https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3149
Ahmed Sayeed <ahmedsayeed1982@yahoo.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ahmedsayeed1982@yahoo.com
--- Comment #3 from Ahmed Sayeed <ahmedsayeed1982@yahoo.com> ---
"The strncat() function shall append not more than n bytes (a null byte
and bytes that follow it are not appended) from the array pointed to by
s2 to the end of the string pointed to by s1."
http://www-look-4.com/category/technology/
The wording imply that the third "n" argument is an additional boundary
limit, not the destination buffer capacity (ie. the destination buffer
is not implicitly SIZE_MAX),
https://komiya-dental.com/health/healthy-foods/ and both source and
destination do not overlap (overlapping depends on the source and
destination layout, not on the "n" value)
http://www.iu-bloomington.com/computers/invisible-with-vpn/
However, it seems that the optimized strncat version of the GLIBC
behaves incorrectly, when using this value.
https://waytowhatsnext.com/sports/navona/
"The strncat() function shall append not more than n bytes (a null byte
and bytes that follow it are not appended) from the array pointed to by
s2 to the end of the string pointed to by s1."
https://www.webb-dev.co.uk/sports/sports-and-health/
The wording imply that the third "n" argument is an additional boundary
limit, not the destination buffer capacity (ie. the destination buffer
is not implicitly SIZE_MAX), and both source and destination
http://www.wearelondonmade.com/category/tech/ do not overlap
(overlapping depends on the source and destination layout, not on the
"n" value)
However, it seems that the optimized strncat version of the GLIBC
behaves incorrectly, when using this value.
http://www.jopspeech.com/category/technology/
"The strncat() function shall append not more than n bytes (a null byte
and bytes that follow it are not appended) from the array pointed to by
s2 to the end of the string pointed to by s1."
http://joerg.li/category/technology/
The wording imply that the third "n" argument is an additional boundary
limit, not the destination buffer capacity (ie. the destination buffer
is not implicitly SIZE_MAX), and both source and destination do not
http://connstr.net/category/technology/ overlap (overlapping depends on
the source and destination layout, not on the "n" value)
However, it seems that the optimized strncat version of the GLIBC
behaves incorrectly, when using this value.
http://embermanchester.uk/category/technology/
"The strncat() function shall append not more than n bytes (a null byte
and bytes that follow it are not appended) from the array pointed to by
s2 to the end of the string pointed to by s1."
http://www.slipstone.co.uk/category/technology/
The wording imply that the third "n" argument is an additional boundary
limit, not the destination buffer capacity (ie. the destination buffer
is not implicitly SIZE_MAX), and both source and destination do not
overlap http://www.logoarts.co.uk/category/technology/ (overlapping
depends on the source and destination layout, not on the "n" value)
However, it seems that the optimized strncat version of the GLIBC
behaves incorrectly, when using this value.
http://www.acpirateradio.co.uk/category/technology/
"The strncat() function shall append not more than n bytes (a null byte
and bytes that follow it are not appended) from the array pointed to by
s2 to the end of the string pointed to by s1."
http://www.compilatori.com/category/technology/
The wording imply that the third "n" argument is an additional boundary
limit, not the destination buffer capacity (ie. the destination buffer
is not implicitly SIZE_MAX), and both source and destination do not
overlap (overlapping depends on the source and destination layout, not
on the "n" value)
However, it seems that the optimized strncat version of the GLIBC
behaves incorrectly, when using this value.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
_______________________________________________
openssh-bugs mailing list
openssh-bugs@mindrot.org
https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-bugs
Ahmed Sayeed <ahmedsayeed1982@yahoo.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ahmedsayeed1982@yahoo.com
--- Comment #3 from Ahmed Sayeed <ahmedsayeed1982@yahoo.com> ---
"The strncat() function shall append not more than n bytes (a null byte
and bytes that follow it are not appended) from the array pointed to by
s2 to the end of the string pointed to by s1."
http://www-look-4.com/category/technology/
The wording imply that the third "n" argument is an additional boundary
limit, not the destination buffer capacity (ie. the destination buffer
is not implicitly SIZE_MAX),
https://komiya-dental.com/health/healthy-foods/ and both source and
destination do not overlap (overlapping depends on the source and
destination layout, not on the "n" value)
http://www.iu-bloomington.com/computers/invisible-with-vpn/
However, it seems that the optimized strncat version of the GLIBC
behaves incorrectly, when using this value.
https://waytowhatsnext.com/sports/navona/
"The strncat() function shall append not more than n bytes (a null byte
and bytes that follow it are not appended) from the array pointed to by
s2 to the end of the string pointed to by s1."
https://www.webb-dev.co.uk/sports/sports-and-health/
The wording imply that the third "n" argument is an additional boundary
limit, not the destination buffer capacity (ie. the destination buffer
is not implicitly SIZE_MAX), and both source and destination
http://www.wearelondonmade.com/category/tech/ do not overlap
(overlapping depends on the source and destination layout, not on the
"n" value)
However, it seems that the optimized strncat version of the GLIBC
behaves incorrectly, when using this value.
http://www.jopspeech.com/category/technology/
"The strncat() function shall append not more than n bytes (a null byte
and bytes that follow it are not appended) from the array pointed to by
s2 to the end of the string pointed to by s1."
http://joerg.li/category/technology/
The wording imply that the third "n" argument is an additional boundary
limit, not the destination buffer capacity (ie. the destination buffer
is not implicitly SIZE_MAX), and both source and destination do not
http://connstr.net/category/technology/ overlap (overlapping depends on
the source and destination layout, not on the "n" value)
However, it seems that the optimized strncat version of the GLIBC
behaves incorrectly, when using this value.
http://embermanchester.uk/category/technology/
"The strncat() function shall append not more than n bytes (a null byte
and bytes that follow it are not appended) from the array pointed to by
s2 to the end of the string pointed to by s1."
http://www.slipstone.co.uk/category/technology/
The wording imply that the third "n" argument is an additional boundary
limit, not the destination buffer capacity (ie. the destination buffer
is not implicitly SIZE_MAX), and both source and destination do not
overlap http://www.logoarts.co.uk/category/technology/ (overlapping
depends on the source and destination layout, not on the "n" value)
However, it seems that the optimized strncat version of the GLIBC
behaves incorrectly, when using this value.
http://www.acpirateradio.co.uk/category/technology/
"The strncat() function shall append not more than n bytes (a null byte
and bytes that follow it are not appended) from the array pointed to by
s2 to the end of the string pointed to by s1."
http://www.compilatori.com/category/technology/
The wording imply that the third "n" argument is an additional boundary
limit, not the destination buffer capacity (ie. the destination buffer
is not implicitly SIZE_MAX), and both source and destination do not
overlap (overlapping depends on the source and destination layout, not
on the "n" value)
However, it seems that the optimized strncat version of the GLIBC
behaves incorrectly, when using this value.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
_______________________________________________
openssh-bugs mailing list
openssh-bugs@mindrot.org
https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-bugs