Mailing List Archive: PTX 10003 and Junos EVO

PTX 10003 and Junos EVO

Sep 25, 2019, 3:45 PM

Post #1 of 3 (628 views)

Hi All,

Can anybody share experiences with PTX 10003 and Junos EVO? Specifically
looking to use it in MPLS/RSVP-TE LSR/LER role. It will also have have
~20-30 BGP peerings with 10-20 BGP full routing tables from transit peers.

The hardware of the box looks very nice, but going to Junos EVO 19.x
seems risky, based on past experiences of running fresh Junos.

Thanks,

_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: PTX 10003 and Junos EVO [ In reply to ]

jared at puck

Sep 25, 2019, 3:47 PM

Post #2 of 3 (628 views)

Permalink

Did you already get the 10003? I have experience with the 72q/60c but not the 80/160 yet (I think it’s in the lab now).

- Jared

> On Sep 25, 2019, at 6:45 PM, Anton Yurchenko <ayurchenko@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Can anybody share experiences with PTX 10003 and Junos EVO? Specifically looking to use it in MPLS/RSVP-TE LSR/LER role. It will also have have ~20-30 BGP peerings with 10-20 BGP full routing tables from transit peers.
>
> The hardware of the box looks very nice, but going to Junos EVO 19.x seems risky, based on past experiences of running fresh Junos.
>
> Thanks,
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: PTX 10003 and Junos EVO [ In reply to ]

ayurchenko at gmail

Sep 25, 2019, 5:01 PM

Post #3 of 3 (627 views)

Permalink

Looking at it as a possible replacement for 10008 chassis in new
deployments, 10003-60 or 180 would both be a good fit depending
site/density.

Have not ordered it, will have demo unit to play soon.

But even after testing/POC, running cutting edge Junos is risky. Asking
here, maybe Junos EVO is actually much better then I expected.

On 9/25/19 3:47 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
> Did you already get the 10003? I have experience with the 72q/60c but not the 80/160 yet (I think it’s in the lab now).
>
> - Jared
>
>> On Sep 25, 2019, at 6:45 PM, Anton Yurchenko <ayurchenko@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Can anybody share experiences with PTX 10003 and Junos EVO? Specifically looking to use it in MPLS/RSVP-TE LSR/LER role. It will also have have ~20-30 BGP peerings with 10-20 BGP full routing tables from transit peers.
>>
>> The hardware of the box looks very nice, but going to Junos EVO 19.x seems risky, based on past experiences of running fresh Junos.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp