Mailing List Archive

Hi Kyle,

Whenever I see a bug that I think is a good match, I try to tag it with
low-hanging-fruit. I think I'll update the link on the wiki page to be the
following, which limits the query to issues that have been confirmed as
real bugs:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/quantum/+bugs?field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&field.status%3Alist=TRIAGED&field.status%3Alist=INPROGRESS&field.tag=low-hanging-fruit

We've been pretty fortunate to have people pitching in and handling the
low-hang-fruit issues, so there aren't a lot right now.

I would call attention to a couple of the items on:
http://wiki.openstack.org/QuantumStarterBugs

Particularly, work on system testing (tempest or devstack) or helping
Arvind with the Horizon + quantum integration. If you're looking for some
more involved projects, I can probably give you some ideas as well.
However, some of these projects are on the critical path for Folsom, so
its up to you as to whether they would be a good match for the developer if
they do not have a lot of experience working with Quantum.

Dan

On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Kyle Mestery (kmestery) <kmestery@cisco.com
> wrote:

> Quantum devs:
>
> Is this list of low hanging fruit bugs still accurate:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/quantum/+bugs?field.tag=low-hanging-fruit
>
> Looks like out of the 7 on this list, 5 have already been committed. Are
> there any new bugs that could be added to this list for new folks to work
> on?
>
> I have some new folks that will be looking to contribute to Quantum soon,
> looking to get them started with something easy to get their feet wet.
>
> Thanks!
> Kyle
>
>
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~netstack
> Post to : netstack@lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~netstack
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>



--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dan Wendlandt
Nicira, Inc: www.nicira.com
twitter: danwendlandt
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Hi,
I have just opened https://bugs.launchpad.net/quantum/+bug/1015148. I
think that this may be a good way of getting involved. In my opinion it
needs to be addressed with Quantum and the Quantum client - which gives
a nice introduction.
Thanks
Gary

On 06/19/2012 05:26 PM, Dan Wendlandt wrote:
> Hi Kyle,
>
> Whenever I see a bug that I think is a good match, I try to tag it
> with low-hanging-fruit. I think I'll update the link on the wiki page
> to be the following, which limits the query to issues that have been
> confirmed as real bugs:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/quantum/+bugs?field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&field.status%3Alist=TRIAGED&field.status%3Alist=INPROGRESS&field.tag=low-hanging-fruit
> <https://bugs.launchpad.net/quantum/+bugs?field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&field.status%3Alist=TRIAGED&field.status%3Alist=INPROGRESS&field.tag=low-hanging-fruit>
>
> We've been pretty fortunate to have people pitching in and handling
> the low-hang-fruit issues, so there aren't a lot right now.
>
> I would call attention to a couple of the items on:
> http://wiki.openstack.org/QuantumStarterBugs
>
> Particularly, work on system testing (tempest or devstack) or helping
> Arvind with the Horizon + quantum integration. If you're looking for
> some more involved projects, I can probably give you some ideas as
> well. However, some of these projects are on the critical path for
> Folsom, so its up to you as to whether they would be a good match for
> the developer if they do not have a lot of experience working with
> Quantum.
>
> Dan
>
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Kyle Mestery (kmestery)
> <kmestery@cisco.com <mailto:kmestery@cisco.com>> wrote:
>
> Quantum devs:
>
> Is this list of low hanging fruit bugs still accurate:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/quantum/+bugs?field.tag=low-hanging-fruit
>
> Looks like out of the 7 on this list, 5 have already been
> committed. Are there any new bugs that could be added to this list
> for new folks to work on?
>
> I have some new folks that will be looking to contribute to
> Quantum soon, looking to get them started with something easy to
> get their feet wet.
>
> Thanks!
> Kyle
>
>
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~netstack
> <https://launchpad.net/%7Enetstack>
> Post to : netstack@lists.launchpad.net
> <mailto:netstack@lists.launchpad.net>
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~netstack
> <https://launchpad.net/%7Enetstack>
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
>
>
> --
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Dan Wendlandt
> Nicira, Inc: www.nicira.com <http://www.nicira.com>
> twitter: danwendlandt
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>

Thanks guys, I'll take a look at the link Dan provided and the bug Gary just opened and see if we can help.

Kyle

On Jun 19, 2012, at 9:32 AM, Gary Kotton wrote:

> Hi,
> I have just opened https://bugs.launchpad.net/quantum/+bug/1015148. I think that this may be a good way of getting involved. In my opinion it needs to be addressed with Quantum and the Quantum client - which gives a nice introduction.
> Thanks
> Gary
>
> On 06/19/2012 05:26 PM, Dan Wendlandt wrote:
>> Hi Kyle,
>>
>> Whenever I see a bug that I think is a good match, I try to tag it with low-hanging-fruit. I think I'll update the link on the wiki page to be the following, which limits the query to issues that have been confirmed as real bugs:
>>
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/quantum/+bugs?field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&field.status%3Alist=TRIAGED&field.status%3Alist=INPROGRESS&field.tag=low-hanging-fruit
>>
>> We've been pretty fortunate to have people pitching in and handling the low-hang-fruit issues, so there aren't a lot right now.
>>
>> I would call attention to a couple of the items on: http://wiki.openstack.org/QuantumStarterBugs
>>
>> Particularly, work on system testing (tempest or devstack) or helping Arvind with the Horizon + quantum integration. If you're looking for some more involved projects, I can probably give you some ideas as well. However, some of these projects are on the critical path for Folsom, so its up to you as to whether they would be a good match for the developer if they do not have a lot of experience working with Quantum.
>>
>> Dan
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Kyle Mestery (kmestery) <kmestery@cisco.com> wrote:
>> Quantum devs:
>>
>> Is this list of low hanging fruit bugs still accurate:
>>
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/quantum/+bugs?field.tag=low-hanging-fruit
>>
>> Looks like out of the 7 on this list, 5 have already been committed. Are there any new bugs that could be added to this list for new folks to work on?
>>
>> I have some new folks that will be looking to contribute to Quantum soon, looking to get them started with something easy to get their feet wet.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Kyle
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~netstack
>> Post to : netstack@lists.launchpad.net
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~netstack
>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> Dan Wendlandt
>> Nicira, Inc: www.nicira.com
>> twitter: danwendlandt
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>


--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~netstack
Post to : netstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~netstack
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp