research
> initiatives that are focused on expanding academic understanding of
> structural barriers to knowledge and potential solutions.
>
> The Equity Fund is separate from the grants that are available for
> community groups and the ongoing Grants Relaunch [3]. It is a new pool of
> funds that we can use to directly impact knowledge equity, and specifically
> barriers due to race that prevent access and participation in free
> knowledge.
>
> We are currently working to identify the first grant recipients for the
> Equity Fund. The Meta page for the Equity Fund [4] includes more
> information (the members of the Equity Fund Committee, the five specific
> focus areas we will be investing in) and next steps. We are also currently
> looking for recommendations on organizations for grants - you can visit
> Meta or fill out this survey [5] if you have organizations that are already
> doing this work and would be a good fit.
>
> Lastly, we do want to emphasize that this is a pilot. There are a lot of
> open questions that have been raised by community members that we are still
> figuring out, on topics such as ensuring investment in global organizations
> and inclusive definitions of racial equity. We welcome additional questions
> as the project evolves from this early stage. We’re answering questions on
> Meta, so please join us there. We will also be hosting Office Hours in the
> coming week:
>
> -
>
> Monday, June 13 at 0100-0200 UTC meet.google.com/myf-zcaw-ubg
> -
>
> Monday, June 13 at 1500-1600 UTC meet.google.com/dzu-edej-wva
>
>
> This is an active step towards addressing the barriers that perpetuate
> knowledge gaps on our projects and prevent participation in free knowledge.
> We’re excited to try this new pilot and share our progress.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Lisa Gruwell, Janeen Uzzell, Tony Sebro and the Equity Fund Committee
>
>
> [1]
> https://medium.com/freely-sharing-the-sum-of-all-knowledge/we-stand-for-racial-justice-49c31afbabca?source=collection_home---4------6-----------------------
>
>
> [2]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2020-December/096022.html
>
>
> [3]
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Community_Resources/Grants_Strategy_Relaunch_2020-2021
>
>
> [4] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Equity_Fund
>
> [5] https://forms.gle/gzqRH7yMFEGgZb4e6
>
>
> --
>
> Lisa Seitz Gruwell
>
> Chief Advancement Officer
>
> Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines
> at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
[Wikimedia-l] Re: Sharing more details about the Equity Fund [ In reply to ]
On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 18:15, Lisa Gruwell <lgruwell@wikimedia.org> wrote:

> We are currently working to identify the first grant recipients for the
> Equity Fund. The Meta page for the Equity Fund [4] includes more
> information (the members of the Equity Fund Committee, the five specific
> focus areas we will be investing in) and next steps.
>

For those who want to jump straight to what the foundation plans to spend
the money on:


1. Supporting scholarship & advocacy focused on free knowledge and
racial equity
2. Supporting media and journalism efforts focused on people of color
around the world, in order to expand reliable media sources covering these
communities
3. Addressing unequal internet access
4. Improving digital literacy skills that impede access to knowledge
5. Investing in non-traditional records of knowledge (i.e. oral
histories)


1 is vauge and a lot depends on the balance between the two. As far as 2
goes funding journalism is bit of a departure from our standard pratices
and contains significant risks. 3 isn't really viable at our kind of
funding levels and has significant enviromental concerns. 4 Again not
really viable at our funding levels (also english language lessions would
have more impact). 5 runs into the issue that the community has not
historicaly proven accepting of attempts to lower RS and notability
standards for non western areas.



--
geni
[Wikimedia-l] Re: Sharing more details about the Equity Fund [ In reply to ]
Lisa + all -- Excellent to see this take shape. It pairs well with a
vintage CSB
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Countering_systemic_bias>
...

Thank you for putting out a call for potential projects to support. I'll
think more on it before filling out the form
<https://forms.gle/gzqRH7yMFEGgZb4e6>; some categories that come to mind
that can't happen on-wiki projects today:
* Reliable secondary sources that write prolifically about
under-documented people and projects
* Reliable interlocutors that record and index oral and other histories,
and under-documented languages (cf Rosetta and PanLex)
* Making representative subsets of essential collections available
digitally (ex.
<https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/hundreds-native-american-treaties-digitized-and-online-first-time-180976056/>)
+ under a free license. (ex.
<https://news.artnet.com/art-world/getty-wins-jet-ebony-archives-auction-1606687>
)

Sam.

PS - some thoughts on your comments, Geni:

Geni writes:
> 3 [internet access] isn't really viable at our kind of funding levels and
has significant enviromental concerns.

Efforts to get libraries online, in regions whose lit + historical + public
records are underrepresented on the searchable web, is quite impactful as
part of digitization + mirroring efforts. Many regional groups work in
collab w existing infrastructure-efforts providing the bandwidth [such as
Giga <https://www.unicef.org/innovation/giga>]

> 4 [digital literacy] Again not really viable at our funding levels

Not my experience; especially as knowledge propagates like a taper flame.

> (also english language lessions would have more impact).

I imagine this is not meant to be limited to the english-speaking world and
projects.

> 5 [non-traditional records of knowledge] runs into the issue that the
community has not historicaly proven accepting of attempts to lower RS and
notability standards for non western areas.

This comment seems a bit off-topic. These grants as described are not
constrained by what is accepted by current wiki projects; archiving and
indexing non-traditional records allows them to be cited and allows the
archives to become recognized as reliable sources; only a few
project-language-editions to my knowledge have been prickly about engaging
with oral histories, and such records exist in every culture and part of
the world.
<https://news.artnet.com/art-world/getty-wins-jet-ebony-archives-auction-1606687>


????????????????

On Wed., Jun. 9, 2021, 1:15 p.m. Lisa Gruwell, <lgruwell@wikimedia.org>
wrote:

>
> This is a $4.5 million USD fund to address racial inequities that impact
> the work of free knowledge. It was created to provide focused grants to
> organizations that are advancing knowledge equity, one of two key pillars
> of our 2030 strategic direction of becoming the essential infrastructure of
> free knowledge. Specifically, the fund is meant to support organizations
> working to address the racial injustices and barriers that prevent
> participation in free knowledge.
>
>
> [4] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Equity_Fund
>
> [5] https://forms.gle/gzqRH7yMFEGgZb4e6
>
[Wikimedia-l] Re: Sharing more details about the Equity Fund [ In reply to ]
Hi all,

We realized we had shared the wrong date for the Equity Fund Office Hours.
Lisa's email initially said these would be Monday, June 13 - that should be
Monday, June 14. Sorry for any confusion - Updated times below. You can
also find these details and more information on Meta:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Equity_Fund


-

Monday, June 14 at 0100-0200 UTC meet.google.com/myf-zcaw-ubg
-

Monday, June 14 at 1500-1600 UTC meet.google.com/dzu-edej-wva

?

On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 10:15 AM Lisa Gruwell <lgruwell@wikimedia.org> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> I’m excited to share more information about the Wikimedia Foundation’s
> Knowledge Equity Fund.
>
> The Equity Fund is a pilot initiative that came out of the commitment the
> Foundation’s leadership team made in June 2020 [1] in the wake of global
> protests against racial injustice. Our goal was to create a grant-making
> fund with an explicit focus on addressing barriers to free knowledge
> experienced by Black, indigenous and communities of color around the world.
>
> This is a $4.5 million USD fund to address racial inequities that impact
> the work of free knowledge. It was created to provide focused grants to
> organizations that are advancing knowledge equity, one of two key pillars
> of our 2030 strategic direction of becoming the essential infrastructure of
> free knowledge. Specifically, the fund is meant to support organizations
> working to address the racial injustices and barriers that prevent
> participation in free knowledge.
>
> We allocated funds for the Equity Fund at the end of the Foundation’s
> fiscal year last June. [2] It took more time than we expected to share our
> plans for this pilot program, as we’ve been navigating the operational
> and logistical issues of creating a new type of fund. Over the past
> several months since the Equity Fund was first announced, Foundation staff
> and volunteers have been meeting to discuss the goals and the details of
> the Equity Fund, and we finally have more to share.
>
> The Equity Fund will be used to support local and international
> organizations that don’t currently qualify for grants funding from the
> Foundation, such as external organizations that can help advance our
> mission and are not working directly on wikiprojects. We recognize that the
> work of knowledge equity is work that we as a movement cannot do alone. Our
> projects can only do so much when, for example, academic and mass media
> representation of marginalized communities remains insufficient, which in
> turn limits citations and primary sources for us to build from. Through
> Equity Fund investments, we wish to create an ecosystem of partners,
> collaborators, and grantees working on knowledge equity that will benefit
> the movement. This could include journalism projects to increase content
> about underrepresented regions of the world, or scholarship and research
> initiatives that are focused on expanding academic understanding of
> structural barriers to knowledge and potential solutions.
>
> The Equity Fund is separate from the grants that are available for
> community groups and the ongoing Grants Relaunch [3]. It is a new pool of
> funds that we can use to directly impact knowledge equity, and specifically
> barriers due to race that prevent access and participation in free
> knowledge.
>
> We are currently working to identify the first grant recipients for the
> Equity Fund. The Meta page for the Equity Fund [4] includes more
> information (the members of the Equity Fund Committee, the five specific
> focus areas we will be investing in) and next steps. We are also currently
> looking for recommendations on organizations for grants - you can visit
> Meta or fill out this survey [5] if you have organizations that are already
> doing this work and would be a good fit.
>
> Lastly, we do want to emphasize that this is a pilot. There are a lot of
> open questions that have been raised by community members that we are still
> figuring out, on topics such as ensuring investment in global organizations
> and inclusive definitions of racial equity. We welcome additional questions
> as the project evolves from this early stage. We’re answering questions on
> Meta, so please join us there. We will also be hosting Office Hours in the
> coming week:
>
> -
>
> Monday, June 13 at 0100-0200 UTC meet.google.com/myf-zcaw-ubg
> -
>
> Monday, June 13 at 1500-1600 UTC meet.google.com/dzu-edej-wva
>
>
> This is an active step towards addressing the barriers that perpetuate
> knowledge gaps on our projects and prevent participation in free knowledge.
> We’re excited to try this new pilot and share our progress.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Lisa Gruwell, Janeen Uzzell, Tony Sebro and the Equity Fund Committee
>
>
> [1]
> https://medium.com/freely-sharing-the-sum-of-all-knowledge/we-stand-for-racial-justice-49c31afbabca?source=collection_home---4------6-----------------------
>
>
> [2]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2020-December/096022.html
>
>
> [3]
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Community_Resources/Grants_Strategy_Relaunch_2020-2021
>
>
> [4] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Equity_Fund
>
> [5] https://forms.gle/gzqRH7yMFEGgZb4e6
>
>
> --
>
> Lisa Seitz Gruwell
>
> Chief Advancement Officer
>
> Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines
> at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org



--
*Nadee Gunasena*
Executive Communications Manager
Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
[Wikimedia-l] Re: Sharing more details about the Equity Fund [ In reply to ]
Hi Lisa and all,

Thanks for the info.

Laudable though the goals of the Knowledge Equity Fund surely are, you seem
to be saying that you gave $4.5 million – which readers presumably donated
because they thought you were struggling to have enough money to keep
Wikipedia up and running – to Tides Advocacy for the kind of "dismantling
inequities" work that Tides Advocacy does anyway.[1]

If donors had wanted to support Tides Advocacy's racial equity work, surely
they could have donated to that organisation in the first place?

