Mailing List Archive

Hey,

thanks for the heads-up – what about ADP? Would that work in this combination or are ADP and snaplock mutually exclusive?

Best,

Alexander Griesser
Head of Systems Operations

ANEXIA Internetdienstleistungs GmbH

E-Mail: AGriesser@anexia-it.com<mailto:AGriesser@anexia-it.com>
Web: http://www.anexia-it.com<http://www.anexia-it.com/>

Anschrift Hauptsitz Klagenfurt: Feldkirchnerstraße 140, 9020 Klagenfurt
Geschäftsführer: Alexander Windbichler
Firmenbuch: FN 289918a | Gerichtsstand: Klagenfurt | UID-Nummer: AT U63216601

Von: toasters-bounces@teaparty.net <toasters-bounces@teaparty.net> Im Auftrag von Basil
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 22. August 2018 13:39
An: toasters@teaparty.net
Betreff: Be careful about snaplock

Just going through an experience I figured I would share with the list: we ordered a small Snaplock cluster, sized so that all disks would be used for the Snaplock aggregate. Well, as it turns out, you must always size enough disk for one regular aggregate: SVM root volumes are not supported on root aggregates nor on Snaplock aggregates.

That actually worked like a charm. But I had to use three of the data
partitions of the ADP drives for a regular aggregate in order to make the
SVM root.

On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 7:44 AM Alexander Griesser <AGriesser@anexia-it.com>
wrote:

> Hey,
>
>
>
> thanks for the heads-up – what about ADP? Would that work in this
> combination or are ADP and snaplock mutually exclusive?
>
>
>
> Best,
>
>
>
> *Alexander Griesser*
>
> Head of Systems Operations
>
>
>
> ANEXIA Internetdienstleistungs GmbH
>
>
>
> E-Mail: AGriesser@anexia-it.com
>
> Web: http://www.anexia-it.com
>
>
>
> Anschrift Hauptsitz Klagenfurt: Feldkirchnerstraße 140, 9020 Klagenfurt
> <https://maps.google.com/?q=Klagenfurt:+Feldkirchnerstra%C3%9Fe+140,+9020+Klagenfurt&entry=gmail&source=g>
>
> Geschäftsführer: Alexander Windbichler
>
> Firmenbuch: FN 289918a | Gerichtsstand: Klagenfurt | UID-Nummer: AT
> U63216601
>
>
>
> *Von:* toasters-bounces@teaparty.net <toasters-bounces@teaparty.net> *Im
> Auftrag von *Basil
> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 22. August 2018 13:39
> *An:* toasters@teaparty.net
> *Betreff:* Be careful about snaplock
>
>
>
> Just going through an experience I figured I would share with the list: we
> ordered a small Snaplock cluster, sized so that all disks would be used for
> the Snaplock aggregate. Well, as it turns out, you must always size enough
> disk for one regular aggregate: SVM root volumes are not supported on root
> aggregates nor on Snaplock aggregates.
>