Mailing List Archive

[Bug 7733] New plugin for Spamassassin to use Spamhaus Technology DQS
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7733

Henrik Krohns <apache@hege.li> changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |apache@hege.li

--- Comment #1 from Henrik Krohns <apache@hege.li> ---
Hello, if you are suggesting adding the plugin officially to SpamAssassin,
there is really no need for it. I will be implementing all the currently
missing functions for specific helo/header dnsbl checks directly in SA core.
HashBL can already query body emails and uris, will look into NS checks for
emails.

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 7733] New plugin for Spamassassin to use Spamhaus Technology DQS [ In reply to ]
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7733

Riccardo Alfieri <riccardo.alfieri@spamteq.com> changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |riccardo.alfieri@spamteq.co
| |m

--- Comment #2 from Riccardo Alfieri <riccardo.alfieri@spamteq.com> ---
Well yes, if you can implement the functions it will be easier for sure.

I know HashBL, but I don't know if it can do what we currently do with body
emails, that is taking the @domain part of it and checking it on various
DNSBls.

If you can manage to add that function too we will only provide the rules for
spamassassin's users that want to use them with DQS

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 7733] New plugin for Spamassassin to use Spamhaus Technology DQS [ In reply to ]
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7733

--- Comment #3 from Henrik Krohns <apache@hege.li> ---
(In reply to Riccardo Alfieri from comment #2)
> Well yes, if you can implement the functions it will be easier for sure.
>
> I know HashBL, but I don't know if it can do what we currently do with body
> emails, that is taking the @domain part of it and checking it on various
> DNSBls.

Right, I will also be implementing domains_only or similar option for it.. all
these will be looked into 4.0.0, it will take some time since I will try to
make everything much more flexible, while trying to maintain some order for
these, perhaps reorganizing plugins/functions/flags better. But since people
still use even SpamAssassin 3.3, all this legacy baggage of different plugins
and configuration clauses is terrible and most likely will require lots of
if/endifs for different versions. :-)

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 7733] New plugin for Spamassassin to use Spamhaus Technology DQS [ In reply to ]
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7733

--- Comment #4 from Riccardo Alfieri <riccardo.alfieri@spamteq.com> ---
Would it make sense to add it to 3.4.3 (or 3.4.4?), to have users using it
before 4.0.0 is shipped?

Obviously this will depend on the timeline on 4.0.0 release

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 7733] New plugin for Spamassassin to use Spamhaus Technology DQS [ In reply to ]
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7733

--- Comment #5 from Henrik Krohns <apache@hege.li> ---
No 3.4.3 should be released as soon as possible, it's already in rc4 stage.
Hopefully it will be last 3.4 release. These are too major changes for it.

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 7733] New plugin for Spamassassin to use Spamhaus Technology DQS [ In reply to ]
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7733

--- Comment #6 from Riccardo Alfieri <riccardo.alfieri@spamteq.com> ---
Ok, sounds correct.

I'll keep supporting the plugin for 3.4.1-3 while waiting for the next major
release.

If you need help in porting features to 4.0.0 let me know, I'm available to
help.

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 7733] New plugin for Spamassassin to use Spamhaus Technology DQS [ In reply to ]
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7733

Giovanni Bechis <giovanni@paclan.it> changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |giovanni@paclan.it

--- Comment #7 from Giovanni Bechis <giovanni@paclan.it> ---
(In reply to Henrik Krohns from comment #1)
> Hello, if you are suggesting adding the plugin officially to SpamAssassin,
> there is really no need for it. I will be implementing all the currently
> missing functions for specific helo/header dnsbl checks directly in SA core.
> HashBL can already query body emails and uris, will look into NS checks for
> emails.

Are you referring to Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DNSEval::check_rbl_ns_from()
or to a new addiction ?

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 7733] New plugin for Spamassassin to use Spamhaus Technology DQS [ In reply to ]
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7733

Henrik Krohns <apache@hege.li> changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #8 from Henrik Krohns <apache@hege.li> ---
Continued in Bug 7734.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 7734 ***

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.