Advanced
Mailing List Archive

Mailing List Archive

  1. Home >
  2. Quagga>
  3. Dev
[PATCH] Fix secondary usage in zebra daemon
hasso at estpak
Jan 29, 2004, 3:46 AM
Post #1 of 4 (867 views)
Permalink
After enetering "ip address x.x.x.x/x label eth0:1" command there will
be "ip address x.x.x.x/x secondary label eth0:1" line in
configuration. But zebra doesn't accept this command => zebra refuses
to start with this line in configuration file.

I know that there is discussion to remove secondary stuff at all, but
until then this harmless patch will fix it.

--
Hasso Tepper
Elion Enterprises Ltd.
WAN administrator

Attached Files:

Re: [PATCH] Fix secondary usage in zebra daemon [ In reply to ]
gilad.arnold at terayon
Jan 29, 2004, 4:56 AM
Post #2 of 4 (869 views)
Permalink
Hasso Tepper wrote:

> After enetering "ip address x.x.x.x/x label eth0:1" command there will
> be "ip address x.x.x.x/x secondary label eth0:1" line in
> configuration. But zebra doesn't accept this command => zebra refuses
> to start with this line in configuration file.

Wasn't that already suggested in [quagga-dev 37] and followups? I
figured it was already in CVS...

Gilad
Re: [PATCH] Fix secondary usage in zebra daemon [ In reply to ]
hasso at estpak
Jan 29, 2004, 5:29 AM
Post #3 of 4 (858 views)
Permalink
Gilad Arnold wrote:
> Hasso Tepper wrote:
> > After enetering "ip address x.x.x.x/x label eth0:1" command there
> > will be "ip address x.x.x.x/x secondary label eth0:1" line in
> > configuration. But zebra doesn't accept this command => zebra
> > refuses to start with this line in configuration file.
>
> Wasn't that already suggested in [quagga-dev 37] and followups? I
> figured it was already in CVS...

No. Seems that discussion just ended there. Can we finally decide what
to do? Current non working behavior should be fixed somehow finally.

--
Hasso Tepper
Elion Enterprises Ltd.
WAN administrator
Re: [PATCH] Fix secondary usage in zebra daemon [ In reply to ]
paul at clubi
Jan 29, 2004, 5:43 AM
Post #4 of 4 (863 views)
Permalink
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004, Hasso Tepper wrote:

> No. Seems that discussion just ended there. Can we finally decide
> what to do? Current non working behavior should be fixed somehow
> finally.

agreed, should be fixed.

regards,
--
Paul Jakma paul@clubi.ie paul@jakma.org Key ID: 64A2FF6A
warning: do not ever send email to spam@dishone.st
Fortune:
Real programmers don't write in BASIC. Actually, no programmers write in
BASIC after reaching puberty.

©2024 GT.net. A Gossamer Threads company.
5th Floor, 455 Granville St., Vancouver, BC V6C 1T1, Canada | Legal