Just another revision to fix a couple of problems:
* Added 'show bgp rsclient NEIGHBOR X:X::X:X' and 'show bgp rsclient NEIGHBOR
X:X::X:X/M' (as well as the IPv4 versions of both). These commands display
information about a route or prefix in some RS-Client's RIB at the Route
Server
* Corrected a bug about global nexthop for IPv6 routes defined with 'network
...' commands: If the global nexthop of such routes was modified by a
route-map (either the route-map in 'network X:X::X:X/M route-map WORD' or the
Import route-map of some RS-client), the global nexthop appeared correctly
modified in local RIBs, but before being sent to remote peers, the IPv6
global nexthop was always overwriten. The reason was that instead of checking
wether the IPv6 nexthop is 0::0, function 'bgp_announce_check' checked wether
the route comes from bgp->peer_self.
* Fixed the order of Import/Export route-maps when shown by 'show bgp
rsclient command'
* IPv4 version of the 'show bgp rsclient (A.B.C.D|X:X::X:X)' command is now
available
As always, I will welcome any feedback :-)
Regards,
Jose
* Added 'show bgp rsclient NEIGHBOR X:X::X:X' and 'show bgp rsclient NEIGHBOR
X:X::X:X/M' (as well as the IPv4 versions of both). These commands display
information about a route or prefix in some RS-Client's RIB at the Route
Server
* Corrected a bug about global nexthop for IPv6 routes defined with 'network
...' commands: If the global nexthop of such routes was modified by a
route-map (either the route-map in 'network X:X::X:X/M route-map WORD' or the
Import route-map of some RS-client), the global nexthop appeared correctly
modified in local RIBs, but before being sent to remote peers, the IPv6
global nexthop was always overwriten. The reason was that instead of checking
wether the IPv6 nexthop is 0::0, function 'bgp_announce_check' checked wether
the route comes from bgp->peer_self.
* Fixed the order of Import/Export route-maps when shown by 'show bgp
rsclient command'
* IPv4 version of the 'show bgp rsclient (A.B.C.D|X:X::X:X)' command is now
available
As always, I will welcome any feedback :-)
Regards,
Jose