Mailing List Archive: ANN: ReturnPath rule renaming

ANN: ReturnPath rule renaming

Mar 26, 2021, 7:17 AM

Post #1 of 3 (359 views)

All:

In order to bring the SenderScore/ReturnPath DNS reputation and blocklist
rules up-to-date with their current ownership and administration, the
rules are being renamed:

RCVD_IN_RP_CERTIFIED -> RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED
RCVD_IN_RP_SAFE -> RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE
RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL -> RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL

Please audit your local config for score overrides and meta rules
depending on the old names.

--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhardin@impsec.org pgpk -a jhardin@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79

Re: ANN: ReturnPath rule renaming [ In reply to ]

dwreski at guardiandigital

Mar 26, 2021, 6:54 PM

Post #2 of 3 (357 views)

Permalink

Hi,

> RCVD_IN_RP_CERTIFIED -> RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED
> RCVD_IN_RP_SAFE -> RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE
> RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL -> RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL
>
> Please audit your local config for score overrides and meta rules
> depending on the old names.

I don't see that the VALIDITY rules exist yet. Will they be in tonight's
update?

How do you recommend we manage the period where the old rules with our
meta rules are not invalidated with the publishing of the new rules?

We could duplicate our rules with the old and new, but just wanted to
see if there was a plan already for dealing with this.

dave

Re: ANN: ReturnPath rule renaming [ In reply to ]

jhardin at impsec

Mar 26, 2021, 7:20 PM

Post #3 of 3 (357 views)

Permalink

On Fri, 26 Mar 2021, Dave Wreski wrote:

> Hi,
>
>> RCVD_IN_RP_CERTIFIED -> RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED
>> RCVD_IN_RP_SAFE -> RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE
>> RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL -> RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL
>>
>> Please audit your local config for score overrides and meta rules depending
>> on the old names.
>
> I don't see that the VALIDITY rules exist yet. Will they be in tonight's
> update?

The change went in today, they should go through masscheck and be
published tomorrow.

> How do you recommend we manage the period where the old rules with our meta
> rules are not invalidated with the publishing of the new rules?
>
> We could duplicate our rules with the old and new, but just wanted to see if
> there was a plan already for dealing with this.

I'd be a bit surprised if anyone was actually meta'ing them.

It's not a fatal lint error, you only see a warning if you run with -D.
Duplicating any such rules now and cleaning up in a day or two is probably
a reasonable approach.

--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhardin@impsec.org pgpk -a jhardin@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
...to announce there must be no criticism of the President or to
stand by the President right or wrong is not only unpatriotic and
servile, but is morally treasonous to the American public.
-- Theodore Roosevelt, 1918
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
300 days since the first private commercial manned orbital mission (SpaceX)