Mailing List Archive: [Bug 7189] DMARC Plugin Specification / Discussion

[Bug 7189] DMARC Plugin Specification / Discussion

May 18, 2021, 3:16 AM

Post #1 of 4 (172 views)

https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7189

Giovanni Bechis <giovanni@paclan.it> changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |giovanni@paclan.it

--- Comment #7 from Giovanni Bechis <giovanni@paclan.it> ---
On https://github.com/bigio/spamassassin-dmarc there is a working Dmarc plugin,
atm it does queries and can be configured to store reports using Mail::Dmarc.
Arm it does not read authentication headers.

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 7189] DMARC Plugin Specification / Discussion [ In reply to ]

bugzilla-daemon at spamassassin

May 18, 2021, 3:51 AM

Post #2 of 4 (172 views)

Permalink

https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7189

--- Comment #8 from Henrik Krohns <apache@hege.li> ---
(In reply to Giovanni Bechis from comment #7)
> On https://github.com/bigio/spamassassin-dmarc there is a working Dmarc
> plugin,
> atm it does queries and can be configured to store reports using Mail::Dmarc.
> Arm it does not read authentication headers.

Atleast it shouldn't use uri_to_domain. Mail::DMARC does it's own correct
processing with Public Suffix List.

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 7189] DMARC Plugin Specification / Discussion [ In reply to ]

bugzilla-daemon at spamassassin

May 18, 2021, 5:42 AM

Post #3 of 4 (172 views)

Permalink

https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7189

--- Comment #9 from Benny Pedersen <me@junc.eu> ---
dont forget ARC, thats why i say AuthRes needs more love, mail-dkim nearly have
all that is needed for dkim, arc, and authres, and end in dmarc, dmarc must
validate arc chains, just using spf, dkim, is a fail for dmarc

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 7189] DMARC Plugin Specification / Discussion [ In reply to ]

bugzilla-daemon at spamassassin

May 18, 2021, 8:32 AM

Post #4 of 4 (172 views)

Permalink

https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7189

--- Comment #10 from Giovanni Bechis <giovanni@paclan.it> ---
(In reply to Henrik Krohns from comment #8)
> (In reply to Giovanni Bechis from comment #7)
> > On https://github.com/bigio/spamassassin-dmarc there is a working Dmarc
> > plugin,
> > atm it does queries and can be configured to store reports using Mail::Dmarc.
> > Arm it does not read authentication headers.
>
> Atleast it shouldn't use uri_to_domain. Mail::DMARC does it's own correct
> processing with Public Suffix List.

I have uncommitted code that get rid of uri_to_domain calls.

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.