Have you announced – or will you announce – this redirection of funds to
the public, complete with an explanation of how this decision came about
(i.e. as a result of last year's underspend, as described in your mail last
December)?[2] At the time of writing, a Google search is unable to locate a
related Wikimedia blog post or press release.

Without such a public communication, donors will not even be aware that
money they gave in response to banners asking for donations "to protect
Wikipedia's independence" etc. is now going to be used for a different
purpose altogether, one that is expressly outside of the scope of the
conventional Wikimedia community grants that they might reasonably have
expected their money to be used for.[3]

Moreover, at some point, Wikipedia readers will no doubt be asked to donate
another $4.5 million to meet expenses these funds could have covered (such
as the most recent $5 million WMF donation to the endowment).

Do you agree donors should be told?

Best,
Andreas

[1] https://tidesadvocacy.org
[2]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/XI5A4FKDJUK3VWOQWZIPIZXMWAMIX5IW/
[3]
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Equity_Fund/Frequently_asked_questions#9._How_will_the_Equity_Fund_work_with_existing_grants_programmes
?

On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 6:42 PM Nadee Gunasena <ngunasena@wikimedia.org>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> We realized we had shared the wrong date for the Equity Fund Office Hours.
> Lisa's email initially said these would be Monday, June 13 - that should be
> Monday, June 14. Sorry for any confusion - Updated times below. You can
> also find these details and more information on Meta:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Equity_Fund
>
>
> -
>
> Monday, June 14 at 0100-0200 UTC meet.google.com/myf-zcaw-ubg
> -
>
> Monday, June 14 at 1500-1600 UTC meet.google.com/dzu-edej-wva
>
> ?
>
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 10:15 AM Lisa Gruwell <lgruwell@wikimedia.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I’m excited to share more information about the Wikimedia Foundation’s
>> Knowledge Equity Fund.
>>
>> The Equity Fund is a pilot initiative that came out of the commitment the
>> Foundation’s leadership team made in June 2020 [1] in the wake of global
>> protests against racial injustice. Our goal was to create a grant-making
>> fund with an explicit focus on addressing barriers to free knowledge
>> experienced by Black, indigenous and communities of color around the world.
>>
>> This is a $4.5 million USD fund to address racial inequities that impact
>> the work of free knowledge. It was created to provide focused grants to
>> organizations that are advancing knowledge equity, one of two key pillars
>> of our 2030 strategic direction of becoming the essential infrastructure of
>> free knowledge. Specifically, the fund is meant to support organizations
>> working to address the racial injustices and barriers that prevent
>> participation in free knowledge.
>>
>> We allocated funds for the Equity Fund at the end of the Foundation’s
>> fiscal year last June. [2] It took more time than we expected to share our
>> plans for this pilot program, as we’ve been navigating the operational
>> and logistical issues of creating a new type of fund. Over the past
>> several months since the Equity Fund was first announced, Foundation staff
>> and volunteers have been meeting to discuss the goals and the details of
>> the Equity Fund, and we finally have more to share.
>>
>> The Equity Fund will be used to support local and international
>> organizations that don’t currently qualify for grants funding from the
>> Foundation, such as external organizations that can help advance our
>> mission and are not working directly on wikiprojects. We recognize that the
>> work of knowledge equity is work that we as a movement cannot do alone. Our
>> projects can only do so much when, for example, academic and mass media
>> representation of marginalized communities remains insufficient, which in
>> turn limits citations and primary sources for us to build from. Through
>> Equity Fund investments, we wish to create an ecosystem of partners,
>> collaborators, and grantees working on knowledge equity that will benefit
>> the movement. This could include journalism projects to increase content
>> about underrepresented regions of the world, or scholarship and research
>> initiatives that are focused on expanding academic understanding of
>> structural barriers to knowledge and potential solutions.
>>
>> The Equity Fund is separate from the grants that are available for
>> community groups and the ongoing Grants Relaunch [3]. It is a new pool of
>> funds that we can use to directly impact knowledge equity, and specifically
>> barriers due to race that prevent access and participation in free
>> knowledge.
>>
>> We are currently working to identify the first grant recipients for the
>> Equity Fund. The Meta page for the Equity Fund [4] includes more
>> information (the members of the Equity Fund Committee, the five specific
>> focus areas we will be investing in) and next steps. We are also currently
>> looking for recommendations on organizations for grants - you can visit
>> Meta or fill out this survey [5] if you have organizations that are already
>> doing this work and would be a good fit.
>>
>> Lastly, we do want to emphasize that this is a pilot. There are a lot of
>> open questions that have been raised by community members that we are still
>> figuring out, on topics such as ensuring investment in global organizations
>> and inclusive definitions of racial equity. We welcome additional questions
>> as the project evolves from this early stage. We’re answering questions on
>> Meta, so please join us there. We will also be hosting Office Hours in the
>> coming week:
>>
>> -
>>
>> Monday, June 13 at 0100-0200 UTC meet.google.com/myf-zcaw-ubg
>> -
>>
>> Monday, June 13 at 1500-1600 UTC meet.google.com/dzu-edej-wva
>>
>>
>> This is an active step towards addressing the barriers that perpetuate
>> knowledge gaps on our projects and prevent participation in free knowledge.
>> We’re excited to try this new pilot and share our progress.
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Lisa Gruwell, Janeen Uzzell, Tony Sebro and the Equity Fund Committee
>>
>>
>> [1]
>> https://medium.com/freely-sharing-the-sum-of-all-knowledge/we-stand-for-racial-justice-49c31afbabca?source=collection_home---4------6-----------------------
>>
>>
>> [2]
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2020-December/096022.html
>>
>>
>> [3]
>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Community_Resources/Grants_Strategy_Relaunch_2020-2021
>>
>>
>> [4] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Equity_Fund
>>
>> [5] https://forms.gle/gzqRH7yMFEGgZb4e6
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Lisa Seitz Gruwell
>>
>> Chief Advancement Officer
>>
>> Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines
>> at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>> To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
>
>
>
> --
> *Nadee Gunasena*
> Executive Communications Manager
> Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines
> at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
[Wikimedia-l] Re: Sharing more details about the Equity Fund [ In reply to ]
Thank you to those who attended our Equity Fund Office Hours. We had a
small turnout with about three people attending the second session (evening
UTC) earlier today to speak with the Equity Fund Committee and learn more
about the fund. It was a constructive conversation and we learned of some
particular challenges in India that are barriers for participation in our
projects. We are adding the questions that were asked and the answers in
the Knowledge Equity Fund FAQ
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Equity_Fund/Frequently_asked_questions>.
Thank you to those who attended.

My 2 cents on some of the points in this thread:


1.

Definitely complete the form, Sam! Those projects seem very interesting
and definitely worthy of exploration for this. Thank you for sharing them.
2.

We want to be clear: This fund is insufficient to solve the problems
with Knowledge Inequity as it relates to race. We are aiming to make
progress and work with others who also advance this work.
3.

Knowledge Equity is a central part of the 2030 Strategic Direction and
our donors were included in the conversations that got us there. They very
much want equity to guide our work. Last year, Katherine and Janeen
published a very clear stand on racial justice
<https://medium.com/freely-sharing-the-sum-of-all-knowledge/we-stand-for-racial-justice-49c31afbabca>
that led to this fund. While we can’t mention every WMF program in the
space of a banner, we do include more information about WMF
programs in the donor
FAQ <https://donate.wikimedia.org/wiki/FAQ#What_is_Wikipedia?> which is
linked on every banner with more links to our plans, annual reports,
announcements and more detail regarding our programs. In terms of the
Knowledge Equity Fund, we announced it in the press release
<https://wikimediafoundation.org/news/2021/01/14/wikipedia-celebrates-20-years/>
that we posted for Wikipedia’s 20th birthday in January in seven
languages. It is also in our 2019-2020 fiscal year Audit Report
<https://wikimediafoundation.org/about/financial-reports/>. More
information on the Knowledge Equity Fund
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Equity_Fund> is now on meta.
We look forward to sharing more information about the Fund’s progress with
the community and donors alike later this summer.
4.

To clarify, this is not a $4.5 million grant to Tides Advocacy for their
programs around racial inequity. Instead, the Equity Fund Committee
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Equity_Fund#The_Equity_Fund_Committee>
sets the direction of the fund, identifies grantees and submits them to
Tides for review and administration. The Equity Fund Committee is
identifying grantees that fit in the five focus areas
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Equity_Fund#Areas_of_Funding>
to address racial inequity and free knowledge, and will benefit the
Wikimedia movement.


Thanks again for the questions and suggestions. We welcome any follow-up or
additional questions on the Talk page
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Knowledge_Equity_Fund&action=edit&redlink=1>
.

