Mailing List Archive

Salesforce issues
We are receiving latency complaints to Salesforce, anyone else seeing this?

Looks like Vocus Network might be possibly leaking some force.com (Salesforce) routes, causing 200ms of latency. Traffic is going Chicago -> Vocus Networks -> Australia -> Akamai Atlanta

I have emailed both Vocus Networks and Akamai about this.


dig force.com +short
104.109.10.129 <<< Possible Leaked via Vocus Networks
104.109.11.129 <<< Possible Leaked via Vocus Networks
184.25.179.132 <<< Possible Leaked via Vocus Networks
184.31.3.130 <<<<< Route ok (NTT, TATA, Akamai) 25ms
184.31.10.133 <<< Route ok (NTT, Akamai) 16ms
23.1.35.132 <<< Possible Leaked via Vocus Networks
23.1.99.130 <<< Route ok (Akamai) 15 ms
23.1.106.133 <<< Route ok (NTT, Akamai) 16ms


2021-11-24T13:47:59-0600
Keys: Help Display mode Restart statistics Order of fields quit
Packets Pings
Host Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
1. AS??? 172.19.1.2 (172.19.1.2) 0.0% 7 1.7 1.9 0.9 4.8 1.3
2. ???
3. AS53828 207.200.193.193 (207.200.193.193) 0.0% 6 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.0 0.1
4. AS??? eqix-ch1.vocusconnect.com (208.115.136.142) 0.0% 6 41.0 40.8 40.8 41.0 0.1
5. AS4826 be101.bdr04.sjc01.ca.us.vocus.network (114.31.199.38) 40.0% 6 200.6 200.7 200.6 200.8 0.1
[MPLS: Lbl 24266 Exp 0 S 1 TTL 1]
6. AS4826 be100.bdr03.sjc01.ca.us.vocus.network (114.31.199.32) 0.0% 6 197.4 197.5 197.4 197.5 0.0
[MPLS: Lbl 24807 Exp 0 S 1 TTL 1]
7. AS4826 be202.cor02.syd04.nsw.vocus.network (114.31.199.42) 0.0% 6 197.4 197.4 197.3 197.5 0.1
[MPLS: Lbl 24932 Exp 0 S 1 TTL 1]
8. AS4826 be100.bdr04.syd03.nsw.vocus.network (114.31.192.45) 0.0% 6 197.5 197.5 197.4 197.5 0.0
9. AS4826 static-74.173.255.49.in-addr.VOCUS.net.au (49.255.173.74) 0.0% 6 200.2 200.7 197.4 205.2 3.0
10. AS20940 a23-1-240-228.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com (23.1.240.228) 0.0% 6 197.1 197.3 197.1 197.6 0.2
11. ???
12. AS4826 static-73.173.255.49.in-addr.VOCUS.net.au (49.255.173.73) 0.0% 6 197.5 197.6 197.5 197.8 0.1
13. AS4826 be114.cor02.syd04.nsw.vocus.network (114.31.192.44) 0.0% 6 348.7 349.0 348.7 349.4 0.3
14. AS4826 be202.bdr03.sjc01.ca.us.vocus.network (114.31.199.43) 0.0% 6 349.0 349.1 348.9 349.3 0.1
15. AS3257 173.205.35.1 (173.205.35.1) 0.0% 6 348.8 351.0 348.6 362.1 5.4
16. AS3257 ae18-3416.cr11-fra2.ip4.gtt.net (89.149.180.134) 0.0% 6 356.0 350.5 349.1 356.0 2.7
17. AS3257 ip4.gtt.net (98.124.180.42) 0.0% 6 348.9 349.0 348.9 349.2 0.1
18. AS20940 ae12.r01.sjc01.icn.netarch.akamai.com (23.207.232.36) 0.0% 6 368.5 353.4 349.3 368.5 8.4
19. AS20940 ae11.r01.ord01.icn.netarch.akamai.com (23.32.63.46) 0.0% 6 393.7 393.8 393.7 394.1 0.2
20. AS20940 ae6.r02.iad01.icn.netarch.akamai.com (23.32.63.21) 0.0% 6 411.4 411.8 411.4 412.4 0.5
21. AS20940 ae2.r12.iad01.ien.netarch.akamai.com (23.203.152.41) 0.0% 6 411.9 415.1 411.9 417.4 2.9
AS20940 ae2.r11.iad01.ien.netarch.akamai.com (23.203.152.39)
22. ???
23. AS33905 a184-25-179-132.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com (184.25.179.132) 0.0% 6 215.9 216.4 215.9 216.7 0.3





Erik Sundberg
Sr. Network Engineer

office 773.661.5532
mobile 708.710.7419
noc 866.892.0915

esundberg@nitelusa.com<mailto:esundberg@nitelusa.com>

888.450.2100
350 N Orleans St. #1300N
Chicago, IL 60654
nitelusa.com<http://www.nitelusa.com/>
[cid:image006.png@01D7E13A.E1A0E610]<http://www.nitelusa.com/>

Smarter technology made simple



________________________________

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail transmission, and any documents, files or previous e-mail messages attached to it may contain confidential information that is legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you have received this transmission in error please notify the sender immediately by replying to this e-mail. You must destroy the original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving in any manner.
Thank you.
Re: Salesforce issues [ In reply to ]
* ESundberg@nitelusa.com (Erik Sundberg) [Wed 24 Nov 2021, 20:57 CET]:
>We are receiving latency complaints to Salesforce, anyone else seeing this?
>
[...]
>dig force.com +short

force.com sends an immediate HTTP redirect to www.force.com. You should
look up that hostname instead, and ideally you should have Salesforce
customers file tickets with Salesforce, since they're in the best
position to debug their web app that undoubtedly pulls in content from
many different hostnames.


-- Niels.