I just installed pyzor and did a random spot check of about 10 spam
emails to try to evaluate it using this command:
pyzor check < some_spam
Only one message gave me a hit on pyzor.
But I take my results with a grain of salt because I may not have pyzor
configured optimally.
For one, I'm using the public pyzor server. Maybe there are other more
useful servers?
Second, I'm not sure if my tests will work on my spam samples which have
the spam encapsulated with the "report_safe" setting set to a value of
"1". By the way, anyone know of a CLI utility for extracting the
original spam email from these files?
So before I explore pyzor any further, I'm wondering if the default
rules built into SA are good enough or if pyzor improves the accuracy of
SA enough to be worth the extra cycles to install it and keep it
functional.
What do you think?
emails to try to evaluate it using this command:
pyzor check < some_spam
Only one message gave me a hit on pyzor.
But I take my results with a grain of salt because I may not have pyzor
configured optimally.
For one, I'm using the public pyzor server. Maybe there are other more
useful servers?
Second, I'm not sure if my tests will work on my spam samples which have
the spam encapsulated with the "report_safe" setting set to a value of
"1". By the way, anyone know of a CLI utility for extracting the
original spam email from these files?
So before I explore pyzor any further, I'm wondering if the default
rules built into SA are good enough or if pyzor improves the accuracy of
SA enough to be worth the extra cycles to install it and keep it
functional.
What do you think?