Best,

Lisa


On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 9:17 AM Andreas Kolbe <jayen466@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Lisa and all,
>
> Thanks for the info.
>
> Laudable though the goals of the Knowledge Equity Fund surely are, you
> seem to be saying that you gave $4.5 million – which readers presumably
> donated because they thought you were struggling to have enough money to
> keep Wikipedia up and running – to Tides Advocacy for the kind of
> "dismantling inequities" work that Tides Advocacy does anyway.[1]
>
> If donors had wanted to support Tides Advocacy's racial equity work,
> surely they could have donated to that organisation in the first place?
>
> Have you announced – or will you announce – this redirection of funds to
> the public, complete with an explanation of how this decision came about
> (i.e. as a result of last year's underspend, as described in your mail last
> December)?[2] At the time of writing, a Google search is unable to locate a
> related Wikimedia blog post or press release.
>
> Without such a public communication, donors will not even be aware that
> money they gave in response to banners asking for donations "to protect
> Wikipedia's independence" etc. is now going to be used for a different
> purpose altogether, one that is expressly outside of the scope of the
> conventional Wikimedia community grants that they might reasonably have
> expected their money to be used for.[3]
>
> Moreover, at some point, Wikipedia readers will no doubt be asked to
> donate another $4.5 million to meet expenses these funds could have covered
> (such as the most recent $5 million WMF donation to the endowment).
>
> Do you agree donors should be told?
>
> Best,
> Andreas
>
> [1] https://tidesadvocacy.org
> [2]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/XI5A4FKDJUK3VWOQWZIPIZXMWAMIX5IW/
> [3]
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Equity_Fund/Frequently_asked_questions#9._How_will_the_Equity_Fund_work_with_existing_grants_programmes
> ?
>
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 6:42 PM Nadee Gunasena <ngunasena@wikimedia.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> We realized we had shared the wrong date for the Equity Fund Office
>> Hours. Lisa's email initially said these would be Monday, June 13 - that
>> should be Monday, June 14. Sorry for any confusion - Updated times below.
>> You can also find these details and more information on Meta:
>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Equity_Fund
>>
>>
>> -
>>
>> Monday, June 14 at 0100-0200 UTC meet.google.com/myf-zcaw-ubg
>> -
>>
>> Monday, June 14 at 1500-1600 UTC meet.google.com/dzu-edej-wva
>>
>> ?
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 10:15 AM Lisa Gruwell <lgruwell@wikimedia.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> I’m excited to share more information about the Wikimedia Foundation’s
>>> Knowledge Equity Fund.
>>>
>>> The Equity Fund is a pilot initiative that came out of the commitment
>>> the Foundation’s leadership team made in June 2020 [1] in the wake of
>>> global protests against racial injustice. Our goal was to create a
>>> grant-making fund with an explicit focus on addressing barriers to free
>>> knowledge experienced by Black, indigenous and communities of color around
>>> the world.
>>>
>>> This is a $4.5 million USD fund to address racial inequities that impact
>>> the work of free knowledge. It was created to provide focused grants to
>>> organizations that are advancing knowledge equity, one of two key pillars
>>> of our 2030 strategic direction of becoming the essential infrastructure of
>>> free knowledge. Specifically, the fund is meant to support organizations
>>> working to address the racial injustices and barriers that prevent
>>> participation in free knowledge.
>>>
>>> We allocated funds for the Equity Fund at the end of the Foundation’s
>>> fiscal year last June. [2] It took more time than we expected to share our
>>> plans for this pilot program, as we’ve been navigating the operational
>>> and logistical issues of creating a new type of fund. Over the past
>>> several months since the Equity Fund was first announced, Foundation staff
>>> and volunteers have been meeting to discuss the goals and the details of
>>> the Equity Fund, and we finally have more to share.
>>>
>>> The Equity Fund will be used to support local and international
>>> organizations that don’t currently qualify for grants funding from the
>>> Foundation, such as external organizations that can help advance our
>>> mission and are not working directly on wikiprojects. We recognize that the
>>> work of knowledge equity is work that we as a movement cannot do alone. Our
>>> projects can only do so much when, for example, academic and mass media
>>> representation of marginalized communities remains insufficient, which in
>>> turn limits citations and primary sources for us to build from. Through
>>> Equity Fund investments, we wish to create an ecosystem of partners,
>>> collaborators, and grantees working on knowledge equity that will benefit
>>> the movement. This could include journalism projects to increase content
>>> about underrepresented regions of the world, or scholarship and research
>>> initiatives that are focused on expanding academic understanding of
>>> structural barriers to knowledge and potential solutions.
>>>
>>> The Equity Fund is separate from the grants that are available for
>>> community groups and the ongoing Grants Relaunch [3]. It is a new pool of
>>> funds that we can use to directly impact knowledge equity, and specifically
>>> barriers due to race that prevent access and participation in free
>>> knowledge.
>>>
>>> We are currently working to identify the first grant recipients for the
>>> Equity Fund. The Meta page for the Equity Fund [4] includes more
>>> information (the members of the Equity Fund Committee, the five specific
>>> focus areas we will be investing in) and next steps. We are also currently
>>> looking for recommendations on organizations for grants - you can visit
>>> Meta or fill out this survey [5] if you have organizations that are already
>>> doing this work and would be a good fit.
>>>
>>> Lastly, we do want to emphasize that this is a pilot. There are a lot of
>>> open questions that have been raised by community members that we are still
>>> figuring out, on topics such as ensuring investment in global organizations
>>> and inclusive definitions of racial equity. We welcome additional questions
>>> as the project evolves from this early stage. We’re answering questions on
>>> Meta, so please join us there. We will also be hosting Office Hours in the
>>> coming week:
>>>
>>> -
>>>
>>> Monday, June 13 at 0100-0200 UTC meet.google.com/myf-zcaw-ubg
>>> -
>>>
>>> Monday, June 13 at 1500-1600 UTC meet.google.com/dzu-edej-wva
>>>
>>>
>>> This is an active step towards addressing the barriers that perpetuate
>>> knowledge gaps on our projects and prevent participation in free knowledge.
>>> We’re excited to try this new pilot and share our progress.
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>>
>>> Lisa Gruwell, Janeen Uzzell, Tony Sebro and the Equity Fund Committee
>>>
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> https://medium.com/freely-sharing-the-sum-of-all-knowledge/we-stand-for-racial-justice-49c31afbabca?source=collection_home---4------6-----------------------
>>>
>>>
>>> [2]
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2020-December/096022.html
>>>
>>>
>>> [3]
>>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Community_Resources/Grants_Strategy_Relaunch_2020-2021
>>>
>>>
>>> [4] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Equity_Fund
>>>
>>> [5] https://forms.gle/gzqRH7yMFEGgZb4e6
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Lisa Seitz Gruwell
>>>
>>> Chief Advancement Officer
>>>
>>> Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines
>>> at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
>>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Nadee Gunasena*
>> Executive Communications Manager
>> Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines
>> at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>> To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines
> at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org



--

Lisa Seitz Gruwell

Chief Advancement Officer

Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
[Wikimedia-l] Re: Sharing more details about the Equity Fund [ In reply to ]
Thanks for those links, Lisa. I note that the January press release[1]
merely said,


*"In addition, the Foundation recently developed a $4.5 million Equity Fund
that will offer grants to advance more equitable, inclusive representation
in Wikimedia projects, including Wikipedia."*

This tells the reader very little. In particular, it does not make clear
that these are grants for recipients that would be ineligible for
Wikimedia's traditional community grants.

The 2019/2020 audit report[2] said, in the notes on page 14,

*During the year ended June 30, 2020, the Foundation provided an
unconditional grant to Tides Advocacy in the amount of of $8.723 million
for the Wikimedia Knowledge Equity Fund. This fund will be used to invest
in grant-making opportunities to increase the availability of free
knowledge and counteract structural inequalities to foster a just and
equitable representation of knowledge and people in the Wikimedia movement,
and to fund the annual operating expenses of other Wikimedia chapter
organizations in service of our mission of free knowledge. The Wikimedia
Knowledge Equity Fund is managed and controlled by Tides Advocacy. For the
year ended June 30, 2020, the amount funded is recorded in awards and
grants expense.*

Neither of these really provided enough detail to give the reader an
adequate sense of these plans, or explained how the funds will be disbursed.

$4.5 million is a substantial amount of money. It represents no less than
4% of total 2019/2020 expenses. In my view, this warrants more visible
communication than a single sentence buried in a 1,000-word blog post that
was about a different topic altogether, and an unpublicised page on Meta
that no one but an insider is likely to find.

Lastly, you say that every banner includes a link to the donor FAQ. When
the Latin American fundraising campaign was announced on Spanish Wikipedia,
Camille posted[3] the following to show the community what the banners
would look like:

Lo siento, envié URL obsoletas. Aquí están los actualizados. Desktop Large
<https://es.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Wikipedias&banner=B2021_0503_esLA_dsk_p1_lg_twin1&country=CL>
// Desktop Small
<https://es.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Wikipedias&banner=B2021_0503_esLA_dsk_p2_sm_twin1&country=CL>
// Mobile Large
<https://es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia?banner=B2021_0503_esLA_m_p1_lg_twin1&country=CL>
// Mobile Small
<https://es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia?banner=B2021_0503_esLA_m_p2_sm_twin1&country=CL>
--CDenes (WMF) <https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usuario:CDenes_(WMF)> (
discusión
<https://es.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Usuario_discusi%C3%B3n:CDenes_(WMF)&action=edit&redlink=1>)
19:30 30 abr 2021 (UTC)

Clicking on her links on my desktop, I find that only one of the four
banners (Desktop Large), as displayed on the Wikipedia page that comes up,
includes a link, in small print, to the FAQ ("Preguntas frecuentes"). None
of the others do. Can anyone else see such links on the pages that come up
when you click on Camille's links?

The recent Brazilian press screenshot available at
https://img.olhardigital.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Doacao-Wikipedia.jpg
lacks such a link as well, does it not? While it is in Portuguese rather
than Spanish, it matches the layout of what Camille posted precisely (with
the wording as adjusted following the recent community complaints at the
Portuguese Village Pump).[4]

As far as I can see, the user will only ever be shown a small FAQ link if
and after they initiate the payment process. At that point, their attention
is distracted, because they have to select a money amount or mode of
payment, email option etc. This seems designed to minimise the likelihood
that a user will actually go and read the FAQ.

Best,
Andreas

[1]
https://wikimediafoundation.org/news/2021/01/14/wikipedia-celebrates-20-years/
[2]
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/foundation/f/f7/Wikimedia_Foundation_FY2019-2020_Audit_Report.pdf
[3]
https://es.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Café/Archivo/Miscelánea/Actual&oldid=135491333#WMF_Fundraising_on_Spanish_Wiki_in_AR,_CL,_CO,_PE,_UY
[4]
https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipédia:Esplanada/geral/Banner_solicitando_doações_(20abr2021)

On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 1:56 AM Lisa Gruwell <lgruwell@wikimedia.org> wrote:

