Mailing List Archive

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=581

from-bugzilla@geek-central.gen.nz changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|WONTFIX |



------- Additional Comments From from-bugzilla@geek-central.gen.nz 2003-08-27 10:49 -------
If you are claiming to offer "portable" code, then it is not really acceptable
to use certain vendors' implementations as having definitive semantics,
and others as not. You should go by the specification. And if the
specification is unclear, you should not rely on that behaviour.



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=581

djm@mindrot.org changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID



------- Additional Comments From djm@mindrot.org 2003-08-27 11:20 -------
You have not provided one iota of evidence that this behaviour is not an OS bug.
Given that a single platform is the only one exhibiting the problem, and then
only for one specific file system, then it is almost certainly an OS bug.

I'm willing be be convinced otherwise but, as I mentioned two months ago, the
onus is on you to provide evidence. Please don't reopen the bug unless you are
willing to do so.



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=581

from-bugzilla@geek-central.gen.nz changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID |



------- Additional Comments From from-bugzilla@geek-central.gen.nz 2003-08-27 11:29 -------
>You have not provided one iota of evidence that this behaviour is
>not an OS bug.

We have given you the specification. Is that not the right specification? Is
there some more official specification somewhere else that we're not
aware of?

You have not provided one iota of evidence that the Tru64/NFS behaviour
is contrary to the specification. Your code does not work correctly with this
behaviour. Therefore it is your code that has the bug.



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=581

djm@mindrot.org changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX





------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.