Hi,-
This new thread is the continuation of previous thread back in Feb 2021:
Re: MMapDirectory vs In Memory Lucene Index (i.e., ByteBuffersDirectory)
May i mention that i cat'ed *fdt files (largest index files among 98
index files generated) by directing to new files so
that these files are cached to create in memory lucene index? i have
598GB available in memory and total size of index files is < 16G.
So, i think the cat'ed fdt files must be in the memory.
i also cat'ed smaller files via just cat <filename>.
I still see similar performance from lucene index after doing this.
Is there any suggestions please?
Thanks
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
This new thread is the continuation of previous thread back in Feb 2021:
Re: MMapDirectory vs In Memory Lucene Index (i.e., ByteBuffersDirectory)
May i mention that i cat'ed *fdt files (largest index files among 98
index files generated) by directing to new files so
that these files are cached to create in memory lucene index? i have
598GB available in memory and total size of index files is < 16G.
So, i think the cat'ed fdt files must be in the memory.
i also cat'ed smaller files via just cat <filename>.
I still see similar performance from lucene index after doing this.
Is there any suggestions please?
Thanks
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org