> Thank you to those who attended our Equity Fund Office Hours. We had a
> small turnout with about three people attending the second session (evening
> UTC) earlier today to speak with the Equity Fund Committee and learn more
> about the fund. It was a constructive conversation and we learned of some
> particular challenges in India that are barriers for participation in our
> projects. We are adding the questions that were asked and the answers in
> the Knowledge Equity Fund FAQ
> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Equity_Fund/Frequently_asked_questions>.
> Thank you to those who attended.
>
> My 2 cents on some of the points in this thread:
>
>
> 1.
>
> Definitely complete the form, Sam! Those projects seem very
> interesting and definitely worthy of exploration for this. Thank you for
> sharing them.
> 2.
>
> We want to be clear: This fund is insufficient to solve the problems
> with Knowledge Inequity as it relates to race. We are aiming to make
> progress and work with others who also advance this work.
> 3.
>
> Knowledge Equity is a central part of the 2030 Strategic Direction and
> our donors were included in the conversations that got us there. They very
> much want equity to guide our work. Last year, Katherine and Janeen
> published a very clear stand on racial justice
> <https://medium.com/freely-sharing-the-sum-of-all-knowledge/we-stand-for-racial-justice-49c31afbabca>
> that led to this fund. While we can’t mention every WMF program in the
> space of a banner, we do include more information about WMF programs in the donor
> FAQ <https://donate.wikimedia.org/wiki/FAQ#What_is_Wikipedia?> which
> is linked on every banner with more links to our plans, annual reports,
> announcements and more detail regarding our programs. In terms of the
> Knowledge Equity Fund, we announced it in the press release
> <https://wikimediafoundation.org/news/2021/01/14/wikipedia-celebrates-20-years/>
> that we posted for Wikipedia’s 20th birthday in January in seven
> languages. It is also in our 2019-2020 fiscal year Audit Report
> <https://wikimediafoundation.org/about/financial-reports/>. More
> information on the Knowledge Equity Fund
> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Equity_Fund> is now on
> meta. We look forward to sharing more information about the Fund’s
> progress with the community and donors alike later this summer.
> 4.
>
> To clarify, this is not a $4.5 million grant to Tides Advocacy for
> their programs around racial inequity. Instead, the Equity Fund
> Committee
> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Equity_Fund#The_Equity_Fund_Committee>
> sets the direction of the fund, identifies grantees and submits them to
> Tides for review and administration. The Equity Fund Committee is
> identifying grantees that fit in the five focus areas
> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Equity_Fund#Areas_of_Funding>
> to address racial inequity and free knowledge, and will benefit the
> Wikimedia movement.
>
>
> Thanks again for the questions and suggestions. We welcome any follow-up
> or additional questions on the Talk page
> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Knowledge_Equity_Fund&action=edit&redlink=1>
> .
>
> Best,
>
> Lisa
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 9:17 AM Andreas Kolbe <jayen466@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Lisa and all,
>>
>> Thanks for the info.
>>
>> Laudable though the goals of the Knowledge Equity Fund surely are, you
>> seem to be saying that you gave $4.5 million – which readers presumably
>> donated because they thought you were struggling to have enough money to
>> keep Wikipedia up and running – to Tides Advocacy for the kind of
>> "dismantling inequities" work that Tides Advocacy does anyway.[1]
>>
>> If donors had wanted to support Tides Advocacy's racial equity work,
>> surely they could have donated to that organisation in the first place?
>>
>> Have you announced – or will you announce – this redirection of funds to
>> the public, complete with an explanation of how this decision came about
>> (i.e. as a result of last year's underspend, as described in your mail last
>> December)?[2] At the time of writing, a Google search is unable to locate a
>> related Wikimedia blog post or press release.
>>
>> Without such a public communication, donors will not even be aware that
>> money they gave in response to banners asking for donations "to protect
>> Wikipedia's independence" etc. is now going to be used for a different
>> purpose altogether, one that is expressly outside of the scope of the
>> conventional Wikimedia community grants that they might reasonably have
>> expected their money to be used for.[3]
>>
>> Moreover, at some point, Wikipedia readers will no doubt be asked to
>> donate another $4.5 million to meet expenses these funds could have covered
>> (such as the most recent $5 million WMF donation to the endowment).
>>
>> Do you agree donors should be told?
>>
>> Best,
>> Andreas
>>
>> [1] https://tidesadvocacy.org
>> [2]
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/XI5A4FKDJUK3VWOQWZIPIZXMWAMIX5IW/
>> [3]
>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Equity_Fund/Frequently_asked_questions#9._How_will_the_Equity_Fund_work_with_existing_grants_programmes
>> ?
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 6:42 PM Nadee Gunasena <ngunasena@wikimedia.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> We realized we had shared the wrong date for the Equity Fund Office
>>> Hours. Lisa's email initially said these would be Monday, June 13 - that
>>> should be Monday, June 14. Sorry for any confusion - Updated times below.
>>> You can also find these details and more information on Meta:
>>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Equity_Fund
>>>
>>>
>>> -
>>>
>>> Monday, June 14 at 0100-0200 UTC meet.google.com/myf-zcaw-ubg
>>> -
>>>
>>> Monday, June 14 at 1500-1600 UTC meet.google.com/dzu-edej-wva
>>>
>>> ?
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 10:15 AM Lisa Gruwell <lgruwell@wikimedia.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>
>>>> I’m excited to share more information about the Wikimedia Foundation’s
>>>> Knowledge Equity Fund.
>>>>
>>>> The Equity Fund is a pilot initiative that came out of the commitment
>>>> the Foundation’s leadership team made in June 2020 [1] in the wake of
>>>> global protests against racial injustice. Our goal was to create a
>>>> grant-making fund with an explicit focus on addressing barriers to free
>>>> knowledge experienced by Black, indigenous and communities of color around
>>>> the world.
>>>>
>>>> This is a $4.5 million USD fund to address racial inequities that
>>>> impact the work of free knowledge. It was created to provide focused grants
>>>> to organizations that are advancing knowledge equity, one of two key
>>>> pillars of our 2030 strategic direction of becoming the essential
>>>> infrastructure of free knowledge. Specifically, the fund is meant to
>>>> support organizations working to address the racial injustices and barriers
>>>> that prevent participation in free knowledge.
>>>>
>>>> We allocated funds for the Equity Fund at the end of the Foundation’s
>>>> fiscal year last June. [2] It took more time than we expected to share our
>>>> plans for this pilot program, as we’ve been navigating the operational
>>>> and logistical issues of creating a new type of fund. Over the past
>>>> several months since the Equity Fund was first announced, Foundation staff
>>>> and volunteers have been meeting to discuss the goals and the details of
>>>> the Equity Fund, and we finally have more to share.
>>>>
>>>> The Equity Fund will be used to support local and international
>>>> organizations that don’t currently qualify for grants funding from the
>>>> Foundation, such as external organizations that can help advance our
>>>> mission and are not working directly on wikiprojects. We recognize that the
>>>> work of knowledge equity is work that we as a movement cannot do alone. Our
>>>> projects can only do so much when, for example, academic and mass media
>>>> representation of marginalized communities remains insufficient, which in
>>>> turn limits citations and primary sources for us to build from. Through
>>>> Equity Fund investments, we wish to create an ecosystem of partners,
>>>> collaborators, and grantees working on knowledge equity that will benefit
>>>> the movement. This could include journalism projects to increase content
>>>> about underrepresented regions of the world, or scholarship and research
>>>> initiatives that are focused on expanding academic understanding of
>>>> structural barriers to knowledge and potential solutions.
>>>>
>>>> The Equity Fund is separate from the grants that are available for
>>>> community groups and the ongoing Grants Relaunch [3]. It is a new pool of
>>>> funds that we can use to directly impact knowledge equity, and specifically
>>>> barriers due to race that prevent access and participation in free
>>>> knowledge.
>>>>
>>>> We are currently working to identify the first grant recipients for the
>>>> Equity Fund. The Meta page for the Equity Fund [4] includes more
>>>> information (the members of the Equity Fund Committee, the five specific
>>>> focus areas we will be investing in) and next steps. We are also currently
>>>> looking for recommendations on organizations for grants - you can visit
>>>> Meta or fill out this survey [5] if you have organizations that are already
>>>> doing this work and would be a good fit.
>>>>
>>>> Lastly, we do want to emphasize that this is a pilot. There are a lot
>>>> of open questions that have been raised by community members that we are
>>>> still figuring out, on topics such as ensuring investment in global
>>>> organizations and inclusive definitions of racial equity. We welcome
>>>> additional questions as the project evolves from this early stage. We’re
>>>> answering questions on Meta, so please join us there. We will also be
>>>> hosting Office Hours in the coming week:
>>>>
>>>> -
>>>>
>>>> Monday, June 13 at 0100-0200 UTC meet.google.com/myf-zcaw-ubg
>>>> -
>>>>
>>>> Monday, June 13 at 1500-1600 UTC meet.google.com/dzu-edej-wva
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This is an active step towards addressing the barriers that perpetuate
>>>> knowledge gaps on our projects and prevent participation in free knowledge.
>>>> We’re excited to try this new pilot and share our progress.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you,
>>>>
>>>> Lisa Gruwell, Janeen Uzzell, Tony Sebro and the Equity Fund Committee
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [1]
>>>> https://medium.com/freely-sharing-the-sum-of-all-knowledge/we-stand-for-racial-justice-49c31afbabca?source=collection_home---4------6-----------------------
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [2]
>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2020-December/096022.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [3]
>>>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Community_Resources/Grants_Strategy_Relaunch_2020-2021
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [4] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Equity_Fund
>>>>
>>>> [5] https://forms.gle/gzqRH7yMFEGgZb4e6
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Lisa Seitz Gruwell
>>>>
>>>> Chief Advancement Officer
>>>>
>>>> Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org,
>>>> guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
>>>> and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Nadee Gunasena*
>>> Executive Communications Manager
>>> Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines
>>> at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
>>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines
>> at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>> To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
>
>
>
> --
>
> Lisa Seitz Gruwell
>
> Chief Advancement Officer
>
> Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines
> at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
[Wikimedia-l] Re: Sharing more details about the Equity Fund [ In reply to ]
The links to the donor FAQ are there. The smaller banners expand when you
click on a payment method.

