On 3/10/22 09:24, Stuart Auchterlonie wrote:
> On 10/03/2022 08:21, Piotr Oniszczuk wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Wiadomo?? napisana przez Peter Bennett <pb.mythtv@gmail.com> w dniu
>>> 09.03.2022, o godz. 23:49:
>>>
>>> We can try the latest QT and see if that helps. I don't know the
>>> status of getting QT6 to work with MythTV. What is involved in
>>> building with QT6 ? Do we just update the download location?
>>
>> David done fantastic work with Qt6: it works perfectly fine for me.
>>
>> In fact only thing holding me to switch to Qt6 at production is lack
>> of QTWebKit answer
>> (so after switching to Qt6 user will loose functionality - this is
>> nogo for me for Qt6 currently)
>
> Somebody just needs to step up and write a replacement for all the
> QtWebKit code, which is now obsolete with Qt6
>
> any takers?
>
> Regards
> Stuart
> _______________________________________________
>
I am a taker. My Initial plan is:
1. Find out what all in MythTV and plugins use QtWebKit.
2. Test all the features that use it and make sure they work..
3. Port from QtWebKit to QtWebEngine
4. Test all the features that use it and make sure they work..
Does anybody have issues with using QtWebEngine as the replacement?
Peter
_______________________________________________
mythtv-dev mailing list
mythtv-dev@mythtv.org
http://lists.mythtv.org/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev
http://wiki.mythtv.org/Mailing_List_etiquette
MythTV Forums: https://forum.mythtv.org
> On 10/03/2022 08:21, Piotr Oniszczuk wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Wiadomo?? napisana przez Peter Bennett <pb.mythtv@gmail.com> w dniu
>>> 09.03.2022, o godz. 23:49:
>>>
>>> We can try the latest QT and see if that helps. I don't know the
>>> status of getting QT6 to work with MythTV. What is involved in
>>> building with QT6 ? Do we just update the download location?
>>
>> David done fantastic work with Qt6: it works perfectly fine for me.
>>
>> In fact only thing holding me to switch to Qt6 at production is lack
>> of QTWebKit answer
>> (so after switching to Qt6 user will loose functionality - this is
>> nogo for me for Qt6 currently)
>
> Somebody just needs to step up and write a replacement for all the
> QtWebKit code, which is now obsolete with Qt6
>
> any takers?
>
> Regards
> Stuart
> _______________________________________________
>
I am a taker. My Initial plan is:
1. Find out what all in MythTV and plugins use QtWebKit.
2. Test all the features that use it and make sure they work..
3. Port from QtWebKit to QtWebEngine
4. Test all the features that use it and make sure they work..
Does anybody have issues with using QtWebEngine as the replacement?
Peter
_______________________________________________
mythtv-dev mailing list
mythtv-dev@mythtv.org
http://lists.mythtv.org/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev
http://wiki.mythtv.org/Mailing_List_etiquette
MythTV Forums: https://forum.mythtv.org