Mailing List Archive

Red Hat package signature
Hi all,

As I manage the patch management platform of my company, I have been asked
if there was a reason Varnish packages are not signed, and I did not know
what to answer.
Is there a specific reason for this, or could this packages be signed for
the upcoming versions ?

Thanks in advance for your answers,


Loïc

Loïc CHANEL
System & virtualization engineer
TO - XaaS Ind - Worldline (Villeurbanne, France)
Re: Red Hat package signature [ In reply to ]
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:59:07AM +0100, Loïc Chanel wrote:
> As I manage the patch management platform of my company, I have been asked
> if there was a reason Varnish packages are not signed, and I did not know
> what to answer.
> Is there a specific reason for this, or could this packages be signed for
> the upcoming versions ?

Hi.

Which packages are you referring to? (URLs)

The goal is that all Varnish Cache packages should be signed.

--
Lasse Karstensen
Varnish Software AS

_______________________________________________
varnish-dist mailing list
varnish-dist@varnish-cache.org
https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dist
Re: Red Hat package signature [ In reply to ]
Hi,

I am referring to these packages :
http://repo.varnish-cache.org/redhat/varnish-3.0/el6/
Good thing to know :)

Regards,


Loïc

Loïc CHANEL
System & virtualization engineer
TO - XaaS Ind - Worldline (Villeurbanne, France)

2015-10-26 17:47 GMT+01:00 Lasse Karstensen <lkarsten@varnish-software.com>:

> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:59:07AM +0100, Loďc Chanel wrote:
> > As I manage the patch management platform of my company, I have been
> asked
> > if there was a reason Varnish packages are not signed, and I did not know
> > what to answer.
> > Is there a specific reason for this, or could this packages be signed for
> > the upcoming versions ?
>
> Hi.
>
> Which packages are you referring to? (URLs)
>
> The goal is that all Varnish Cache packages should be signed.
>
> --
> Lasse Karstensen
> Varnish Software AS
>
Re: Red Hat package signature [ In reply to ]
Hi.

Varnish 3.0 is end of life.

-Lasse

On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Loïc Chanel <loic.chanel@telecomnancy.net>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I am referring to these packages :
> http://repo.varnish-cache.org/redhat/varnish-3.0/el6/
> Good thing to know :)
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Loïc
>
> Loïc CHANEL
> System & virtualization engineer
> TO - XaaS Ind - Worldline (Villeurbanne, France)
>
> 2015-10-26 17:47 GMT+01:00 Lasse Karstensen <lkarsten@varnish-software.com
> >:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:59:07AM +0100, Loďc Chanel wrote:
>> > As I manage the patch management platform of my company, I have been
>> asked
>> > if there was a reason Varnish packages are not signed, and I did not
>> know
>> > what to answer.
>> > Is there a specific reason for this, or could this packages be signed
>> for
>> > the upcoming versions ?
>>
>> Hi.
>>
>> Which packages are you referring to? (URLs)
>>
>> The goal is that all Varnish Cache packages should be signed.
>>
>> --
>> Lasse Karstensen
>> Varnish Software AS
>>
>
>


--
<http://www.varnish-software.com/>*Lasse Karstensen*
Software engineer | Varnish Software AS
Email: lkarsten@varnish-software.com
We Make Websites Fly!