On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 3:06 AM Andreas Kolbe <jayen466@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks for those links, Lisa. I note that the January press release[1]
> merely said,
>
>
> *"In addition, the Foundation recently developed a $4.5 million Equity
> Fund that will offer grants to advance more equitable, inclusive
> representation in Wikimedia projects, including Wikipedia."*
>
> This tells the reader very little. In particular, it does not make clear
> that these are grants for recipients that would be ineligible for
> Wikimedia's traditional community grants.
>
> The 2019/2020 audit report[2] said, in the notes on page 14,
>
> *During the year ended June 30, 2020, the Foundation provided an
> unconditional grant to Tides Advocacy in the amount of of $8.723 million
> for the Wikimedia Knowledge Equity Fund. This fund will be used to invest
> in grant-making opportunities to increase the availability of free
> knowledge and counteract structural inequalities to foster a just and
> equitable representation of knowledge and people in the Wikimedia movement,
> and to fund the annual operating expenses of other Wikimedia chapter
> organizations in service of our mission of free knowledge. The Wikimedia
> Knowledge Equity Fund is managed and controlled by Tides Advocacy. For the
> year ended June 30, 2020, the amount funded is recorded in awards and
> grants expense.*
>
> Neither of these really provided enough detail to give the reader an
> adequate sense of these plans, or explained how the funds will be disbursed.
>
> $4.5 million is a substantial amount of money. It represents no less than
> 4% of total 2019/2020 expenses. In my view, this warrants more visible
> communication than a single sentence buried in a 1,000-word blog post that
> was about a different topic altogether, and an unpublicised page on Meta
> that no one but an insider is likely to find.
>
> Lastly, you say that every banner includes a link to the donor FAQ. When
> the Latin American fundraising campaign was announced on Spanish Wikipedia,
> Camille posted[3] the following to show the community what the banners
> would look like:
>
> Lo siento, envié URL obsoletas. Aquí están los actualizados. Desktop Large
> <https://es.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Wikipedias&banner=B2021_0503_esLA_dsk_p1_lg_twin1&country=CL>
> // Desktop Small
> <https://es.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Wikipedias&banner=B2021_0503_esLA_dsk_p2_sm_twin1&country=CL>
> // Mobile Large
> <https://es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia?banner=B2021_0503_esLA_m_p1_lg_twin1&country=CL>
> // Mobile Small
> <https://es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia?banner=B2021_0503_esLA_m_p2_sm_twin1&country=CL>
> --CDenes (WMF) <https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usuario:CDenes_(WMF)> (
> discusión
> <https://es.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Usuario_discusi%C3%B3n:CDenes_(WMF)&action=edit&redlink=1>)
> 19:30 30 abr 2021 (UTC)
>
> Clicking on her links on my desktop, I find that only one of the four
> banners (Desktop Large), as displayed on the Wikipedia page that comes up,
> includes a link, in small print, to the FAQ ("Preguntas frecuentes"). None
> of the others do. Can anyone else see such links on the pages that come up
> when you click on Camille's links?
>
> The recent Brazilian press screenshot available at
> https://img.olhardigital.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Doacao-Wikipedia.jpg
> lacks such a link as well, does it not? While it is in Portuguese rather
> than Spanish, it matches the layout of what Camille posted precisely (with
> the wording as adjusted following the recent community complaints at the
> Portuguese Village Pump).[4]
>
> As far as I can see, the user will only ever be shown a small FAQ link if
> and after they initiate the payment process. At that point, their attention
> is distracted, because they have to select a money amount or mode of
> payment, email option etc. This seems designed to minimise the likelihood
> that a user will actually go and read the FAQ.
>
> Best,
> Andreas
>
> [1]
> https://wikimediafoundation.org/news/2021/01/14/wikipedia-celebrates-20-years/
> [2]
> https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/foundation/f/f7/Wikimedia_Foundation_FY2019-2020_Audit_Report.pdf
> [3]
> https://es.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Café/Archivo/Miscelánea/Actual&oldid=135491333#WMF_Fundraising_on_Spanish_Wiki_in_AR,_CL,_CO,_PE,_UY
> [4]
> https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipédia:Esplanada/geral/Banner_solicitando_doações_(20abr2021)
>
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 1:56 AM Lisa Gruwell <lgruwell@wikimedia.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Thank you to those who attended our Equity Fund Office Hours. We had a
>> small turnout with about three people attending the second session (evening
>> UTC) earlier today to speak with the Equity Fund Committee and learn more
>> about the fund. It was a constructive conversation and we learned of some
>> particular challenges in India that are barriers for participation in our
>> projects. We are adding the questions that were asked and the answers in
>> the Knowledge Equity Fund FAQ
>> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Equity_Fund/Frequently_asked_questions>.
>> Thank you to those who attended.
>>
>> My 2 cents on some of the points in this thread:
>>
>>
>> 1.
>>
>> Definitely complete the form, Sam! Those projects seem very
>> interesting and definitely worthy of exploration for this. Thank you for
>> sharing them.
>> 2.
>>
>> We want to be clear: This fund is insufficient to solve the problems
>> with Knowledge Inequity as it relates to race. We are aiming to make
>> progress and work with others who also advance this work.
>> 3.
>>
>> Knowledge Equity is a central part of the 2030 Strategic Direction
>> and our donors were included in the conversations that got us there. They
>> very much want equity to guide our work. Last year, Katherine and Janeen
>> published a very clear stand on racial justice
>> <https://medium.com/freely-sharing-the-sum-of-all-knowledge/we-stand-for-racial-justice-49c31afbabca>
>> that led to this fund. While we can’t mention every WMF program in the
>> space of a banner, we do include more information about WMF programs in the donor
>> FAQ <https://donate.wikimedia.org/wiki/FAQ#What_is_Wikipedia?> which
>> is linked on every banner with more links to our plans, annual reports,
>> announcements and more detail regarding our programs. In terms of the
>> Knowledge Equity Fund, we announced it in the press release
>> <https://wikimediafoundation.org/news/2021/01/14/wikipedia-celebrates-20-years/>
>> that we posted for Wikipedia’s 20th birthday in January in seven
>> languages. It is also in our 2019-2020 fiscal year Audit Report
>> <https://wikimediafoundation.org/about/financial-reports/>. More
>> information on the Knowledge Equity Fund
>> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Equity_Fund> is now on
>> meta. We look forward to sharing more information about the Fund’s
>> progress with the community and donors alike later this summer.
>> 4.
>>
>> To clarify, this is not a $4.5 million grant to Tides Advocacy for
>> their programs around racial inequity. Instead, the Equity Fund
>> Committee
>> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Equity_Fund#The_Equity_Fund_Committee>
>> sets the direction of the fund, identifies grantees and submits them to
>> Tides for review and administration. The Equity Fund Committee is
>> identifying grantees that fit in the five focus areas
>> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Equity_Fund#Areas_of_Funding>
>> to address racial inequity and free knowledge, and will benefit the
>> Wikimedia movement.
>>
>>
>> Thanks again for the questions and suggestions. We welcome any follow-up
>> or additional questions on the Talk page
>> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Knowledge_Equity_Fund&action=edit&redlink=1>
>> .
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Lisa
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 9:17 AM Andreas Kolbe <jayen466@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Lisa and all,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the info.
>>>
>>> Laudable though the goals of the Knowledge Equity Fund surely are, you
>>> seem to be saying that you gave $4.5 million – which readers presumably
>>> donated because they thought you were struggling to have enough money to
>>> keep Wikipedia up and running – to Tides Advocacy for the kind of
>>> "dismantling inequities" work that Tides Advocacy does anyway.[1]
>>>
>>> If donors had wanted to support Tides Advocacy's racial equity work,
>>> surely they could have donated to that organisation in the first place?
>>>
>>> Have you announced – or will you announce – this redirection of funds to
>>> the public, complete with an explanation of how this decision came about
>>> (i.e. as a result of last year's underspend, as described in your mail last
>>> December)?[2] At the time of writing, a Google search is unable to locate a
>>> related Wikimedia blog post or press release.
>>>
>>> Without such a public communication, donors will not even be aware that
>>> money they gave in response to banners asking for donations "to protect
>>> Wikipedia's independence" etc. is now going to be used for a different
>>> purpose altogether, one that is expressly outside of the scope of the
>>> conventional Wikimedia community grants that they might reasonably have
>>> expected their money to be used for.[3]
>>>
>>> Moreover, at some point, Wikipedia readers will no doubt be asked to
>>> donate another $4.5 million to meet expenses these funds could have covered
>>> (such as the most recent $5 million WMF donation to the endowment).
>>>
>>> Do you agree donors should be told?
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Andreas
>>>
>>> [1] https://tidesadvocacy.org
>>> [2]
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/XI5A4FKDJUK3VWOQWZIPIZXMWAMIX5IW/
>>> [3]
>>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Equity_Fund/Frequently_asked_questions#9._How_will_the_Equity_Fund_work_with_existing_grants_programmes
>>> ?
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 6:42 PM Nadee Gunasena <ngunasena@wikimedia.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> We realized we had shared the wrong date for the Equity Fund Office
>>>> Hours. Lisa's email initially said these would be Monday, June 13 - that
>>>> should be Monday, June 14. Sorry for any confusion - Updated times below.
>>>> You can also find these details and more information on Meta:
>>>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Equity_Fund
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -
>>>>
>>>> Monday, June 14 at 0100-0200 UTC meet.google.com/myf-zcaw-ubg
>>>> -
>>>>
>>>> Monday, June 14 at 1500-1600 UTC meet.google.com/dzu-edej-wva
>>>>
>>>> ?
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 10:15 AM Lisa Gruwell <lgruwell@wikimedia.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>
>>>>> I’m excited to share more information about the Wikimedia Foundation’s
>>>>> Knowledge Equity Fund.
>>>>>
>>>>> The Equity Fund is a pilot initiative that came out of the commitment
>>>>> the Foundation’s leadership team made in June 2020 [1] in the wake of
>>>>> global protests against racial injustice. Our goal was to create a
>>>>> grant-making fund with an explicit focus on addressing barriers to free
>>>>> knowledge experienced by Black, indigenous and communities of color around
>>>>> the world.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is a $4.5 million USD fund to address racial inequities that
>>>>> impact the work of free knowledge. It was created to provide focused grants
>>>>> to organizations that are advancing knowledge equity, one of two key
>>>>> pillars of our 2030 strategic direction of becoming the essential
>>>>> infrastructure of free knowledge. Specifically, the fund is meant to
>>>>> support organizations working to address the racial injustices and barriers
>>>>> that prevent participation in free knowledge.
>>>>>
>>>>> We allocated funds for the Equity Fund at the end of the Foundation’s
>>>>> fiscal year last June. [2] It took more time than we expected to share our
>>>>> plans for this pilot program, as we’ve been navigating the
>>>>> operational and logistical issues of creating a new type of fund.
>>>>> Over the past several months since the Equity Fund was first announced,
>>>>> Foundation staff and volunteers have been meeting to discuss the goals and
>>>>> the details of the Equity Fund, and we finally have more to share.
>>>>>
>>>>> The Equity Fund will be used to support local and international
>>>>> organizations that don’t currently qualify for grants funding from the
>>>>> Foundation, such as external organizations that can help advance our
>>>>> mission and are not working directly on wikiprojects. We recognize that the
>>>>> work of knowledge equity is work that we as a movement cannot do alone. Our
>>>>> projects can only do so much when, for example, academic and mass media
>>>>> representation of marginalized communities remains insufficient, which in
>>>>> turn limits citations and primary sources for us to build from. Through
>>>>> Equity Fund investments, we wish to create an ecosystem of partners,
>>>>> collaborators, and grantees working on knowledge equity that will benefit
>>>>> the movement. This could include journalism projects to increase content
>>>>> about underrepresented regions of the world, or scholarship and research
>>>>> initiatives that are focused on expanding academic understanding of
>>>>> structural barriers to knowledge and potential solutions.
>>>>>
>>>>> The Equity Fund is separate from the grants that are available for
>>>>> community groups and the ongoing Grants Relaunch [3]. It is a new pool of
>>>>> funds that we can use to directly impact knowledge equity, and specifically
>>>>> barriers due to race that prevent access and participation in free
>>>>> knowledge.
>>>>>
>>>>> We are currently working to identify the first grant recipients for
>>>>> the Equity Fund. The Meta page for the Equity Fund [4] includes more
>>>>> information (the members of the Equity Fund Committee, the five specific
>>>>> focus areas we will be investing in) and next steps. We are also currently
>>>>> looking for recommendations on organizations for grants - you can visit
>>>>> Meta or fill out this survey [5] if you have organizations that are already
>>>>> doing this work and would be a good fit.
>>>>>
>>>>> Lastly, we do want to emphasize that this is a pilot. There are a lot
>>>>> of open questions that have been raised by community members that we are
>>>>> still figuring out, on topics such as ensuring investment in global
>>>>> organizations and inclusive definitions of racial equity. We welcome
>>>>> additional questions as the project evolves from this early stage. We’re
>>>>> answering questions on Meta, so please join us there. We will also be
>>>>> hosting Office Hours in the coming week:
>>>>>
>>>>> -
>>>>>
>>>>> Monday, June 13 at 0100-0200 UTC meet.google.com/myf-zcaw-ubg
>>>>> -
>>>>>
>>>>> Monday, June 13 at 1500-1600 UTC meet.google.com/dzu-edej-wva
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This is an active step towards addressing the barriers that perpetuate
>>>>> knowledge gaps on our projects and prevent participation in free knowledge.
>>>>> We’re excited to try this new pilot and share our progress.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>
>>>>> Lisa Gruwell, Janeen Uzzell, Tony Sebro and the Equity Fund Committee
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [1]
>>>>> https://medium.com/freely-sharing-the-sum-of-all-knowledge/we-stand-for-racial-justice-49c31afbabca?source=collection_home---4------6-----------------------
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [2]
>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2020-December/096022.html
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [3]
>>>>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Community_Resources/Grants_Strategy_Relaunch_2020-2021
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [4] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Equity_Fund
>>>>>
>>>>> [5] https://forms.gle/gzqRH7yMFEGgZb4e6
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> Lisa Seitz Gruwell
>>>>>
>>>>> Chief Advancement Officer
>>>>>
>>>>> Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org,
>>>>> guidelines at:
>>>>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
>>>>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> *Nadee Gunasena*
>>>> Executive Communications Manager
>>>> Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org,
>>>> guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
>>>> and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines
>>> at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
>>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Lisa Seitz Gruwell
>>
>> Chief Advancement Officer
>>
>> Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines
>> at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>> To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines
> at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org



--

Lisa Seitz Gruwell

Chief Advancement Officer

Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
[Wikimedia-l] Re: Sharing more details about the Equity Fund [ In reply to ]
Hi Lisa and all,

On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 3:13 PM Lisa Gruwell <lgruwell@wikimedia.org> wrote:

> The links to the donor FAQ are there. The smaller banners expand when you
> click on a payment method.
>

You'll find that this information was already contained in the post you
replied to.

