https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7863
Henrik Krohns <apache@hege.li> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |apache@hege.li
--- Comment #4 from Henrik Krohns <apache@hege.li> ---
There's really no point to these kinds of rules in stock ruleset, every site
has different attachment policies. Others might want to allow something that
others might not. It would be impossible to masscheck reliably, so everything
would be scored 0.001. Or you would have simply hundred different
__ATTACHMENT_XYZ rules just taking space and memory, hoping that someone would
use them instead of just making local rules like most probably do.
Also it's completely another thing to detect actual content vs relying on
provided filename extension. Stuff like this should be a generic file type
detection plugin.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
Henrik Krohns <apache@hege.li> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |apache@hege.li
--- Comment #4 from Henrik Krohns <apache@hege.li> ---
There's really no point to these kinds of rules in stock ruleset, every site
has different attachment policies. Others might want to allow something that
others might not. It would be impossible to masscheck reliably, so everything
would be scored 0.001. Or you would have simply hundred different
__ATTACHMENT_XYZ rules just taking space and memory, hoping that someone would
use them instead of just making local rules like most probably do.
Also it's completely another thing to detect actual content vs relying on
provided filename extension. Stuff like this should be a generic file type
detection plugin.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.