https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3205
Darren Tucker <dtucker@dtucker.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dtucker@dtucker.net
--- Comment #1 from Darren Tucker <dtucker@dtucker.net> ---
Our general policy is that we'll support something as long as someone
is willing to do the work, and that the changes involved don't
compromise support for modern platforms. It sounds like you're willing
to do the work, so the other question is how invasive the required
changes are.
Can you share the existing port or the diff against the stock code of
the same vintage? It doesn't have to be polished, I just want to get a
sense for what's involved.
> x86 (Big Endian)
I didn't know that was even possible.
> The compiler we have to use is c99
right now all of the code (with the exception of some of the
experimental post-quantum stuff not compiled by default) is c89 for
maximum portability so c99 is fine.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
_______________________________________________
openssh-bugs mailing list
openssh-bugs@mindrot.org
https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-bugs
Darren Tucker <dtucker@dtucker.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dtucker@dtucker.net
--- Comment #1 from Darren Tucker <dtucker@dtucker.net> ---
Our general policy is that we'll support something as long as someone
is willing to do the work, and that the changes involved don't
compromise support for modern platforms. It sounds like you're willing
to do the work, so the other question is how invasive the required
changes are.
Can you share the existing port or the diff against the stock code of
the same vintage? It doesn't have to be polished, I just want to get a
sense for what's involved.
> x86 (Big Endian)
I didn't know that was even possible.
> The compiler we have to use is c99
right now all of the code (with the exception of some of the
experimental post-quantum stuff not compiled by default) is c89 for
maximum portability so c99 is fine.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
_______________________________________________
openssh-bugs mailing list
openssh-bugs@mindrot.org
https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-bugs