Mailing List Archive: [lvs-users] SIP Persistence Engine / schedulers

It has been documented a few years ago, that the SIP Persistence Engine was
designed to work with one-packet scheduling.

The system I'm working with has VERY few clients (something like 3 or 4),
with some running much hotter than others. and OPS makes for very lopsided
balancing.
Is there -currently- a way to use a different scheduler with the SIP PE, or
a way to make OPS more balanced with few clients?

Thanks!
_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/

LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@LinuxVirtualServer.org
Send requests to lvs-users-request@LinuxVirtualServer.org
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users

On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 11:14:06AM -0400, Michael Klebanow wrote:
> It has been documented a few years ago, that the SIP Persistence Engine was
> designed to work with one-packet scheduling.
>
> The system I'm working with has VERY few clients (something like 3 or 4),
> with some running much hotter than others. and OPS makes for very lopsided
> balancing.
> Is there -currently- a way to use a different scheduler with the SIP PE, or
> a way to make OPS more balanced with few clients?

I am not aware of a current solution to that problem.

_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/

LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@LinuxVirtualServer.org
Send requests to lvs-users-request@LinuxVirtualServer.org
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users