Been following the threads in the mailing list (this and SA-Talk) for
spam with Random
Words (both in Subject and/or Body). This, apparently, is the only type
of spam that manage to bypass our amavid-new+SA+postfix on a FreeBSD 4.8
box (virii-scanner is DrWeb). However, the threads on this subject died
out two weeks ago; unless I missed a few important threads, there wasnt
a definitive conclusion.
What the most (official)ish stand in combating this sort of Spam? Didnt
see any rules against it in 2.63, and there was a (negative) note on
training the bayes with hundreds of these messages. There's been
discussion of making custom SA rules to training the bayes with all of
these messages/emails, with someone mentioning the later types of these
Spam included punctuations which wasnt accounted for in the rules.
Feedback/pointers in this matter is greatly appreciated.
Thanks
--
Feisal
Webcraft Solutions - http://www.webcraftsolutions.com
--------------------------------------
You can only live once, but if you do it right, once is enough.
spam with Random
Words (both in Subject and/or Body). This, apparently, is the only type
of spam that manage to bypass our amavid-new+SA+postfix on a FreeBSD 4.8
box (virii-scanner is DrWeb). However, the threads on this subject died
out two weeks ago; unless I missed a few important threads, there wasnt
a definitive conclusion.
What the most (official)ish stand in combating this sort of Spam? Didnt
see any rules against it in 2.63, and there was a (negative) note on
training the bayes with hundreds of these messages. There's been
discussion of making custom SA rules to training the bayes with all of
these messages/emails, with someone mentioning the later types of these
Spam included punctuations which wasnt accounted for in the rules.
Feedback/pointers in this matter is greatly appreciated.
Thanks
--
Feisal
Webcraft Solutions - http://www.webcraftsolutions.com
--------------------------------------
You can only live once, but if you do it right, once is enough.