----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Crocker" <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Newsgroups: gmane.ietf.general
To: <ietf@ietf.org>; "MAAWG technical" <technical@maawg.org>
Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2007 5:30 PM
Subject: RFC2821 Implementation Survey
> Greetings.
>
> The IETF will shortly be considering elevating the revised SMTP specification
> RFC 2821, to the second-level standards status of DRAFT.
>
> A requirement for this is to produce information about implementations of the
> protocol specification. It is therefore essential that we assemble a credible
> collection of information about actual development and interoperability
> testing -- and deployment is a form of testing -- for RFC 2821.
>
> Because SMTP is a rich and widely-deployed protocol, the goal of this query is
> to ask for enough information to be useful, but not to place undue burden on
> responders by asking them to do a massive checklist.
>
> It is assumed that most implementations of RFC 2821 have implemented all of
> its required (MUST) features and probably a fair number of its optional
> (SHOULD or MAY) features.
>
> This survey does NOT cover any specifications outside of the RFC2821 document
> itself. No enhancements, options, or the like.
>
> Please take some time to complete the following questionnaire and send me a
> private note with your responses. I will assemble them into a public report:
>
> Please respond by 10 December 2007.
>
>
>
> RFC 2821 Implementation Questionnaire
> =====================================
>
>
> 0. Contact and Description
>
> Organization Name:
>
> Implementation (Software or Service) Name:
>
>
> 1. Have you implemented RFC2821?
>
>
> 2. For how long it has been deployed?
>
>
> 3. What features have NOT been implemented from RFC2821?
>
>
> 4. What features of RFC2821 are problematic for your implementation?
>
>
> 5. Please add any other comments you wish to share:
>
>
>
>
>
> Thank you!
>
> d/
> --
>
> Dave Crocker
> Brandenburg InternetWorking
> bbiw.net
-------------------------------------------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org
Archives: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/1007/=now
RSS Feed: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/1007/
Modify Your Subscription: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=1311533&id_secret=71344863-650c76
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
From: "Dave Crocker" <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Newsgroups: gmane.ietf.general
To: <ietf@ietf.org>; "MAAWG technical" <technical@maawg.org>
Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2007 5:30 PM
Subject: RFC2821 Implementation Survey
> Greetings.
>
> The IETF will shortly be considering elevating the revised SMTP specification
> RFC 2821, to the second-level standards status of DRAFT.
>
> A requirement for this is to produce information about implementations of the
> protocol specification. It is therefore essential that we assemble a credible
> collection of information about actual development and interoperability
> testing -- and deployment is a form of testing -- for RFC 2821.
>
> Because SMTP is a rich and widely-deployed protocol, the goal of this query is
> to ask for enough information to be useful, but not to place undue burden on
> responders by asking them to do a massive checklist.
>
> It is assumed that most implementations of RFC 2821 have implemented all of
> its required (MUST) features and probably a fair number of its optional
> (SHOULD or MAY) features.
>
> This survey does NOT cover any specifications outside of the RFC2821 document
> itself. No enhancements, options, or the like.
>
> Please take some time to complete the following questionnaire and send me a
> private note with your responses. I will assemble them into a public report:
>
> Please respond by 10 December 2007.
>
>
>
> RFC 2821 Implementation Questionnaire
> =====================================
>
>
> 0. Contact and Description
>
> Organization Name:
>
> Implementation (Software or Service) Name:
>
>
> 1. Have you implemented RFC2821?
>
>
> 2. For how long it has been deployed?
>
>
> 3. What features have NOT been implemented from RFC2821?
>
>
> 4. What features of RFC2821 are problematic for your implementation?
>
>
> 5. Please add any other comments you wish to share:
>
>
>
>
>
> Thank you!
>
> d/
> --
>
> Dave Crocker
> Brandenburg InternetWorking
> bbiw.net
-------------------------------------------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org
Archives: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/1007/=now
RSS Feed: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/1007/
Modify Your Subscription: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=1311533&id_secret=71344863-650c76
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com