Mailing List Archive

1 2  View All
Re: [VOTE] Lucene logo contest [ In reply to ]
Hi all,

Apparently there is an extension of the deadline so in the meanwhile if
somebody has ideas about the logo feel free to share.
I can give it another try although I cannot promise anything about the
final outcome :P

Best,
Stamatis


On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 7:00 PM <baris.kazar@oracle.com> wrote:

> Hi Ryan,-
>
> I very much appreciate this oppurtunity to submit my designs.
>
> Best regards
>
>
> On 6/18/20 1:29 AM, Ryan Ernst wrote:
> > > IMHO this vote is invalid because...
> > > it doesn’t include the red / orange variants submitted by Dustin Haver
> >
> > I considered the latest submission by Dustin Haver to be his
> > submission, but I can see how some might like the other better and it
> > should have been part of the vote.
> >
> > > I propose to restart the VOTE to include all submissions.
> >
> > Given that I omitted the submission above, that seems reasonable. And
> > since we are restarting, I guess we can allow Baris to add in an entry.
> >
> > Baris, please add your entry to the jira issue. I will restart the
> > vote next week.
> >
> > > If we're going to have more options, I suggest we use "ranked voting"
> >
> > I considered rank voting, but tallying a rank vote by hand can be
> > incredibly tedious. I don't think we should use any external tools
> > since that prohibits verification on who is voting from the PMC.
> > However, given the lastingness of this decision, I guess it is fair to
> > do the necessary harder tallying work of rank choice voting over
> > email. When I restart the vote, I will give instructions on making
> > multiple selections.
> >
> > So, consider this vote CLOSED and VOID.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 8:27 AM David Smiley <david.w.smiley@gmail.com
> > <mailto:david.w.smiley@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > If we're going to have more options, I suggest we use "ranked
> > voting": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ranked_voting
> > <
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ranked_voting__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!JgWdGehe0o2fApygEKb6X6IZpJAzG1ZZh0cvE1I1R4xX1eJ9iyu7IqgEYaVxqtj8TA$
> >
> >
> > If you create a Google Form based submission which supports a
> > ranked choice input, then this should make it probably not hard to
> > tally the results correctly. A PMC boolean would be helpful too.
> >
> > ~ David
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 11:14 AM Andrzej Bia?ecki <ab@getopt.org
> > <mailto:ab@getopt.org>> wrote:
> >
> > IMHO this vote is invalid because it doesn’t include all
> > submissions linked to that issue. Specifically, it doesn’t
> > include the red / orange variants submitted by Dustin Haver
> > (which I personally prefer over the sickly green ones … ;) )
> >
> > I propose to restart the VOTE to include all submissions.
> >
> >> On 17 Jun 2020, at 17:04, Adrien Grand <jpountz@gmail.com
> >> <mailto:jpountz@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >> A. (PMC) I like that it retains the same idea as our current
> >> logo with a more modern look.
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 4:58 PM Andi Vajda <osaf@ovaltofu.org
> >> <mailto:osaf@ovaltofu.org>> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> C. (current logo)
> >>
> >> Andi.. (pmc)
> >>
> >>> On Jun 15, 2020, at 15:08, Ryan Ernst <ryan@iernst.net
> >>> <mailto:ryan@iernst.net>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> ?
> >>> Dear Lucene and Solr developers!
> >>>
> >>> In February a contest was started to design a new logo
> >>> for Lucene [1]. That contest concluded, and I am now
> >>> (admittedly a little late!) calling a vote.
> >>>
> >>> The entries are labeled as follows:
> >>>
> >>> A. Submitted by Dustin Haver [2]
> >>>
> >>> B. Submitted by Stamatis Zampetakis [3] Note that this
> >>> has several variants. Within the linked entry there are
> >>> 7 patterns and 7 color palettes. Any vote for B should
> >>> contain the pattern number, like B1 or B3. If a B
> >>> variant wins, we will have a followup vote on the color
> >>> palette.
> >>>
> >>> C. The current Lucene logo [4]
> >>>
> >>> Please vote for one of the three (or nine depending on
> >>> your perspective!) above choices. Note that anyone in
> >>> the Lucene+Solr community is invited to express their
> >>> opinion, though only Lucene+Solr PMC cast binding votes
> >>> (indicate non-binding votes in your reply, please). This
> >>> vote will close one week from today, Mon, June 22, 2020.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks!
> >>>
> >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9221
> >>> <
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9221__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!JgWdGehe0o2fApygEKb6X6IZpJAzG1ZZh0cvE1I1R4xX1eJ9iyu7IqgEYaVF6FgMug$
> >
> >>> [2]
> >>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12999548/Screen%20Shot%202020-04-10%20at%208.29.32%20AM.png
> >>> <
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12999548/Screen*20Shot*202020-04-10*20at*208.29.32*20AM.png__;JSUlJSU!!GqivPVa7Brio!JgWdGehe0o2fApygEKb6X6IZpJAzG1ZZh0cvE1I1R4xX1eJ9iyu7IqgEYaU-0OqLrw$
> >
> >>> [3]
> >>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12997768/zabetak-1-7.pdf
> >>> <
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12997768/zabetak-1-7.pdf__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!JgWdGehe0o2fApygEKb6X6IZpJAzG1ZZh0cvE1I1R4xX1eJ9iyu7IqgEYaXc3KyVbA$
> >
> >>> [4]
> >>>
> https://lucene.apache.org/theme/images/lucene/lucene_logo_green_300.png
> >>> <
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lucene.apache.org/theme/images/lucene/lucene_logo_green_300.png__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!JgWdGehe0o2fApygEKb6X6IZpJAzG1ZZh0cvE1I1R4xX1eJ9iyu7IqgEYaVcq8T-BA$
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Adrien
> >
>

1 2  View All