The point remains though: now that it exists, the knowledge equity fund
needs publicity. At $4.5M, it is about half as much again as all the grants
and awards disbursed to movement members in the 2019/2020 FY combined
(which came to $9.2M, by my calculation: $22.9M total – $5M endowment –
$8.7M Tides Advocacy). Relative to your overall annual grantmaking, this is
a very substantial amount of money that is now available to non-affiliates
working on racial equity issues.

Moving forward, given that the decision has been made, how will racial
equity organisations learn about the availability of this money? You are
soliciting recommendations from Wikimedians on Meta, but surely you can't
just rely on those and your own networks? I mentioned a blog post – to date
there has not even been a tweet from the WMF about this. How about an
article in The Root[1] or a similar publication?

Andreas

[1] https://www.theroot.com




>
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 3:06 AM Andreas Kolbe <jayen466@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for those links, Lisa. I note that the January press release[1]
>> merely said,
>>
>>
>> *"In addition, the Foundation recently developed a $4.5 million Equity
>> Fund that will offer grants to advance more equitable, inclusive
>> representation in Wikimedia projects, including Wikipedia."*
>>
>> This tells the reader very little. In particular, it does not make clear
>> that these are grants for recipients that would be ineligible for
>> Wikimedia's traditional community grants.
>>
>> The 2019/2020 audit report[2] said, in the notes on page 14,
>>
>> *During the year ended June 30, 2020, the Foundation provided an
>> unconditional grant to Tides Advocacy in the amount of of $8.723 million
>> for the Wikimedia Knowledge Equity Fund. This fund will be used to invest
>> in grant-making opportunities to increase the availability of free
>> knowledge and counteract structural inequalities to foster a just and
>> equitable representation of knowledge and people in the Wikimedia movement,
>> and to fund the annual operating expenses of other Wikimedia chapter
>> organizations in service of our mission of free knowledge. The Wikimedia
>> Knowledge Equity Fund is managed and controlled by Tides Advocacy. For the
>> year ended June 30, 2020, the amount funded is recorded in awards and
>> grants expense.*
>>
>> Neither of these really provided enough detail to give the reader an
>> adequate sense of these plans, or explained how the funds will be disbursed.
>>
>> $4.5 million is a substantial amount of money. It represents no less than
>> 4% of total 2019/2020 expenses. In my view, this warrants more visible
>> communication than a single sentence buried in a 1,000-word blog post that
>> was about a different topic altogether, and an unpublicised page on Meta
>> that no one but an insider is likely to find.
>>
>> Lastly, you say that every banner includes a link to the donor FAQ. When
>> the Latin American fundraising campaign was announced on Spanish Wikipedia,
>> Camille posted[3] the following to show the community what the banners
>> would look like:
>>
>> Lo siento, envié URL obsoletas. Aquí están los actualizados. Desktop
>> Large
>> <https://es.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Wikipedias&banner=B2021_0503_esLA_dsk_p1_lg_twin1&country=CL>
>> // Desktop Small
>> <https://es.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Wikipedias&banner=B2021_0503_esLA_dsk_p2_sm_twin1&country=CL>
>> // Mobile Large
>> <https://es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia?banner=B2021_0503_esLA_m_p1_lg_twin1&country=CL>
>> // Mobile Small
>> <https://es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia?banner=B2021_0503_esLA_m_p2_sm_twin1&country=CL>
>> --CDenes (WMF) <https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usuario:CDenes_(WMF)> (
>> discusión
>> <https://es.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Usuario_discusi%C3%B3n:CDenes_(WMF)&action=edit&redlink=1>)
>> 19:30 30 abr 2021 (UTC)
>>
>> Clicking on her links on my desktop, I find that only one of the four
>> banners (Desktop Large), as displayed on the Wikipedia page that comes up,
>> includes a link, in small print, to the FAQ ("Preguntas frecuentes"). None
>> of the others do. Can anyone else see such links on the pages that come up
>> when you click on Camille's links?
>>
>> The recent Brazilian press screenshot available at
>> https://img.olhardigital.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Doacao-Wikipedia.jpg
>> lacks such a link as well, does it not? While it is in Portuguese rather
>> than Spanish, it matches the layout of what Camille posted precisely (with
>> the wording as adjusted following the recent community complaints at the
>> Portuguese Village Pump).[4]
>>
>> As far as I can see, the user will only ever be shown a small FAQ link if
>> and after they initiate the payment process. At that point, their attention
>> is distracted, because they have to select a money amount or mode of
>> payment, email option etc. This seems designed to minimise the likelihood
>> that a user will actually go and read the FAQ.
>>
>> Best,
>> Andreas
>>
>> [1]
>> https://wikimediafoundation.org/news/2021/01/14/wikipedia-celebrates-20-years/
>> [2]
>> https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/foundation/f/f7/Wikimedia_Foundation_FY2019-2020_Audit_Report.pdf
>> [3]
>> https://es.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Café/Archivo/Miscelánea/Actual&oldid=135491333#WMF_Fundraising_on_Spanish_Wiki_in_AR,_CL,_CO,_PE,_UY
>> [4]
>> https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipédia:Esplanada/geral/Banner_solicitando_doações_(20abr2021)
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 1:56 AM Lisa Gruwell <lgruwell@wikimedia.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thank you to those who attended our Equity Fund Office Hours. We had a
>>> small turnout with about three people attending the second session (evening
>>> UTC) earlier today to speak with the Equity Fund Committee and learn more
>>> about the fund. It was a constructive conversation and we learned of some
>>> particular challenges in India that are barriers for participation in our
>>> projects. We are adding the questions that were asked and the answers in
>>> the Knowledge Equity Fund FAQ
>>> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Equity_Fund/Frequently_asked_questions>.
>>> Thank you to those who attended.
>>>
>>> My 2 cents on some of the points in this thread:
>>>
>>>
>>> 1.
>>>
>>> Definitely complete the form, Sam! Those projects seem very
>>> interesting and definitely worthy of exploration for this. Thank you for
>>> sharing them.
>>> 2.
>>>
>>> We want to be clear: This fund is insufficient to solve the
>>> problems with Knowledge Inequity as it relates to race. We are aiming to
>>> make progress and work with others who also advance this work.
>>> 3.
>>>
>>> Knowledge Equity is a central part of the 2030 Strategic Direction
>>> and our donors were included in the conversations that got us there. They
>>> very much want equity to guide our work. Last year, Katherine and Janeen
>>> published a very clear stand on racial justice
>>> <https://medium.com/freely-sharing-the-sum-of-all-knowledge/we-stand-for-racial-justice-49c31afbabca>
>>> that led to this fund. While we can’t mention every WMF program in the
>>> space of a banner, we do include more information about WMF programs in the donor
>>> FAQ <https://donate.wikimedia.org/wiki/FAQ#What_is_Wikipedia?> which
>>> is linked on every banner with more links to our plans, annual reports,
>>> announcements and more detail regarding our programs. In terms of the
>>> Knowledge Equity Fund, we announced it in the press release
>>> <https://wikimediafoundation.org/news/2021/01/14/wikipedia-celebrates-20-years/>
>>> that we posted for Wikipedia’s 20th birthday in January in seven
>>> languages. It is also in our 2019-2020 fiscal year Audit Report
>>> <https://wikimediafoundation.org/about/financial-reports/>. More
>>> information on the Knowledge Equity Fund
>>> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Equity_Fund> is now on
>>> meta. We look forward to sharing more information about the Fund’s
>>> progress with the community and donors alike later this summer.
>>> 4.
>>>
>>> To clarify, this is not a $4.5 million grant to Tides Advocacy for
>>> their programs around racial inequity. Instead, the Equity Fund
>>> Committee
>>> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Equity_Fund#The_Equity_Fund_Committee>
>>> sets the direction of the fund, identifies grantees and submits them to
>>> Tides for review and administration. The Equity Fund Committee is
>>> identifying grantees that fit in the five focus areas
>>> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Equity_Fund#Areas_of_Funding>
>>> to address racial inequity and free knowledge, and will benefit the
>>> Wikimedia movement.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks again for the questions and suggestions. We welcome any follow-up
>>> or additional questions on the Talk page
>>> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Knowledge_Equity_Fund&action=edit&redlink=1>
>>> .
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Lisa
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 9:17 AM Andreas Kolbe <jayen466@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Lisa and all,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the info.
>>>>
>>>> Laudable though the goals of the Knowledge Equity Fund surely are, you
>>>> seem to be saying that you gave $4.5 million – which readers presumably
>>>> donated because they thought you were struggling to have enough money to
>>>> keep Wikipedia up and running – to Tides Advocacy for the kind of
>>>> "dismantling inequities" work that Tides Advocacy does anyway.[1]
>>>>
>>>> If donors had wanted to support Tides Advocacy's racial equity work,
>>>> surely they could have donated to that organisation in the first place?
>>>>
>>>> Have you announced – or will you announce – this redirection of funds
>>>> to the public, complete with an explanation of how this decision came about
>>>> (i.e. as a result of last year's underspend, as described in your mail last
>>>> December)?[2] At the time of writing, a Google search is unable to locate a
>>>> related Wikimedia blog post or press release.
>>>>
>>>> Without such a public communication, donors will not even be aware that
>>>> money they gave in response to banners asking for donations "to protect
>>>> Wikipedia's independence" etc. is now going to be used for a different
>>>> purpose altogether, one that is expressly outside of the scope of the
>>>> conventional Wikimedia community grants that they might reasonably have
>>>> expected their money to be used for.[3]
>>>>
>>>> Moreover, at some point, Wikipedia readers will no doubt be asked to
>>>> donate another $4.5 million to meet expenses these funds could have covered
>>>> (such as the most recent $5 million WMF donation to the endowment).
>>>>
>>>> Do you agree donors should be told?
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Andreas
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://tidesadvocacy.org
>>>> [2]
>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/XI5A4FKDJUK3VWOQWZIPIZXMWAMIX5IW/
>>>> [3]
>>>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Equity_Fund/Frequently_asked_questions#9._How_will_the_Equity_Fund_work_with_existing_grants_programmes
>>>> ?
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 6:42 PM Nadee Gunasena <ngunasena@wikimedia.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> We realized we had shared the wrong date for the Equity Fund Office
>>>>> Hours. Lisa's email initially said these would be Monday, June 13 - that
>>>>> should be Monday, June 14. Sorry for any confusion - Updated times below.
>>>>> You can also find these details and more information on Meta:
>>>>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Equity_Fund
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -
>>>>>
>>>>> Monday, June 14 at 0100-0200 UTC meet.google.com/myf-zcaw-ubg
>>>>> -
>>>>>
>>>>> Monday, June 14 at 1500-1600 UTC meet.google.com/dzu-edej-wva
>>>>>
>>>>> ?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 10:15 AM Lisa Gruwell <lgruwell@wikimedia.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I’m excited to share more information about the Wikimedia
>>>>>> Foundation’s Knowledge Equity Fund.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The Equity Fund is a pilot initiative that came out of the commitment
>>>>>> the Foundation’s leadership team made in June 2020 [1] in the wake of
>>>>>> global protests against racial injustice. Our goal was to create a
>>>>>> grant-making fund with an explicit focus on addressing barriers to free
>>>>>> knowledge experienced by Black, indigenous and communities of color around
>>>>>> the world.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is a $4.5 million USD fund to address racial inequities that
>>>>>> impact the work of free knowledge. It was created to provide focused grants
>>>>>> to organizations that are advancing knowledge equity, one of two key
>>>>>> pillars of our 2030 strategic direction of becoming the essential
>>>>>> infrastructure of free knowledge. Specifically, the fund is meant to
>>>>>> support organizations working to address the racial injustices and barriers
>>>>>> that prevent participation in free knowledge.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We allocated funds for the Equity Fund at the end of the Foundation’s
>>>>>> fiscal year last June. [2] It took more time than we expected to share our
>>>>>> plans for this pilot program, as we’ve been navigating the
>>>>>> operational and logistical issues of creating a new type of fund.
>>>>>> Over the past several months since the Equity Fund was first announced,
>>>>>> Foundation staff and volunteers have been meeting to discuss the goals and
>>>>>> the details of the Equity Fund, and we finally have more to share.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The Equity Fund will be used to support local and international
>>>>>> organizations that don’t currently qualify for grants funding from the
>>>>>> Foundation, such as external organizations that can help advance our
>>>>>> mission and are not working directly on wikiprojects. We recognize that the
>>>>>> work of knowledge equity is work that we as a movement cannot do alone. Our
>>>>>> projects can only do so much when, for example, academic and mass media
>>>>>> representation of marginalized communities remains insufficient, which in
>>>>>> turn limits citations and primary sources for us to build from. Through
>>>>>> Equity Fund investments, we wish to create an ecosystem of partners,
>>>>>> collaborators, and grantees working on knowledge equity that will benefit
>>>>>> the movement. This could include journalism projects to increase content
>>>>>> about underrepresented regions of the world, or scholarship and research
>>>>>> initiatives that are focused on expanding academic understanding of
>>>>>> structural barriers to knowledge and potential solutions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The Equity Fund is separate from the grants that are available for
>>>>>> community groups and the ongoing Grants Relaunch [3]. It is a new pool of
>>>>>> funds that we can use to directly impact knowledge equity, and specifically
>>>>>> barriers due to race that prevent access and participation in free
>>>>>> knowledge.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We are currently working to identify the first grant recipients for
>>>>>> the Equity Fund. The Meta page for the Equity Fund [4] includes more
>>>>>> information (the members of the Equity Fund Committee, the five specific
>>>>>> focus areas we will be investing in) and next steps. We are also currently
>>>>>> looking for recommendations on organizations for grants - you can visit
>>>>>> Meta or fill out this survey [5] if you have organizations that are already
>>>>>> doing this work and would be a good fit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Lastly, we do want to emphasize that this is a pilot. There are a lot
>>>>>> of open questions that have been raised by community members that we are
>>>>>> still figuring out, on topics such as ensuring investment in global
>>>>>> organizations and inclusive definitions of racial equity. We welcome
>>>>>> additional questions as the project evolves from this early stage. We’re
>>>>>> answering questions on Meta, so please join us there. We will also be
>>>>>> hosting Office Hours in the coming week:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Monday, June 13 at 0100-0200 UTC meet.google.com/myf-zcaw-ubg
>>>>>> -
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Monday, June 13 at 1500-1600 UTC meet.google.com/dzu-edej-wva
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is an active step towards addressing the barriers that
>>>>>> perpetuate knowledge gaps on our projects and prevent participation in free
>>>>>> knowledge. We’re excited to try this new pilot and share our progress.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Lisa Gruwell, Janeen Uzzell, Tony Sebro and the Equity Fund Committee
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>> https://medium.com/freely-sharing-the-sum-of-all-knowledge/we-stand-for-racial-justice-49c31afbabca?source=collection_home---4------6-----------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2020-December/096022.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [3]
>>>>>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Community_Resources/Grants_Strategy_Relaunch_2020-2021
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [4] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Equity_Fund
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [5] https://forms.gle/gzqRH7yMFEGgZb4e6
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Lisa Seitz Gruwell
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Chief Advancement Officer
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org,
>>>>>> guidelines at:
>>>>>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
>>>>>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> *Nadee Gunasena*
>>>>> Executive Communications Manager
>>>>> Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org,
>>>>> guidelines at:
>>>>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
>>>>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org,
>>>> guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
>>>> and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Lisa Seitz Gruwell
>>>
>>> Chief Advancement Officer
>>>
>>> Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines
>>> at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
>>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines
>> at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>> To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
>
>
>
> --
>
> Lisa Seitz Gruwell
>
> Chief Advancement Officer
>
> Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines
> at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
[Wikimedia-l] Re: Sharing more details about the Equity Fund [ In reply to ]
As soon as I'd sent my earlier post, I regretted not having named a non-US
outlet (however fine a publication The Root is). I realise that this, in
part, is precisely the point of the equity fund: to get away from a US and
Euro-centric approach. Mea culpa.

