>Perrin Harkins wrote:
>> On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 14:20 -0400, Stas Bekman wrote:
>>
>>>Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
>>>
>>>>Perrin Harkins wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Are you talking about separate pools of interpreters perl vhost? Is
>>>>>that really working?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I donn't think is works yet as this need will use the perlchild MPM which
>>>>isn't finished and isn't currently being actively developed by httpd.
>>>
>>>Not quite. It does "work" even with the prefork mpm. But there are issues.
>>
>>
>> If I say something like "Improved isolation of servers for easier use in
>> ISPs" is that overstating it? My concern is that an ISP would ask us
>> about this after seeing the release and we'd look foolish saying, "well,
>> it doesn't really work well enough to use yet."
>Separate pools of interpreters per vhost work, but it has no relation to
>the ISPs whose problem is a secure separation between users. But perchild
>(and its equivalents) aren't there yet, though it has nothing to do with
>mod_perl (it's on the apache playground). Though I've heard that metux
>mpm[1] is used by some people in production. I haven't tried it, so I
>can't tell if it works under mod_perl.
>[1] http://www.metux.de/mpm/en/?patpage=
There's also Peruser MPM http://www.telana.com/peruser.php
It's an alpha, but the development going on. Peruser seems to be more
suitable for MP2 than Metux, because it uses precesses instead of threads.
That's all I know. I haven't tested it yet.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
http://izbori2005.netinfo.bg - Èçáîðè 2005 - Ñàìî íàé-âàæíîòî. Âèæ, ÷óé, ïðî÷åòè è èçáåðè!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: advocacy-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: advocacy-help@perl.apache.org
>> On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 14:20 -0400, Stas Bekman wrote:
>>
>>>Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
>>>
>>>>Perrin Harkins wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Are you talking about separate pools of interpreters perl vhost? Is
>>>>>that really working?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I donn't think is works yet as this need will use the perlchild MPM which
>>>>isn't finished and isn't currently being actively developed by httpd.
>>>
>>>Not quite. It does "work" even with the prefork mpm. But there are issues.
>>
>>
>> If I say something like "Improved isolation of servers for easier use in
>> ISPs" is that overstating it? My concern is that an ISP would ask us
>> about this after seeing the release and we'd look foolish saying, "well,
>> it doesn't really work well enough to use yet."
>Separate pools of interpreters per vhost work, but it has no relation to
>the ISPs whose problem is a secure separation between users. But perchild
>(and its equivalents) aren't there yet, though it has nothing to do with
>mod_perl (it's on the apache playground). Though I've heard that metux
>mpm[1] is used by some people in production. I haven't tried it, so I
>can't tell if it works under mod_perl.
>[1] http://www.metux.de/mpm/en/?patpage=
There's also Peruser MPM http://www.telana.com/peruser.php
It's an alpha, but the development going on. Peruser seems to be more
suitable for MP2 than Metux, because it uses precesses instead of threads.
That's all I know. I haven't tested it yet.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
http://izbori2005.netinfo.bg - Èçáîðè 2005 - Ñàìî íàé-âàæíîòî. Âèæ, ÷óé, ïðî÷åòè è èçáåðè!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: advocacy-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: advocacy-help@perl.apache.org