Hi
Just trying to clarify If an omfile action written with RainerScript syntax will honour legacy declared $FileOwner / $FileGroup
For example :
$FileOwner root
$FileGroup example
action(type="omfile" template="test" file="/var/log/test_file")
I have tried this and it seems the action will honour the legacy declaration of default file ownership. However, is this configuration considered acceptable or it is something that should be avoided (according to doc *)?
Thanks
* "Be warned that legacy action format is hard to get right. It is recommended to use RainerScript-Style action format whenever possible"
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
https://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
Just trying to clarify If an omfile action written with RainerScript syntax will honour legacy declared $FileOwner / $FileGroup
For example :
$FileOwner root
$FileGroup example
action(type="omfile" template="test" file="/var/log/test_file")
I have tried this and it seems the action will honour the legacy declaration of default file ownership. However, is this configuration considered acceptable or it is something that should be avoided (according to doc *)?
Thanks
* "Be warned that legacy action format is hard to get right. It is recommended to use RainerScript-Style action format whenever possible"
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
https://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.