Mailing List Archive: SuppressForbidden for anonymous classes

Hello everyone.
We use Lucene's nice forbidden api check tool. I wonder if anonymous
classes could be supressed using supress annotation. For example:

httpService = new HttpService(...) {
@Override
@SuppressForbidden(reason = "Sun's HTTP server usage")
protected HttpHandler createHandler(...) {
return new HttpHandler(...) {
@Override
protected void handle(HttpExchange he) {
*...*
}
};
}
};

when I run check for this code I get:
ERROR: Forbidden interface use: com.sun.net.httpserver.HttpHandler
[non-portable or internal runtime class]

Since createHandler method already has supress annotation, I was expecting
it would be supressed. Any way to supress this without creating separate
class?

Thanks in advance.

Elbek.

Hi
forbiddenapis itself is an independent project, so maybe the github repo
for it is the right place for you (since it seems the code is not related
to Lucene)?

2019?7?17?(?) 2:05 elbek kamoliddinov <elbek.dev@gmail.com>:

> Hello everyone.
> We use Lucene's nice forbidden api check tool. I wonder if anonymous
> classes could be supressed using supress annotation. For example:
>
> httpService = new HttpService(...) {
> @Override
> @SuppressForbidden(reason = "Sun's HTTP server usage")
> protected HttpHandler createHandler(...) {
> return new HttpHandler(...) {
> @Override
> protected void handle(HttpExchange he) {
> *...*
> }
> };
> }
> };
>
> when I run check for this code I get:
> ERROR: Forbidden interface use: com.sun.net.httpserver.HttpHandler
> [non-portable or internal runtime class]
>
> Since createHandler method already has supress annotation, I was expecting
> it would be supressed. Any way to supress this without creating separate
> class?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Elbek.
>