Mailing List Archive: [Bug 628] Review usage of mysignal() vs signal()

[Bug 628] Review usage of mysignal() vs signal()

Aug 23, 2003, 4:44 PM

Post #1 of 3 (630 views)

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=628

Summary: Review usage of mysignal() vs signal()
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 3.6.1p2
Platform: All
OS/Version: OpenBSD
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Miscellaneous
AssignedTo: openssh-bugs@mindrot.org
ReportedBy: djm@mindrot.org

We don't use our mysignal() wrapper consistently. Review this.

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

[Bug 628] Review usage of mysignal() vs signal() [ In reply to ]

bugzilla-daemon at mindrot

Aug 23, 2003, 4:47 PM

Post #2 of 3 (618 views)

Permalink

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=628

djm@mindrot.org changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO| |627
nThis| |

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

[Bug 628] Review usage of mysignal() vs signal() [ In reply to ]

bugzilla-daemon at mindrot

Aug 25, 2003, 4:53 PM

Post #3 of 3 (617 views)

Permalink

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=628

djm@mindrot.org changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED

------- Additional Comments From djm@mindrot.org 2003-08-26 10:53 -------
Ben has committed something for this. We can open a different bug if it breaks
something.

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.