Mailing List Archive

Verizon NJ <-> Hetzner DE, routes via LA?
Since yesterday, I've started to see an increase in latency between my
self in NJ on Verizon FIOS and Hetzner in DE. Even using Verizon:s
looking glass is giving me 250ms. This is an increase of about 150ms
(Seems to be true for most of the US East Coast)
A traceroute seems to tell me that the traffic is routed via LA, which
could explain the increase in latency.

Traceroute from Verizon looking glass page, sourcing Newark
https://www.verizon.com/business/why-verizon/looking-glass/

traceroute to 144.76.94.10 (144.76.94.10), 30 hops max, 52 byte packets
1 0.et-10-3-0.GW7.LAX15.ALTER.NET (140.222.235.147) 61.052 ms 61.522
ms 61.063 ms
2 152.179.21.22 (152.179.21.22) 158.708 ms 158.683 ms 158.681 ms
3 * * pd900ccde.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (217.0.204.222) 263.187 ms
4 62.157.248.138 (62.157.248.138) 249.071 ms 248.570 ms 248.737 ms
5 * * *
6 ex9k2.dc10.fsn1.hetzner.com (213.239.229.62) 250.333 ms 252.488 ms
250.232 ms


Does anyone have any more insight? (Verizon status pages says everything
is fine, ofc)
Re: Verizon NJ <-> Hetzner DE, routes via LA? [ In reply to ]
<peanut gallery>

On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 2:29 PM Tomas Jonsson <tomas@jonsson.io> wrote:

> Since yesterday, I've started to see an increase in latency between my
> self in NJ on Verizon FIOS and Hetzner in DE. Even using Verizon:s
> looking glass is giving me 250ms. This is an increase of about 150ms
> (Seems to be true for most of the US East Coast)
> A traceroute seems to tell me that the traffic is routed via LA, which
> could explain the increase in latency.
>
> Traceroute from Verizon looking glass page, sourcing Newark
> https://www.verizon.com/business/why-verizon/looking-glass/
>
> traceroute to 144.76.94.10 (144.76.94.10), 30 hops max, 52 byte packets
> 1 0.et-10-3-0.GW7.LAX15.ALTER.NET (140.222.235.147) 61.052 ms 61.522
> ms 61.063 ms
> 2 152.179.21.22 (152.179.21.22) 158.708 ms 158.683 ms 158.681 ms
> 3 * * pd900ccde.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (217.0.204.222) 263.187 ms
>

that's odd to see, I had thought DTAG was a peer of 701 at some point.
maybe that's an incorrect 15 yr old memory :( (or maybe things changed!)

it happens that from IAD area ... same path via LAX :(
It also seems strange that 3320 would ONLY appear in LAX... maybe their
east-coast
landings are feeling under the weather?

4 62.157.248.138 (62.157.248.138) 249.071 ms 248.570 ms 248.737 ms
> 5 * * *
> 6 ex9k2.dc10.fsn1.hetzner.com (213.239.229.62) 250.333 ms 252.488 ms
> 250.232 ms
>
>
> Does anyone have any more insight? (Verizon status pages says everything
> is fine, ofc)
>

the link you see above is a customer link ,so.. sure, everything for VZ is
fine :)
their customer though MAY be having a sad day.