The Knowledge Equity Fund page on Meta says, "The first round of grant
recipients will be chosen by the Equity Fund Committee, based on an
evaluation of their existing programmatic work and how it furthers racial
equity in the context of free knowledge."

I hope the eventual grantees will not all turn out to be pre-existing Tides
grant recipients.

Andreas

On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 8:41 AM Andreas Kolbe <jayen466@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Lisa and all,
>
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 3:13 PM Lisa Gruwell <lgruwell@wikimedia.org>
> wrote:
>
>> The links to the donor FAQ are there. The smaller banners expand when
>> you click on a payment method.
>>
>
> You'll find that this information was already contained in the post you
> replied to.
>
> The point remains though: now that it exists, the knowledge equity fund
> needs publicity. At $4.5M, it is about half as much again as all the grants
> and awards disbursed to movement members in the 2019/2020 FY combined
> (which came to $9.2M, by my calculation: $22.9M total – $5M endowment –
> $8.7M Tides Advocacy). Relative to your overall annual grantmaking, this is
> a very substantial amount of money that is now available to non-affiliates
> working on racial equity issues.
>
> Moving forward, given that the decision has been made, how will racial
> equity organisations learn about the availability of this money? You are
> soliciting recommendations from Wikimedians on Meta, but surely you can't
> just rely on those and your own networks? I mentioned a blog post – to date
> there has not even been a tweet from the WMF about this. How about an
> article in The Root[1] or a similar publication?
>
> Andreas
>
> [1] https://www.theroot.com
>
>
>
>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 3:06 AM Andreas Kolbe <jayen466@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for those links, Lisa. I note that the January press release[1]
>>> merely said,
>>>
>>>
>>> *"In addition, the Foundation recently developed a $4.5 million Equity
>>> Fund that will offer grants to advance more equitable, inclusive
>>> representation in Wikimedia projects, including Wikipedia."*
>>>
>>> This tells the reader very little. In particular, it does not make clear
>>> that these are grants for recipients that would be ineligible for
>>> Wikimedia's traditional community grants.
>>>
>>> The 2019/2020 audit report[2] said, in the notes on page 14,
>>>
>>> *During the year ended June 30, 2020, the Foundation provided an
>>> unconditional grant to Tides Advocacy in the amount of of $8.723 million
>>> for the Wikimedia Knowledge Equity Fund. This fund will be used to invest
>>> in grant-making opportunities to increase the availability of free
>>> knowledge and counteract structural inequalities to foster a just and
>>> equitable representation of knowledge and people in the Wikimedia movement,
>>> and to fund the annual operating expenses of other Wikimedia chapter
>>> organizations in service of our mission of free knowledge. The Wikimedia
>>> Knowledge Equity Fund is managed and controlled by Tides Advocacy. For the
>>> year ended June 30, 2020, the amount funded is recorded in awards and
>>> grants expense.*
>>>
>>> Neither of these really provided enough detail to give the reader an
>>> adequate sense of these plans, or explained how the funds will be disbursed.
>>>
>>> $4.5 million is a substantial amount of money. It represents no less
>>> than 4% of total 2019/2020 expenses. In my view, this warrants more visible
>>> communication than a single sentence buried in a 1,000-word blog post that
>>> was about a different topic altogether, and an unpublicised page on Meta
>>> that no one but an insider is likely to find.
>>>
>>> Lastly, you say that every banner includes a link to the donor FAQ. When
>>> the Latin American fundraising campaign was announced on Spanish Wikipedia,
>>> Camille posted[3] the following to show the community what the banners
>>> would look like:
>>>
>>> Lo siento, envié URL obsoletas. Aquí están los actualizados. Desktop
>>> Large
>>> <https://es.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Wikipedias&banner=B2021_0503_esLA_dsk_p1_lg_twin1&country=CL>
>>> // Desktop Small
>>> <https://es.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Wikipedias&banner=B2021_0503_esLA_dsk_p2_sm_twin1&country=CL>
>>> // Mobile Large
>>> <https://es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia?banner=B2021_0503_esLA_m_p1_lg_twin1&country=CL>
>>> // Mobile Small
>>> <https://es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia?banner=B2021_0503_esLA_m_p2_sm_twin1&country=CL>
>>> --CDenes (WMF) <https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usuario:CDenes_(WMF)> (
>>> discusión
>>> <https://es.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Usuario_discusi%C3%B3n:CDenes_(WMF)&action=edit&redlink=1>)
>>> 19:30 30 abr 2021 (UTC)
>>>
>>> Clicking on her links on my desktop, I find that only one of the four
>>> banners (Desktop Large), as displayed on the Wikipedia page that comes up,
>>> includes a link, in small print, to the FAQ ("Preguntas frecuentes"). None
>>> of the others do. Can anyone else see such links on the pages that come up
>>> when you click on Camille's links?
>>>
>>> The recent Brazilian press screenshot available at
>>> https://img.olhardigital.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Doacao-Wikipedia.jpg
>>> lacks such a link as well, does it not? While it is in Portuguese rather
>>> than Spanish, it matches the layout of what Camille posted precisely (with
>>> the wording as adjusted following the recent community complaints at the
>>> Portuguese Village Pump).[4]
>>>
>>> As far as I can see, the user will only ever be shown a small FAQ link
>>> if and after they initiate the payment process. At that point, their
>>> attention is distracted, because they have to select a money amount or mode
>>> of payment, email option etc. This seems designed to minimise the
>>> likelihood that a user will actually go and read the FAQ.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Andreas
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> https://wikimediafoundation.org/news/2021/01/14/wikipedia-celebrates-20-years/
>>> [2]
>>> https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/foundation/f/f7/Wikimedia_Foundation_FY2019-2020_Audit_Report.pdf
>>> [3]
>>> https://es.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Café/Archivo/Miscelánea/Actual&oldid=135491333#WMF_Fundraising_on_Spanish_Wiki_in_AR,_CL,_CO,_PE,_UY
>>> [4]
>>> https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipédia:Esplanada/geral/Banner_solicitando_doações_(20abr2021)
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 1:56 AM Lisa Gruwell <lgruwell@wikimedia.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thank you to those who attended our Equity Fund Office Hours. We had a
>>>> small turnout with about three people attending the second session (evening
>>>> UTC) earlier today to speak with the Equity Fund Committee and learn more
>>>> about the fund. It was a constructive conversation and we learned of some
>>>> particular challenges in India that are barriers for participation in our
>>>> projects. We are adding the questions that were asked and the answers in
>>>> the Knowledge Equity Fund FAQ
>>>> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Equity_Fund/Frequently_asked_questions>.
>>>> Thank you to those who attended.
>>>>
>>>> My 2 cents on some of the points in this thread:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 1.
>>>>
>>>> Definitely complete the form, Sam! Those projects seem very
>>>> interesting and definitely worthy of exploration for this. Thank you for
>>>> sharing them.
>>>> 2.
>>>>
>>>> We want to be clear: This fund is insufficient to solve the
>>>> problems with Knowledge Inequity as it relates to race. We are aiming to
>>>> make progress and work with others who also advance this work.
>>>> 3.
>>>>
>>>> Knowledge Equity is a central part of the 2030 Strategic Direction
>>>> and our donors were included in the conversations that got us there. They
>>>> very much want equity to guide our work. Last year, Katherine and Janeen
>>>> published a very clear stand on racial justice
>>>> <https://medium.com/freely-sharing-the-sum-of-all-knowledge/we-stand-for-racial-justice-49c31afbabca>
>>>> that led to this fund. While we can’t mention every WMF program in the
>>>> space of a banner, we do include more information about WMF programs in the donor
>>>> FAQ <https://donate.wikimedia.org/wiki/FAQ#What_is_Wikipedia?>
>>>> which is linked on every banner with more links to our plans, annual
>>>> reports, announcements and more detail regarding our programs. In terms of
>>>> the Knowledge Equity Fund, we announced it in the press release
>>>> <https://wikimediafoundation.org/news/2021/01/14/wikipedia-celebrates-20-years/>
>>>> that we posted for Wikipedia’s 20th birthday in January in seven
>>>> languages. It is also in our 2019-2020 fiscal year Audit Report
>>>> <https://wikimediafoundation.org/about/financial-reports/>. More
>>>> information on the Knowledge Equity Fund
>>>> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Equity_Fund> is now on
>>>> meta. We look forward to sharing more information about the Fund’s
>>>> progress with the community and donors alike later this summer.
>>>> 4.
>>>>
>>>> To clarify, this is not a $4.5 million grant to Tides Advocacy for
>>>> their programs around racial inequity. Instead, the Equity Fund
>>>> Committee
>>>> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Equity_Fund#The_Equity_Fund_Committee>
>>>> sets the direction of the fund, identifies grantees and submits them to
>>>> Tides for review and administration. The Equity Fund Committee is
>>>> identifying grantees that fit in the five focus areas
>>>> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Equity_Fund#Areas_of_Funding>
>>>> to address racial inequity and free knowledge, and will benefit the
>>>> Wikimedia movement.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks again for the questions and suggestions. We welcome any
>>>> follow-up or additional questions on the Talk page
>>>> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Knowledge_Equity_Fund&action=edit&redlink=1>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> Lisa
