Wondering if we should *up level* to Multi-Cloud, where Hybrid Cloud can be
a subset of Multi-Cloud.
I think Scientific SIG can still focus on Scientific and HPC, whereas
Multi/Hybrid Cloud will support broader use cases.
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 8:22 AM Stig Telfer <stig@telfer.org> wrote:
> You are right to make the connection - this is a subject that regularly
> comes up in the discussions of the Scientific SIG, though it’s just one of
> many use cases for hybrid cloud. If a new SIG was created around hybrid
> cloud, it would be useful to have it closely connected with the Scientific
> SIG.
>
> Cheers,
> Stig
>
>
> > On 13 Nov 2018, at 09:01, <Arkady.Kanevsky@dell.com> <
> Arkady.Kanevsky@dell.com> wrote:
> >
> > Good point.
> > Adding SIG list.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jeremy Stanley [mailto:fungi@yuggoth.org]
> > Sent: Monday, November 12, 2018 4:46 PM
> > To: openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org
> > Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] new SIGs to cover use cases
> >
> >
> > [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
> > Please report any suspicious attachments, links, or requests for
> sensitive information.
> >
> >
> > On 2018-11-12 15:46:38 +0000 (+0000), Arkady.Kanevsky@dell.com wrote:
> > [...]
> >> 1. Do we have or want to create a user community around Hybrid cloud.
> > [...]
> >> 2. As we target AI/ML as 2019 target application domain do we
> >> want to create a SIG for it? Or do we extend scientific
> >> community SIG to cover it?
> > [...]
> >
> > It may also be worthwhile to ask this on the openstack-sigs mailing
> > list.
> > --
> > Jeremy Stanley
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OpenStack-operators mailing list
> > OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> openstack-sigs mailing list
> openstack-sigs@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-sigs
>
a subset of Multi-Cloud.
I think Scientific SIG can still focus on Scientific and HPC, whereas
Multi/Hybrid Cloud will support broader use cases.
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 8:22 AM Stig Telfer <stig@telfer.org> wrote:
> You are right to make the connection - this is a subject that regularly
> comes up in the discussions of the Scientific SIG, though it’s just one of
> many use cases for hybrid cloud. If a new SIG was created around hybrid
> cloud, it would be useful to have it closely connected with the Scientific
> SIG.
>
> Cheers,
> Stig
>
>
> > On 13 Nov 2018, at 09:01, <Arkady.Kanevsky@dell.com> <
> Arkady.Kanevsky@dell.com> wrote:
> >
> > Good point.
> > Adding SIG list.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jeremy Stanley [mailto:fungi@yuggoth.org]
> > Sent: Monday, November 12, 2018 4:46 PM
> > To: openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org
> > Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] new SIGs to cover use cases
> >
> >
> > [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
> > Please report any suspicious attachments, links, or requests for
> sensitive information.
> >
> >
> > On 2018-11-12 15:46:38 +0000 (+0000), Arkady.Kanevsky@dell.com wrote:
> > [...]
> >> 1. Do we have or want to create a user community around Hybrid cloud.
> > [...]
> >> 2. As we target AI/ML as 2019 target application domain do we
> >> want to create a SIG for it? Or do we extend scientific
> >> community SIG to cover it?
> > [...]
> >
> > It may also be worthwhile to ask this on the openstack-sigs mailing
> > list.
> > --
> > Jeremy Stanley
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OpenStack-operators mailing list
> > OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> openstack-sigs mailing list
> openstack-sigs@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-sigs
>