Date: 2004-07-26T07:16:55
Editor: GregAmy <grega03@pobox.com>
Wiki: SpamAssassin Wiki
Page: BayesFaq
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/BayesFaq
no comment
Change Log:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -21,4 +21,7 @@
Why don't my old bayes_* files work on my new server (tie failed)?: DbDumpAndLoad
Will I overtrain Spamassassin if I feed it ''all'' my hams and ''all'' my spams?[[BR]]
-Answer: No. As long as you ensure that everything fed to Bayes is accurately classified, manually verified, then you can only improve Bayes' accuracy by training it on everything.
+Answer: No. As long as you ensure that everything fed to Bayes is accurately classified, manually verified, then you can only improve Bayes' accuracy by training it on everything.
+
+Running parallel fault-tolerant SpamAssassin servers?: BayesBitMe
+
Editor: GregAmy <grega03@pobox.com>
Wiki: SpamAssassin Wiki
Page: BayesFaq
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/BayesFaq
no comment
Change Log:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -21,4 +21,7 @@
Why don't my old bayes_* files work on my new server (tie failed)?: DbDumpAndLoad
Will I overtrain Spamassassin if I feed it ''all'' my hams and ''all'' my spams?[[BR]]
-Answer: No. As long as you ensure that everything fed to Bayes is accurately classified, manually verified, then you can only improve Bayes' accuracy by training it on everything.
+Answer: No. As long as you ensure that everything fed to Bayes is accurately classified, manually verified, then you can only improve Bayes' accuracy by training it on everything.
+
+Running parallel fault-tolerant SpamAssassin servers?: BayesBitMe
+