Would like to know your experience with imtcp and/or imptcp.
With +1100 established TCP connection we get ~100% CPU usage on imtcp
thread causing the TCP stack/connections being stalled/not possible to
establish.
TOP screen:
Threads: 295 total, 3 running, 292 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
%Cpu0 : 21.6 us, 76.5 sy, 0.0 ni, 0.0 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 2.0 si,
0.0 st
%Cpu1 : 7.5 us, 5.7 sy, 0.0 ni, 83.0 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 3.8 si,
0.0 st
KiB Mem: 8197852 total, 7946872 used, 250980 free, 33520 buffers
KiB Swap: 1048572 total, 164648 used, 883924 free. 7067060 cached Mem
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
13760 loglin 20 0 826836 24972 4676 R 90.6 0.3 64:33.11 in:imtcp
13761 loglin 20 0 826836 24972 4676 R 5.9 0.3 8:09.49 rs:main
Q:Reg
857 root 20 0 25764 3024 2492 S 2.0 0.0 0:02.72 top
12871 loglocal 20 0 757816 19452 712 S 2.0 0.2 150:04.44 in:imtcp
13762 loglin 20 0 826836 24972 4676 S 2.0 0.3 1:59.07 in:imtcp
Is that expected behavior? What is the suitable number of connections and
throughput imtcp can handle?
--
Peter
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
With +1100 established TCP connection we get ~100% CPU usage on imtcp
thread causing the TCP stack/connections being stalled/not possible to
establish.
TOP screen:
Threads: 295 total, 3 running, 292 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
%Cpu0 : 21.6 us, 76.5 sy, 0.0 ni, 0.0 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 2.0 si,
0.0 st
%Cpu1 : 7.5 us, 5.7 sy, 0.0 ni, 83.0 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 3.8 si,
0.0 st
KiB Mem: 8197852 total, 7946872 used, 250980 free, 33520 buffers
KiB Swap: 1048572 total, 164648 used, 883924 free. 7067060 cached Mem
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
13760 loglin 20 0 826836 24972 4676 R 90.6 0.3 64:33.11 in:imtcp
13761 loglin 20 0 826836 24972 4676 R 5.9 0.3 8:09.49 rs:main
Q:Reg
857 root 20 0 25764 3024 2492 S 2.0 0.0 0:02.72 top
12871 loglocal 20 0 757816 19452 712 S 2.0 0.2 150:04.44 in:imtcp
13762 loglin 20 0 826836 24972 4676 S 2.0 0.3 1:59.07 in:imtcp
Is that expected behavior? What is the suitable number of connections and
throughput imtcp can handle?
--
Peter
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.