Mailing List Archive

Hi Chad! I'll follow up on this with you directly.

Ryan @ Fastly

On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 8:16 AM Chad Sorrell <csorrell@intelligentfiber.com>
wrote:

> Anyone have a contact at Fastly they could send me offline? I’ve been
> trying to get something established since March and I haven’t heard
> anything at all. I’m concerned maybe my email isn’t reaching anyone.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> --
>
> Chad Sorrell
>
> Network Architect
>
> Intelligent Fiber Network
>
>
>

https://twitter.com/ryan505/status/1196499414443077638

^^ For anyone who's needing urgency, feel free to reach out to me directly.
We're working on some automation on this front, but in the meantime...

On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 8:19 AM Ryan Landry <ryan.landry@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Chad! I'll follow up on this with you directly.
>
> Ryan @ Fastly
>
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 8:16 AM Chad Sorrell <
> csorrell@intelligentfiber.com> wrote:
>
>> Anyone have a contact at Fastly they could send me offline? I’ve been
>> trying to get something established since March and I haven’t heard
>> anything at all. I’m concerned maybe my email isn’t reaching anyone.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Chad Sorrell
>>
>> Network Architect
>>
>> Intelligent Fiber Network
>>
>>
>>
>

Hi Dustin, others,

Sure thing! Someone from the Fastly peering team will follow up with you
off-list.

Information about peering with Fastly: https://www.peeringdb.com/asn/54113
and https://www.fastly.com/peering/

Kind regards,

Job

On Fri, 30 Sep 2022 at 14:39, Dustin Brooks <dbrooks@conterra.com> wrote:

> Can someone from Fastly reach out to me about peering.
>
>
>
> --
>
> *Dustin Brooks*
>
> *Sr. Network Engineer*
>
>
>
> [image: signature_4080889297]
>
>
>
> 2028 Highway 115,
> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/2028+Highway+115,+Mansura,+LA+71350?entry=gmail&source=g>
> Mansura, LA 71350
> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/2028+Highway+115,+Mansura,+LA+71350?entry=gmail&source=g>
>
> 318.597.0303 Office | 337.781.4506 Mobile | www.Conterra.com
> <http://www.conterra.com/>
>
>
> This e-mail may contain information that is confidential or privileged. If
> you are not the intended recipient, do not read, copy or distribute the
> e-mail or any attachments. Instead, please notify the sender and delete the
> e-mail and any attachments. Thank you.
>

Hi Peter,

Sorry you didn't get a response.

I only just started at Fastly, but I can look / nudge the right person if you drop me an e-mail off-list with details.

Ian


On Tue, 5 Dec 2023, at 9:14 PM, Peter Potvin via NANOG wrote:
> Looking for someone on the Fastly peering team to reach out regarding peering on a couple mutual IXPs - sent an email to the peering contact as listed on PeeringDB and never heard back, and also have a few colleagues who have experienced the same issue.

Me too. Fastly has been promising me peering every year for the past five years.

They are just a few cabinets over, so it has been pretty frustrating.

Tom

Sent from my iPad

> On Dec 5, 2023, at 1:25?PM, Ian Chilton <ian@ichilton.co.uk> wrote:
>
> ?
> Hi Peter,
>
> Sorry you didn't get a response.
>
> I only just started at Fastly, but I can look / nudge the right person if you drop me an e-mail off-list with details.
>
> Ian
>
>
>> On Tue, 5 Dec 2023, at 9:14 PM, Peter Potvin via NANOG wrote:
>> Looking for someone on the Fastly peering team to reach out regarding peering on a couple mutual IXPs - sent an email to the peering contact as listed on PeeringDB and never heard back, and also have a few colleagues who have experienced the same issue.
>

We have sent them some inquiries in markets we are with no reply. Just figured they weren’t interested.




Justin Wilson
j2sw@mtin.net
justin@fd-ix.com
Https://www.fdi-ix.com

> On Dec 5, 2023, at 4:14?PM, Peter Potvin via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> wrote:
>
> Looking for someone on the Fastly peering team to reach out regarding peering on a couple mutual IXPs - sent an email to the peering contact as listed on PeeringDB and never heard back, and also have a few colleagues who have experienced the same issue.
>
> Regards,
> Peter Potvin | Executive Director
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Accuris Technologies Ltd.
>

The PeeringDB contact info was very useful for us. Granted, we were pulling a substantial amount from them over transit, over 20gb at peak, so they have a huge incentive to peer with us. ????

On Dec 6, 2023, at 12:31, Justin Wilson (Lists) <lists@mtin.net> wrote:

?
We have sent them some inquiries in markets we are with no reply. Just figured they weren’t interested.




Justin Wilson
j2sw@mtin.net
justin@fd-ix.com
Https://www.fdi-ix.com

On Dec 5, 2023, at 4:14?PM, Peter Potvin via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> wrote:

Looking for someone on the Fastly peering team to reach out regarding peering on a couple mutual IXPs - sent an email to the peering contact as listed on PeeringDB and never heard back, and also have a few colleagues who have experienced the same issue.

Regards,
Peter Potvin | Executive Director
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accuris Technologies Ltd.

Hi folks - former Fastly VP here.

I've flagged this thread to my past colleagues who may not be on the list.
Generally speaking, most routes from AS54113 were always available on any
given IXP route-servers. Some additional anycast routes can be announced
selectively via communities. Respecting the selective peering policy -
bi-lats are provided for somewhat bigger traffic peers, and then of course
PNI's for the really big stuff. Some of this depends on serving capacity at
any given POP.

Certainly, "big" is subjective, as is "worth it". Nevertheless, there was
(and I'm sure still is) mutual performance and cost incentive to peer
everywhere that it makes sense, and where technically feasible to do so.

Hope you all get a reply in short order.

Cheers,
Ryan

Disclaimer: things may have changed - my message here is not authoritative
on current policy posture. I am not replying on Fastly's behalf.

On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 10:59?PM Tim Burke <tim@mid.net> wrote:

> The PeeringDB contact info was very useful for us. Granted, we were
> pulling a substantial amount from them over transit, over 20gb at peak, so
> they have a huge incentive to peer with us. ????
>
> On Dec 6, 2023, at 12:31, Justin Wilson (Lists) <lists@mtin.net> wrote:
>
> ?
> We have sent them some inquiries in markets we are with no reply. Just
> figured they weren’t interested.
>
>
>
>
> Justin Wilson
> j2sw@mtin.net
> justin@fd-ix.com
> Https://www.fdi-ix.com
>
> On Dec 5, 2023, at 4:14?PM, Peter Potvin via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
> wrote:
>
> Looking for someone on the Fastly peering team to reach out regarding
> peering on a couple mutual IXPs - sent an email to the peering contact as
> listed on PeeringDB and never heard back, and also have a few colleagues
> who have experienced the same issue.
>
> Regards,
> Peter Potvin | Executive Director
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *Accuris Technologies Ltd.*
>
>
>