Mailing List Archive

Which Lucene 8.5.X is recommended?
Hi,-

 is it best to use 8.5.2?

Best regards



Release 8.5.2
Bug Fixes   (1)
LUCENE-9350: Partial reversion of LUCENE-9068; holding levenshtein
automata on FuzzyQuery can end up blowing up query caches which use
query objects as cache keys, so building the automata is now delayed to
search time again.
(Alan Woodward, Mike Drob


Release 8.5.1 [2020-04-16]
Bug Fixes   (1)
LUCENE-9300: Fix corruption of the new gen field infos when doc values
updates are applied on a segment created externally and added to the
index with IndexWriter#addIndexes(Directory).
(Jim Ferenczi, Adrien Grand)


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: Which Lucene 8.5.X is recommended? [ In reply to ]
Always use the most recent point release. The only time we go from x.y.z to x.y.z+1 is if there are _significant_ problems. This is much different than going from x.y to x.y+1...

> On Nov 12, 2020, at 5:49 PM, baris.kazar@oracle.com wrote:
>
> Hi,-
>
> is it best to use 8.5.2?
>
> Best regards
>
>
>
> Release 8.5.2
> Bug Fixes (1)
> LUCENE-9350: Partial reversion of LUCENE-9068; holding levenshtein automata on FuzzyQuery can end up blowing up query caches which use query objects as cache keys, so building the automata is now delayed to search time again.
> (Alan Woodward, Mike Drob
>
>
> Release 8.5.1 [2020-04-16]
> Bug Fixes (1)
> LUCENE-9300: Fix corruption of the new gen field infos when doc values updates are applied on a segment created externally and added to the index with IndexWriter#addIndexes(Directory).
> (Jim Ferenczi, Adrien Grand)
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: Which Lucene 8.5.X is recommended? [ In reply to ]
Thanks, i will use 8.5.2.

i think saw some minor release (z) without any issues but i will double check this.
However, i will use 8.5.2. The bug fixes in that release may result in better performance.

Best regards

> On Nov 12, 2020, at 11:09 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerickson@gmail.com> wrote:
> ?Always use the most recent point release. The only time we go from x.y.z to x.y.z+1 is if there are _significant_ problems. This is much different than going from x.y to x.y+1...
>
>> On Nov 12, 2020, at 5:49 PM, baris.kazar@oracle.com wrote:
>>
>> Hi,-
>>
>> is it best to use 8.5.2?
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>>
>>
>> Release 8.5.2
>> Bug Fixes (1)
>> LUCENE-9350: Partial reversion of LUCENE-9068; holding levenshtein automata on FuzzyQuery can end up blowing up query caches which use query objects as cache keys, so building the automata is now delayed to search time again.
>> (Alan Woodward, Mike Drob
>>
>>
>> Release 8.5.1 [2020-04-16]
>> Bug Fixes (1)
>> LUCENE-9300: Fix corruption of the new gen field infos when doc values updates are applied on a segment created externally and added to the index with IndexWriter#addIndexes(Directory).
>> (Jim Ferenczi, Adrien Grand)
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: Which Lucene 8.5.X is recommended? [ In reply to ]
Thanks, i will use 8.5.2.

i think saw some minor release switch on (z) without any issues but i will double check this.

However, i will use 8.5.2 since the bug fixes in that release may result in better performance for Lucene index.

Best regards

> On Nov 12, 2020, at 11:09 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerickson@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> ?Always use the most recent point release. The only time we go from x.y.z to x.y.z+1 is if there are _significant_ problems. This is much different than going from x.y to x.y+1...
>
>> On Nov 12, 2020, at 5:49 PM, baris.kazar@oracle.com wrote:
>>
>> Hi,-
>>
>> is it best to use 8.5.2?
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>>
>>
>> Release 8.5.2
>> Bug Fixes (1)
>> LUCENE-9350: Partial reversion of LUCENE-9068; holding levenshtein automata on FuzzyQuery can end up blowing up query caches which use query objects as cache keys, so building the automata is now delayed to search time again.
>> (Alan Woodward, Mike Drob
>>
>>
>> Release 8.5.1 [2020-04-16]
>> Bug Fixes (1)
>> LUCENE-9300: Fix corruption of the new gen field infos when doc values updates are applied on a segment created externally and added to the index with IndexWriter#addIndexes(Directory).
>> (Jim Ferenczi, Adrien Grand)
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org