Mailing List Archive

On 10.02.21 07:58, Jared Hall wrote:
>Hope this is useful.? Good enough for Noobs, but interesting enough
>for Pros; a little module with a whole lot of 'tude!
>Standard boilerplate introduction:

looks useful, however, seems that you made checking rules (great)
and mixed them with automatic scoring.

I'd prefer separating those


>Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::CHAOS
>
>A self-scoring cornucopia of spam-fighting utilities
>
>Created by: Jared Hall
>
>Contact: https://jaredsec.com/
>
>License Type: MIT License
>
>Status: Active
>
>Maintained as of: 2021-02-10
>
>Added: 2021-02-10
>
>Available at: https://github.com/telecom2k3/CHAOS

--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Your mouse has moved. Windows NT will now restart for changes to take
to take effect. [OK]

> >Hope this is useful. Good enough for Noobs, but interesting enough
> >for Pros; a little module with a whole lot of 'tude!
> >Standard boilerplate introduction:
>
> looks useful, however, seems that you made checking rules (great)
> and mixed them with automatic scoring.
>
> I'd prefer separating those

Yes, I was just going to ask the same thing - is this automatically
scoring sendgrid emails with 2.1 points?

* 2.0 JR_TITLECASE HEADER: CHAOS.pm Subject in Title Case
* 2.1 JR_HAS_SENDGRID HEADER: CHAOS.pm detection: Sendgrid in Headers

It seems also KAM is automatically scoring sendgrid emails with
another 1.5 points, just for being processed by sendgrid?

What does "Subject in Title Case" mean?

* 1.5 KAM_SENDGRID Sendgrid being exploited by scammers

Would someone summarize the status of sendgrid right now? If it's not
the case sendgrid is categorically just being marked, can we include
the domain or email address in the rule description to make it more
clear?

On 2021-02-22 16:00, Alex wrote:

> Would someone summarize the status of sendgrid right now? If it's not
> the case sendgrid is categorically just being marked, can we include
> the domain or email address in the rule description to make it more
> clear?

can sendgrid stop dkim sign all mails ?

dkim signing should only happend for origined mails, not mails that pass
a server, this is why openARC is created to solve this, but sendgrid
have fokus on dmarc solves all kind of problems so not there problem
with dkim sign all mails

let me hold your pucket, so i dont need to

imho sendgrid deserves to be on fokus