Mailing List Archive

Hi Jörg

Completely agree with you.
When I find the time I will try to convince via TAC case for a feature request.

There are other inconsistent commands as well, e.g.:
you can do a "show ip prefix-list" but cannot do a "show route-map” instead have to do a show run route-map XYZ (which won’t work btw, if the route-map name is too long)

In my experience it is more promising if you try it directly via TAC instead of contacting your local account manger…
If you open a case regarding this, let me know, so I can back it up with a case from our side as well.

Kind regards,
Lino

Lino Moragon
Init7 / AS13030


> On 17 Nov 2020, at 15:22, Jörg Kost <jk@ip-clear.de> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> maybe we all can push for a feature request / or somebody knows the right person to pitch for a
>
> show interface ve $X
>
> - command?
>
> It feels odd to have this on any other Netiron machine but not on the SLX.
>
> My current workaround:
> alias "showve" "show interface | begin ^Ve"
>
> Regards
> Jörg
> _______________________________________________
> foundry-nsp mailing list
> foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp

I am also beginning to dislike that from 20.2 (bare metal version), the
router / switch begins to listen to more funny ports by default.

Nothing against installing a receiving ACL, but I would prefer the
switch safer out of the box.

tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:830 0.0.0.0:*
LISTEN 7139/sshd
tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:514 0.0.0.0:*
LISTEN 2100/xinetd
tcp 0 0 X.X.X.X:646 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
4235/mplsd
tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:111 0.0.0.0:*
LISTEN 1994/portmap
tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:22 0.0.0.0:*
LISTEN 7139/sshd
tcp6 0 0 :::9339 :::*
LISTEN 4220/gnmi_server
tcp6 0 0 :::8765 :::*
LISTEN 4219/ds_service
tcp6 0 0 :::830 :::*
LISTEN 7139/sshd
tcp6 0 0 :::9999 :::*
LISTEN 4220/gnmi_server
tcp6 0 0 :::111 :::*
LISTEN 2026/rpcbind
tcp6 0 0 :::80 :::*
LISTEN 2958/httpd.0
tcp6 0 0 :::22 :::*
LISTEN 7139/sshd
tcp6 0 0 :::23 :::*
LISTEN 2100/xinetd


On 23 Nov 2020, at 18:09, Lino Moragon wrote:

> Hi Jörg
>
> Completely agree with you.
> When I find the time I will try to convince via TAC case for a feature
> request.
>
> There are other inconsistent commands as well, e.g.:
> you can do a "show ip prefix-list" but cannot do a "show route-map”
> instead have to do a show run route-map XYZ (which won’t work btw,
> if the route-map name is too long)
>
> In my experience it is more promising if you try it directly via TAC
> instead of contacting your local account manger…
> If you open a case regarding this, let me know, so I can back it up
> with a case from our side as well.
>
> Kind regards,
> Lino
>
> Lino Moragon
> Init7 / AS13030
>
>
>> On 17 Nov 2020, at 15:22, Jörg Kost <jk@ip-clear.de> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> maybe we all can push for a feature request / or somebody knows the
>> right person to pitch for a
>>
>> show interface ve $X
>>
>> - command?
>>
>> It feels odd to have this on any other Netiron machine but not on the
>> SLX.
>>
>> My current workaround:
>> alias "showve" "show interface | begin ^Ve"
>>
>> Regards
>> Jörg
>> _______________________________________________
>> foundry-nsp mailing list
>> foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net
>> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
_______________________________________________
foundry-nsp mailing list
foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net
http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp