I have skimmed a few of the bugs on
the latest Coverity scan, and noticed
that some of the issues are false
positives (in particular, there are some
reported resource leaks that are due
to Coverity not understanding the
deleteLater constructs, which cppcheck
also does not understand).
Is it acceptable to the developers if
I choose to mark those issues as
appropriate in the defect list in order
to make the report a bit more useful,
or should I leave it to the devs to
make those determinations and
changes and open a ticket in MythTV
trac for any such proposed changes?
_______________________________________________
mythtv-dev mailing list
mythtv-dev@mythtv.org
http://lists.mythtv.org/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev
http://wiki.mythtv.org/Mailing_List_etiquette
MythTV Forums: https://forum.mythtv.org
the latest Coverity scan, and noticed
that some of the issues are false
positives (in particular, there are some
reported resource leaks that are due
to Coverity not understanding the
deleteLater constructs, which cppcheck
also does not understand).
Is it acceptable to the developers if
I choose to mark those issues as
appropriate in the defect list in order
to make the report a bit more useful,
or should I leave it to the devs to
make those determinations and
changes and open a ticket in MythTV
trac for any such proposed changes?
_______________________________________________
mythtv-dev mailing list
mythtv-dev@mythtv.org
http://lists.mythtv.org/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev
http://wiki.mythtv.org/Mailing_List_etiquette
MythTV Forums: https://forum.mythtv.org