Mailing List Archive: SLX 9540?

SLX 9540?

Jan 16, 2018, 12:38 AM

Post #1 of 5 (1586 views)

Hello there,

is somebody already using the SLX 9540 in real world scenarios and might
want to hand out some feedback? I am "thinking" about this device right
now.

Regards
Jörg
_______________________________________________
foundry-nsp mailing list
foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net
http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp

Re: SLX 9540? [ In reply to ]

robhass at gmail

Feb 21, 2018, 2:56 PM

Post #2 of 5 (1562 views)

Permalink

Avoid it. Buggy, Full-Table (1M FIB) in beta. TAC after migration to
Extreme is way worst than earlier.

We have many issues, not resolved for 14-16 months. TAC is unable to find
root causes as parts of software not writing any debug information. They
don't want to turn in on due to performance problems.

Currently switching to Arista, as got too many problems and unresolved
issues.

Rob

Re: SLX 9540? [ In reply to ]

daniel.schmidt at wyo

Feb 23, 2018, 8:13 AM

Post #3 of 5 (1560 views)

Permalink

'TAC after migration to Extreme is way worst than earlier.' I have to
concur.

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 3:56 PM, Robert Hass <robhass@gmail.com> wrote:

> Avoid it. Buggy, Full-Table (1M FIB) in beta. TAC after migration to
> Extreme is way worst than earlier.
>
> We have many issues, not resolved for 14-16 months. TAC is unable to find
> root causes as parts of software not writing any debug information. They
> don't want to turn in on due to performance problems.
>
> Currently switching to Arista, as got too many problems and unresolved
> issues.
>
> Rob
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundry-nsp mailing list
> foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
>

--

E-Mail to and from me, in connection with the transaction
of public business, is subject to the Wyoming Public Records
Act and may be disclosed to third parties.

Re: SLX 9540? [ In reply to ]

jk at ip-clear

Feb 26, 2018, 2:11 PM

Post #4 of 5 (1556 views)

Permalink

They are still a little bit unsorted, aren't they? Also the sync from
my.brocade.com had some issues, for example our account was not migrated
and they needed lot of time to repair this one. I also run a board on
NetIron 06.2.00a, which I even can't find on the new Extreme Portal :-)

So heads up for more improvement.

On 23 Feb 2018, at 17:13, Daniel Schmidt wrote:

> 'TAC after migration to Extreme is way worst than earlier.' I have
> to
> concur.
>
_______________________________________________
foundry-nsp mailing list
foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net
http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp

Re: SLX 9540? [ In reply to ]

jk at ip-clear

Feb 28, 2018, 3:34 AM

Post #5 of 5 (1554 views)

Permalink

Hi,

do you want to share some details about the feature set, that you found
to be buggy? Or is it more on a general case?

Jörg

On 21 Feb 2018, at 23:56, Robert Hass wrote:

> Avoid it. Buggy, Full-Table (1M FIB) in beta. TAC after migration to
> Extreme is way worst than earlier.
>
> We have many issues, not resolved for 14-16 months. TAC is unable to
> find
> root causes as parts of software not writing any debug information.
> They
> don't want to turn in on due to performance problems.
_______________________________________________
foundry-nsp mailing list
foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net
http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp