Mailing List Archive

On Mon, 29 Dec 2003, Pan Zhen Yu wrote:

> I think one deamon one telnet configuration port is crazy. In fact
> only one port is enough, just like vtysh, we use one telnet port,
> such as 2666, to configure all the deamon. It is very easy, I
> think.

maybe one day, possibly, hopefully. indeed, I think i probably will
configure the telnet port disabled altogether in my RPM builds ->
make vtysh the default access method.

regards,
--
Paul Jakma paul@clubi.ie paul@jakma.org Key ID: 64A2FF6A
warning: do not ever send email to spam@dishone.st
Fortune:
The "cutting edge" is getting rather dull.
-- Andy Purshottam

--On Friday, January 2, 2004 4:05 AM +0000 Paul Jakma <paul@clubi.ie> wrote:

> On Mon, 29 Dec 2003, Pan Zhen Yu wrote:
>
>> I think one deamon one telnet configuration port is crazy. In fact
>> only one port is enough, just like vtysh, we use one telnet port,
>> such as 2666, to configure all the deamon. It is very easy, I
>> think.
>
> maybe one day, possibly, hopefully. indeed, I think i probably will
> configure the telnet port disabled altogether in my RPM builds ->
> make vtysh the default access method.

Some of us *only* run bgpd. I have no interest in running another daemon
just to get access to one that is already running.