Hi all,
Would there be any problem with documenting PL_phase_names in perlapi? PL_phase is documented since 5.32, but we document the means by which the phase name is available.
I’ll submit a PR if it sounds agreeable.
Thank you!
cheers,
-FG
Would there be any problem with documenting PL_phase_names in perlapi? PL_phase is documented since 5.32, but we document the means by which the phase name is available.
I’ll submit a PR if it sounds agreeable.
Thank you!
cheers,
-FG