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 9:17 AM Andreas Kolbe <jayen466@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Lisa and all,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for the info.
>>>>>
>>>>> Laudable though the goals of the Knowledge Equity Fund surely are, you
>>>>> seem to be saying that you gave $4.5 million – which readers presumably
>>>>> donated because they thought you were struggling to have enough money to
>>>>> keep Wikipedia up and running – to Tides Advocacy for the kind of
>>>>> "dismantling inequities" work that Tides Advocacy does anyway.[1]
>>>>>
>>>>> If donors had wanted to support Tides Advocacy's racial equity work,
>>>>> surely they could have donated to that organisation in the first place?
>>>>>
>>>>> Have you announced – or will you announce – this redirection of funds
>>>>> to the public, complete with an explanation of how this decision came about
>>>>> (i.e. as a result of last year's underspend, as described in your mail last
>>>>> December)?[2] At the time of writing, a Google search is unable to locate a
>>>>> related Wikimedia blog post or press release.
>>>>>
>>>>> Without such a public communication, donors will not even be aware
>>>>> that money they gave in response to banners asking for donations "to
>>>>> protect Wikipedia's independence" etc. is now going to be used for a
>>>>> different purpose altogether, one that is expressly outside of the scope of
>>>>> the conventional Wikimedia community grants that they might reasonably have
>>>>> expected their money to be used for.[3]
>>>>>
>>>>> Moreover, at some point, Wikipedia readers will no doubt be asked to
>>>>> donate another $4.5 million to meet expenses these funds could have covered
>>>>> (such as the most recent $5 million WMF donation to the endowment).
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you agree donors should be told?
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> Andreas
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] https://tidesadvocacy.org
>>>>> [2]
>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/XI5A4FKDJUK3VWOQWZIPIZXMWAMIX5IW/
>>>>> [3]
>>>>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Equity_Fund/Frequently_asked_questions#9._How_will_the_Equity_Fund_work_with_existing_grants_programmes
>>>>> ?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 6:42 PM Nadee Gunasena <
>>>>> ngunasena@wikimedia.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We realized we had shared the wrong date for the Equity Fund Office
>>>>>> Hours. Lisa's email initially said these would be Monday, June 13 - that
>>>>>> should be Monday, June 14. Sorry for any confusion - Updated times below.
>>>>>> You can also find these details and more information on Meta:
>>>>>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Equity_Fund
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Monday, June 14 at 0100-0200 UTC meet.google.com/myf-zcaw-ubg
>>>>>> -
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Monday, June 14 at 1500-1600 UTC meet.google.com/dzu-edej-wva
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 10:15 AM Lisa Gruwell <lgruwell@wikimedia.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I’m excited to share more information about the Wikimedia
>>>>>>> Foundation’s Knowledge Equity Fund.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The Equity Fund is a pilot initiative that came out of the
>>>>>>> commitment the Foundation’s leadership team made in June 2020 [1] in the
>>>>>>> wake of global protests against racial injustice. Our goal was to create a
>>>>>>> grant-making fund with an explicit focus on addressing barriers to free
>>>>>>> knowledge experienced by Black, indigenous and communities of color around
>>>>>>> the world.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is a $4.5 million USD fund to address racial inequities that
>>>>>>> impact the work of free knowledge. It was created to provide focused grants
>>>>>>> to organizations that are advancing knowledge equity, one of two key
>>>>>>> pillars of our 2030 strategic direction of becoming the essential
>>>>>>> infrastructure of free knowledge. Specifically, the fund is meant to
>>>>>>> support organizations working to address the racial injustices and barriers
>>>>>>> that prevent participation in free knowledge.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We allocated funds for the Equity Fund at the end of the
>>>>>>> Foundation’s fiscal year last June. [2] It took more time than we expected
>>>>>>> to share our plans for this pilot program, as we’ve been navigating
>>>>>>> the operational and logistical issues of creating a new type of fund.
>>>>>>> Over the past several months since the Equity Fund was first announced,
>>>>>>> Foundation staff and volunteers have been meeting to discuss the goals and
>>>>>>> the details of the Equity Fund, and we finally have more to share.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The Equity Fund will be used to support local and international
>>>>>>> organizations that don’t currently qualify for grants funding from the
>>>>>>> Foundation, such as external organizations that can help advance our
>>>>>>> mission and are not working directly on wikiprojects. We recognize that the
>>>>>>> work of knowledge equity is work that we as a movement cannot do alone. Our
>>>>>>> projects can only do so much when, for example, academic and mass media
>>>>>>> representation of marginalized communities remains insufficient, which in
>>>>>>> turn limits citations and primary sources for us to build from. Through
>>>>>>> Equity Fund investments, we wish to create an ecosystem of partners,
>>>>>>> collaborators, and grantees working on knowledge equity that will benefit
>>>>>>> the movement. This could include journalism projects to increase content
>>>>>>> about underrepresented regions of the world, or scholarship and research
>>>>>>> initiatives that are focused on expanding academic understanding of
>>>>>>> structural barriers to knowledge and potential solutions.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The Equity Fund is separate from the grants that are available for
>>>>>>> community groups and the ongoing Grants Relaunch [3]. It is a new pool of
>>>>>>> funds that we can use to directly impact knowledge equity, and specifically
>>>>>>> barriers due to race that prevent access and participation in free
>>>>>>> knowledge.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We are currently working to identify the first grant recipients for
>>>>>>> the Equity Fund. The Meta page for the Equity Fund [4] includes more
>>>>>>> information (the members of the Equity Fund Committee, the five specific
>>>>>>> focus areas we will be investing in) and next steps. We are also currently
>>>>>>> looking for recommendations on organizations for grants - you can visit
>>>>>>> Meta or fill out this survey [5] if you have organizations that are already
>>>>>>> doing this work and would be a good fit.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Lastly, we do want to emphasize that this is a pilot. There are a
>>>>>>> lot of open questions that have been raised by community members that we
>>>>>>> are still figuring out, on topics such as ensuring investment in global
>>>>>>> organizations and inclusive definitions of racial equity. We welcome
>>>>>>> additional questions as the project evolves from this early stage. We’re
>>>>>>> answering questions on Meta, so please join us there. We will also be
>>>>>>> hosting Office Hours in the coming week:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Monday, June 13 at 0100-0200 UTC meet.google.com/myf-zcaw-ubg
>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Monday, June 13 at 1500-1600 UTC meet.google.com/dzu-edej-wva
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is an active step towards addressing the barriers that
>>>>>>> perpetuate knowledge gaps on our projects and prevent participation in free
>>>>>>> knowledge. We’re excited to try this new pilot and share our progress.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Lisa Gruwell, Janeen Uzzell, Tony Sebro and the Equity Fund Committee
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>> https://medium.com/freely-sharing-the-sum-of-all-knowledge/we-stand-for-racial-justice-49c31afbabca?source=collection_home---4------6-----------------------
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2020-December/096022.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [3]
>>>>>>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Community_Resources/Grants_Strategy_Relaunch_2020-2021
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [4] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Equity_Fund
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [5] https://forms.gle/gzqRH7yMFEGgZb4e6
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Lisa Seitz Gruwell
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Chief Advancement Officer
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org,
>>>>>>> guidelines at:
>>>>>>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
>>>>>>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>>>>>>> wikimedia-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> *Nadee Gunasena*
>>>>>> Executive Communications Manager
>>>>>> Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org,
>>>>>> guidelines at:
>>>>>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
>>>>>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org,
>>>>> guidelines at:
>>>>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
>>>>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Lisa Seitz Gruwell
>>>>
>>>> Chief Advancement Officer
>>>>
>>>> Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org,
>>>> guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
>>>> and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines
>>> at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
>>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Lisa Seitz Gruwell
>>
>> Chief Advancement Officer
>>
>> Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines
>> at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>> To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
>
>