Hello again,
I'm still climbing the learning curve here, having jumped from trac 0.10.5
to 1.5.3. Now that multiple repositories are supported, what is the
preferred format for trac links that reference a non-default repository? I
can't seem to find this mentioned in the documentation. Through some
searching I discovered that the following seems to work:
changeset:git_short_hash/repo
Are there other approved formats? Since git hashes are unlikely to
collide, is there a git-specific format that avoids the need to specify the
repository?
thanks,
galen
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to trac-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/trac-users/a00f9414-689b-4d16-b66f-d4e914ed138dn%40googlegroups.com.
I'm still climbing the learning curve here, having jumped from trac 0.10.5
to 1.5.3. Now that multiple repositories are supported, what is the
preferred format for trac links that reference a non-default repository? I
can't seem to find this mentioned in the documentation. Through some
searching I discovered that the following seems to work:
changeset:git_short_hash/repo
Are there other approved formats? Since git hashes are unlikely to
collide, is there a git-specific format that avoids the need to specify the
repository?
thanks,
galen
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to trac-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/trac-users/a00f9414-689b-4d16-b66f-d4e914ed138dn%40googlegroups.com.